Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A precise method for the assessment of tibial ultrasound velocity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We assessed a method for the measurement of ultrasound velocity in cortical bone of the human tibia using a probe designed to minimize the effects of surrounding soft tissues. Of four different measurement values, the maximum velocity (average of the five highest readings) gave the lowest errors of reproducibility in relation to the population variance (standardized coefficient of variation=1.8%). The maximum velocity varied according to the tibial site measured and for practical reasons the mid-tibial site was chosen for further study. The short-term intra- and inter-observer reproducibilities (coefficients of variation) were 0.35% (n=22) and 0.50% (n=27) respectively. Long-term reproducibility over 4 months in 31 subjects was 0.68%. There was no significant difference in maximum ultrasound velocity between the dominant and non-dominant tibia in 78 women (3764±209 vs 3763±199 m/s). Tibial ultrasound velocity was significantly higher in 73 premenopausal women (3999±102 m/s) than in 129 women referred for assessment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (3780±168 m/s), 26 women with steroid-induced osteoporosis (3790±188 m/s) and 4 women with hyperparathyroidism (3575±261 m/s). In premenopausal women, ultrasound velocity did not correlate significantly with age, height, weight or body mass index. In women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, ultrasound velocity decreased with age after the menopause (r=−0.47,p<0.0001) and body weight exerted a weaker protective effect. The apparent annual decrease in velocity with age in postmenopausal osteoporosis (8.5 m/s) was comparable to the error of reproducibility. We conclude that the technique for measuring tibial ultrasound velocity is highly reproducible in relation to the distribution of values in the population and is sensitive to age- and osteoporosis-induced changes in bone. Further studies are required to examine its relationship to other indices of skeletal status to determine the biological and clinical relevance of the technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 1993;341:72–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC. Baseline measurements of bone mass predicts fracture in white women. Ann Intern Med 1989;11:355–61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gardsell P, Johnell O, Nilsson BE. Predicting fractures in women by using forearm bone densitometry. Calcif Tissue Int 1989;44:235–42.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kaufman J, Einhorn T. Perspectives on ultrasound assessment of bone. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:517–25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Langton CM, Ali AV, Riggs CM, Evans GP, Bonfield W. A contact method for the assessment of ultrasound velocity and broadband attenuation in cortical and cancellous bone. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1989;11:243–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCloskey EV, Murray SA, Charlesworth D, Miller C, Fordham J, Clifford K, et al. Assessment of broadband ultrasound attenuation in the os calcis in vitro. Clin Sci 1990;78:221–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heaney RP, Avioli LV, Chestnut CH III, Lappe J, Recker RR, Brandenburger GH. Osteoporotic bone fragility: detection by ultrasound transmission velocity. JAMA 1989;261:2986–90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miller C, Herd R, Ramalingam T, Fogelman I, Blake G. Ultrasound velocity measurements through the calcaneus: which velocity should be measured? Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:31–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wapniarz M, Lehmann R, Banik N, Radwan M, Klein K, Allolio B. Apparent velocity of ultrasound (AVU) at the patella in comparison to bone mineral density at the lumbar spine in normal males and females. Bone Miner 1993;23:243–52.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Young H, Howey S, Purdie DW. Broadband ultrasound attenuation compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in screening of postmenopausal low bone density. Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:160–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCloskey EV, Murray SA, Miller C, Charlesworth D, Tindale W, O'Doherty DP, et al. Broadband ultrasound attenuation in the os calcis: relationship to bone mineral at other skeletal sites. Clin Sci 1990;78:227–33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herd R, Ramalingham T, Ryan P, Fogelman I, Blake G. Measurements of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in the calcaneus in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 1992;2:247–57.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Agren M, Karellas A, Leahy D, Marks S, Baran D. Ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus: a sensitive and specific discriminator of osteopenia in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 1991;48:240–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porter RW, Miller CG, Grainger D, Palmer SB. Prediction of hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective study. BMJ 1990;301:638–41.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vesterby A, Mosekilde L, Gunderson H, Melsen F, Mosekilde Le, Holme K, Sørensen S. Biological meaningful determinants of in vitro strength of lumbar vertebrae. Bone 1991;12:219–24.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Spadaro JA, Werner FW, Brenner RA, Fortino MD, Fay LA, Edwards WT. Cortical and trabecular bone contribute strength to the osteopenic distal radius. J Orothop Res 1994:12:211–18.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zagzebski JA, Rossman PJ, Mesina C, Mazess RB, Madsen EL. Ultrasound transmission measurements through the os calcis. Calcif Tissue Int 1991;49:107–11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lees B, Stevenson JC. Preliminary evaluation of a new ultrasound bone densitometer. Calcif Tissue Int 1993;53:149–52.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glüer CC, Vahensieck M, Faulkner KG, Engelke K, Black D, Genant HK. Site matched calcaneal measurements of broad band ultrasound attenuation and single X-ray absorptiometry. Do they measure different skeletal properties? J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:1071–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schott AM, Hans D, Sornay-Rendu E, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ. Ultrasound measurements on os calcis: precision and age-related changes in a normal female population. Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:249–54.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ruff CB, Hayes WC. Cross-sectional geometry of pecos pueblo femora and tibiae: a biomechanical investigation. II. Sex, age and side differences. Am J Phys Anthropol 1983;60:383–400.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ruff CB, Hayes WC. Sex differences in age-related remodeling of the femur and tibia. J Orthop Res 1988;6:886–96.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Melton LJ, Chao EYS, Lane J. Biomechanical aspects of fractures. In: Riggs BL, Melton LJ, editors. Osteoporosis: etiology, diagnosis and management. New York: Raven Press, 1988:111–31.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng S, Toivanen JA, Suominen H, Toivanen JT, Timonen J. Estimation of structural and geometrical properties of cortical bone by computerized tomography in 78-year-old women. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:139–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Disease, Department of Human Metabolism and Clinical Biochemistry, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK

    J. M. Orgee, H. Foster, E. V. McCloskey, S. Khan, G. Coombes &  J. A. Kanis MD

Authors
  1. J. M. Orgee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Foster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. V. McCloskey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G. Coombes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. A. Kanis MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orgee, J.M., Foster, H., McCloskey, E.V. et al. A precise method for the assessment of tibial ultrasound velocity. Osteoporosis Int 6, 1–7 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01626530

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01626530

Keywords

Search

Navigation