Skip to main content
Log in

Geometric measurements of the proximal femur in UK women: Secular increase between the late 1950s and early 1990s

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether hip axis or femoral length has increased in women in the United Kingdom between the late 1950s and early 1990s. Such an observation would be of interest as it might explain the rise in age-specific incidence of hip fracture observed during these years. We studied two sets of antero-posterior pelvic radiographs of women aged 55–69 years taken during the course of population-based studies in the UK, one in 1958–60 and the other in 1989–91. One observer (S.G.) recorded the following measurements at the right hip: hip axis length (HAL), femoral length (FL) and femoral width (FW). Two summary ratios, HAL/FW and FL/FW were calculated to allow for differences in radiographic technique. HAL, FL and FW were greater in the 1989-91 films compared with those taken in 1958–60. Both HAL and FL expressed as a ratio to FW were also greater in the later films. FL/FW increased by 4.5% (p<0.05); HAL/FW increased by 2.3%, though this was not statistically significant. We conclude that there has been a small apparent change in geometric measurements of the hip during the past 36 years. Cautious extrapolation suggests that such a change may explain up to one third of the increase in incidence of hip fracture observed during this period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyce WJ, Vessey MP. Rising incidence of fracture of the proximal femur. Lancet 1985;1:150–1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Spector TD, Cooper C, Lewis AF. Trends in admissions for hip fracture in England and Wales, 1968–85. BMJ 1990;300:1173–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnell O, Nilsson B, Obrant K, Sernbo I. Age and sex patterns of hip fracture: changes in 30 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1984;55:290–2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Melton LJ III, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL. Secular trends in the incidence of hip fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 1987;41:57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper C. Epidemiology and public health impact of osteoporosis. In: Reid DM, ed. Ballieres Clinical Rheumatology. London: Balliere Tindall, 1993;7:459–77.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Black D, Palermo L, Gluer CC, Genant HK. Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures. I Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1211–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reid IR, Chin K, Evans MC, Jones JG. Relation between increase in length of hip axis in older women between 1950s and 1990s and increase in age specific rates of hip fracture. BMJ 1994;309:508–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lawrence JS. Rheumatism in populations. London: Heinemann Medical, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Spector TD, McCloskey EV, Doyle DV, Kanis JA. Prevalence of vertebral fracture in women and the relationship with bone density and symptoms: the Chingford study. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:817–22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baker RJ, Nelder JA. The GLIM System. Release 3.77, Oxford: Numerical Algorithms Group, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Neill, T.W., Grazio, S., Spector, T.D. et al. Geometric measurements of the proximal femur in UK women: Secular increase between the late 1950s and early 1990s. Osteoporosis Int 6, 136–140 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623937

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623937

Keywords

Navigation