Skip to main content
Log in

Measurements of the normal lumbar spinal canal by computed tomography

Mensurations tomodensitométriques du canal vertébral lombaire normal — Etude segmentaire en L3–L4 et L4–L5 rapportée à la taille des sujets

Segmental study of L3–L4 and L4–L5 related to the height of the subject

  • Radiological Anatomy
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Computed tomography measurements of the main diameters and cross section areas of the lumbar vertebral canal and the lower end of the dural sac at the L3–L4 and L4–L5 levels were made in 34 young male adults who were free of symptoms. This study shows a statistically significant correlation between the height of the subject and the cross sectional area of the canal and the dural sac, and the interpedicular diameter. The determination of regression coefficients enabled an estimate to be made of the mean values of these parameters in relation to height, the actual values having a normal distribution around these means. This study suggest that the areas, when narrowing is suspected, should be interpreted as a function of the height of the subject.

Résumé

Les mesures TDM des principaux diamètres et surfaces du canal vertébral lombaire et du cul-de-sac dural en L3–L4 et L4–L5 sont effectuées chez 43 adultes jeunes, de sexe masculin, strictement asymptomatiques. Cette étude montre l'existence d'une corrélation statistiquement significative entre la taille des sujets et certaines mesures : surface du canal, surface du fourreau dural, diamètre interpédiculaire. La détermination d'une droite de régression permet d'apprécier la valeur moyenne de ces paramètres en fonction de la taille, les valeurs normales se répartissent autour de cette moyenne dans les limites de l'écart-type. Cette étude suggère que les valeurs de surface, mesurées lors de l'étude des canaux rétrécis, doivent être interprétées en fonction de la taille des sujets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bolender NF, Schonstrom NSR, Spengler DM (1985) Tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67: 240–245

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chevrot A, Dupont AM, Vallee C, Gires F, Wybier M, Ben Harouda M, Pallardy G (1988) Etude du fourreau dural en position assise et debout au cours de la saccoradiculographie. A propos de 50 cas. J Radiol 69: 397–403

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chirossel JP, Crouzet G, Kechaou S, Passagia JG, Louveau A, Mercier P (1986) La segmentation du défilé radiculaire lombaire. Neurochirurgie 32: 25–36

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crouzet G, Vasdev A, Chirossel JP, Peit C, Geindre M (1983) Réflexions sur les aspects tomodensitométriques du canal lombaire étroit. J Radiol 64: 405–414

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deburge A, Massare C, Busson J (1988) Itinéraires d'imagerie dans les lomboscialtalgies de la sténose canalaire. In: Rachis et moelle : l'imagerie aujourd'hui. Vigot, Paris, pp 93–114

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenstein S (1976) Measurements of the lumbar spinal canal in 2 racial groups. Clin Orthop 115: 42–46

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenstein S (1980) The trefoil configuration of the lumbar vertebral canal. A study of South African scheletal material. J Bone Joint Surg 62 [Br] 62: 73–76

    Google Scholar 

  8. Laredo JD, Bard M (1988) Sténose du canal central. In: Scanner du rachis lombaire. Masson, Paris, pp 47–60

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee BCP, Kazam E, Newman AD (1978) Computed tomography of the spine and spinal cord. Radiology 128: 95–102

    Google Scholar 

  10. Louis R (1982) Chirurgie du rachis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marchesi D, Schneider E, Glauser P, Aebi M (1988) Morphometric analysis of the thoraco-lumbar and lumbar pedicles, anatomo-radiologic study. Surg Radiol Anat 10: 317–322

    Google Scholar 

  12. Massare Cl (1988) Scanner du rachis: le bilan a dix ans. Le point de vue du radiologiste. In: Rachis et moelle. L'imagerie, aujourd'hui, Vigot, Paris, pp : 48–69

    Google Scholar 

  13. Merran S (1986) Anatomie radiologique. Variantes et pièges. In: Rachis lombaire et tomodensitométrique. Medsi, Paris, pp 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mikhael MA, Ciric I, Tarkington JA, Vick NA (1981) Neuroradiological evaluation of lateral recess syndrome. Radiology 140: 97–107

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morvan G (1986) Le rachis lombaire. In: Le scanner ostéo-articulaire Vigot, Paris, pp 41–77

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schaik Van JJP, Verbiest H, Schaik Van FDJ (1985) Morphometry of lower lumbar vertebrae as seen on CT scan : newly recognised characteristics. AJR : 327–335

  17. Schonstrom NSR, Bolender NF, Spengler DM (1985) The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine. Spine 10: 806–811

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ullrich CG, Binet EF, Sane Eki G, Kieffer SA (1980) Quantitative assessment of the lumbar spinal canal by computed tomography. Radiology 134: 137–143

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wackenheim AG, Dietemann JL (1987) Canal lombaire étroit. In: Radiodiagnostic du rachis lombaire. Masson, Paris, pp 61–72

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wilmink JT, Korte JH, Penning L (1988) Dimensions of the spinal canal in individuals symptomatic and non symptomatic for sciatica: a CT study. Neuroradiology 30 : 547–550

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zeng YL (1988) CT measurement of the normal cervical and lumbar spinal canal in Chinese. Chin Med J 101: 898–900

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gouzien, P., Cazalbou, C., Boyer, B. et al. Measurements of the normal lumbar spinal canal by computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat 12, 143–148 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623341

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623341

Key words

Navigation