Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of collateral circulation of the hand

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1929, Edgar V. Allen described a noninvasive evaluation of the patency of the arterial supply to the hand of patients with thromboangitis obliterans (Am J Med Sci 1929;178:237). In the early 1950s, Allen's test was modified (Wright I. Vascular diseases in clinical practice. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1952) for use as a test of collateral circulation prior to arterial cannulation. This test involves the examiner occluding the patient's ulnar and radial arteries while the patient makes a fist, causing the hand to blanch. The patient is then asked to extend the fingers. After the hand is open, the examiner releases the ulnar artery while continuing to maintain pressure on the radial artery. Adequate collateral circulation is felt to be indicated by return of normal color to the hand. The patient is instructed not to hyperextend the fingers when opening the hand. Hyperextension may cause a decrease in perfusion to the arch, possibly resulting in a false interpretation of the Allen test (Anesthesiology 1972;37:356). The modified Allen's test can be performed quickly and easily, but it is susceptible to error. (With Allen's original test, both hands were tested simultaneously. The patient clenched both fists tightly for 1 minute while the examiner compressed one artery of each hand. This method helps diagnose complete occlusion, just as Allen intended. The test was later modified, however, to evaluate the adequacy of collateral circulation. To perform the modified Allen's test, the examiner compresses both arteries while the patient's fists are clenched. The patient then opens the hand, and the adequacy of circulation is evaluated when the examiner releases one of the arteries.) This study was designed to combine the modified Allen's test with the sensitivity of oximetry and plethysmography to provide a quantifiable and reproducible evaluation of the palmar collateral circulation with or without the subject's cooperation. Superficial palmar arches of 90 normal volunteers (aged 22–45 years) were evaluated with the modified Allen's test. These results were compared with the flow patterns demonstrated by plethysmography and pulse oximetry. All of the modified Allen's tests were normal, with the palmar blush occurring in an average of 2.3 seconds (range, 2–5 s). Results were recorded independently by two observers, with agreement in all cases. Four of the 90 (4.4%) palmar arches were found to have abnormal circulatory patterns. Plethysmography clearly demonstrated the dominant arterial supply to the hand and, in appropriate cases, indicated the existence of an incomplete arch. The four abnormal circulatory patterns (two incomplete palmar arches and two other aberrant arterial communications) were clearly shown by plethysmography. Pulse oximetry was found to be too sensitive. Significant changes in flow did not result in a decrease in saturation. Only the incomplete superficial palmar arches resulted in a change in saturation. The two abnormal arterial communications were not detected by pulse oximetry. Pulse oximetry also could not show dominant flow patterns. Our findings indicate that plethysmography can be used to demonstrate palmar collateral circulation, but that pulse oximetry cannot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doscher W, Viswanathan B, Stein T, Margolis IB. Physiologic anatomy of the palmar circulation in 200 normal hands. J Cardiovasc Surg 1985;26:171–174

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mozersky DJ, et al. Ultrasonic evaluation of the palmar circulation. Am J Surg 1973;126:810–812

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coleman SS, Anson BJ. Arterial patterns in the hand based upon a study of 650 specimens. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1961;113:409–424

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cederholm I, Sorensen J, Carlsson C. Thrombosis following percutaneous radial artery cannulation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1986;30:227–230

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baker RJ, Chunprapaph B, Nyhus LM. Severe ischemia of the hand following radial artery catheterization. Surgery 1976;80:449–457

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katz AM, Birnbaum M, Moylan J, Pellet J. Gangrene of the hand and forearm: a complication of radial artery cannulation. Crit Care Med 1974;2:270–272

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bedford RF, Wollman H. Complications of percutaneous radial artery cannulation. Anesthesiology 1973;38:228–236

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wilkins RG. Radial artery cannulation and ischemic damage: a review. Anaesthesia 1985; 40:896–899

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greenhow DE. Incorrect performance of the Allen's test: ulnar artery flow erroneously presumed inadequate. Anesthesiology 1972;37:356

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gandhi S, Reynolds A. A modification of Allen's test to detect aberrant ulnar collateral circulation. Anesthesiology 1983;59:147–148

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ejrup B, Fischer B, Wright IS. Clinical evaluation of blood flow to the hand. Circulation 1966;33:778–780

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peters KR, Chapin JW. Allen's test—positive or negative? Anesthesiology 1980;53:85

    Google Scholar 

  13. Messick JM. Allen's test—neither negative nor positive. Anesthesiology 1981;54:523

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matsuki A. A modified Allen's test using a pulse oximeter. Anaesth Intensive Care 1988;16:126–127

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng EY, Lauer KK, Stommel KA, Guenther NR. Evaluation of the palmar circulation by pulse oximetry. J Clin Monit 1989;5:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rozenberg RD, Rosenberg M, Birkhan J. Allen's test performed by pulse oximetry. Anaesthesia 1988;43:515–516

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lawson D, Norley I, Korbon G, et al. Blood flow limits and pulse oximeter signal detection. Anesthesiology 1987;75:599–603

    Google Scholar 

  18. Von Nijboer JA, Dorlas JC, Prins JOJ. Beziahung zwischen fotoelektrischem plethysmogramm und volumenpulsation wahrend allgemeinanaesthesie. Anaesth Reanim 1983;5;259–264

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dorlas BJC, Von Nijboer JA. Photo-electric plethysmography as a monitoring device in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1985;57:524–530

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brodsky JB. A simple method to determine patency of the ulnar artery intraoperatively prior to radial-artery cannulation. Anesthesiology 1975;42:626–627

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fuhrman T, Reilley T, Pippin W. Comparison of digital blood pressure (DBP), the modified Allen's test (AT), plethysmography (P), and oximetry (OX) as determinants of collateral blood flow to the hand. Anesthesiology 1990;73:A228

  22. Williams T, Schenken JR. Radial artery puncture and the Allen test. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:164

    Google Scholar 

  23. Slogoff S, Keats A, Arlund C. On the safety of radial artery cannulation. Anesthesiology 1983;59:42–47

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was funded by the Anesthesiology Research Foundation and the Samuel J. Roessler Research Scholarship.

This paper was presented at the Society of Critical Care Medicine's 19th Annual Education and Scientific Symposium, San Francisco, California, May, 1990.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuhrman, T.M., Pippin, W.D., Talmage, L.A. et al. Evaluation of collateral circulation of the hand. J Clin Monitor Comput 8, 28–32 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01618084

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01618084

Key words

Navigation