Abstract
This article reports on an ethnographic study of a mechanical engineering design class. The findings are based on participant observation of one student design team of three students as they designed, tested and built an engineered solution to a problem over a period of ten weeks. The paper describes the curricular efforts to provide social and material affordances both for learning and doing design, and the failure of students on the observed team to take up those affordances. It offers explanations for failure within a framework of conflicting classroom views and pedagogic issues. It discusses the implications of the observed student behavior for design education in general, and mechanical engineering design, in particular.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman C, Bursic K. Teaching engineering design: Can reading a textbook make a difference? Research in Engineering Design 1996;2:1–11
Atman C, Bursic K, Lozito S. An application of protocol analysis to the engineering design process. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 1996
Brassard B. The Memory Jogger Plus, Methuen, MA.: GOAL/QPC, 1989
Brown A, Palincsar A. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program of enhancing learning. In: Borkowski JDDJG (ed), Intelligence and Exceptionality: New directions for theory, assessment and instructional practices, Ablex, New Jersey, 1987
Brown AL, Bransford JD, Ferrara RA, Campione JC. Learning, remembering and understanding. In: Mussen PH, (ed), Handbook of Child Psychology, Wiley, 1983
Bucciarelli L. Designing Engineers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994
Chi M. Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: examples from learning and discovery in science. In: Giere R. (ed), Cognitive Models of Science, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, 1992
Cohen E. Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research 1994;64(1):1–35
deSessa A. Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction 1993;10(2 & 3):105–125
Dixon, Engineering design science: the state of education. Mechanical Engineering 1991:64–67
Latour B. Drawing things together. In: Lynch Michael, S. Woolgar M (eds), Representation in Scientific Practice MIT Press, Cambridge, MA; 1988
Lave J, Wenger J. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1991
Leont'ev AN. Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1978
Newstetter W. (Text, Co-text and Context: An investigation of evacuated writing, Dissertation, Lancaster University, England, 1995
Newstetter W, Hmelo C. Distributing cognition or how they don't: An investigation of student collaborative learning. ICLS '96 AACE, 1966
Pea R. Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. P. S. D. (Eds.), Distributed Cognitions, Cambridges, New York, 1993
Resnick L. Education and Learning to Think, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1987
Traweek S. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The world of high energy physics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988
Vygotsky L. Mind in Society Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1978
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newstetter, W.C. Of green monkeys and failed affordances: A case study of a mechanical engineering design course. Research in Engineering Design 10, 118–128 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01616692
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01616692