Skip to main content
Log in

The significance of conformal inversion in quantum field theory

  • Published:
Communications in Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 2-point functions of Euclidean conformal invariant quantum field theory are looked at as intertwining kernels of the conformal group. In this analysis a fundamental role is played by a two-element groupW, whose non-identity element ℛ=R·I consists of the conformal inversionR multiplied by a space-time reflectionI. The propagators of conformal invariant quantum field theory are determined by the requirement of ℛ-covariance. The importance of the ℛ-inversion in the theory of Zeta-functions is mentioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gel'fand, I.M.: Proc. Int. Congr. Math., Stockholm, p. 74 (1962)

  2. Mack, G.: Renormalization and invariance in quantum field theory. New York: Plenum Press (to appear)

  3. Rühl, W.: Commun. math. Phys.30, 287 (1973);34, 149 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrara, S., Gatto, R., Grillo, A.: Springer tracts in modern physics, Vol. 67. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1973; Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)76, 161 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Todorov, I.T.: Conformal invariant quantum field theory with anomalous dimensions, Cargése Lectures (1973)

  6. See for example Warner, G.: Harmonic analysis on semi-simple Lie groups, Vol. I and II. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1972

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrara, S., Gatto, R., Grillo, A.F., Parisi, G.: Lett. Nuovo Cimento4, 115 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schreier, E.: Phys. Rev. D3, 980 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kunze, R.A., Stein, E.M.: Am. J. Math.89, 385 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Knapp, A.W., Stein, E.M.: Ann. Math.93, 489 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kostant, B.: Bull. Am. Math. Soc.75, 627 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  12. See ref. [6] Vol. I, p. 446

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weyl, H.: The classical groups. Princeton: Univ. Press. 1939

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hirai, T.: Proc. Japan Acad.42, 323 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gelfand, I.M., Shilov, G.E.: Generalized functions, Vol. 1, New York: Academic Press 1964

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koller, K.: Homogeneous interactions and a summation method in perturbation theory, Karpacz Lectures (1973)

  17. Gelfand, I.M., Graev, M.I., Vilenkin, N.Y.: Generalized functions, Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press 1966

    Google Scholar 

  18. See for example: Gel'fand, I.M., Graev, M.I., Pyatetskii-Shapiro, I.I.: Representation theory and automorphic functions. W.B. Saunders Co. 1969; Jacquet, H., Langlands, R.P.: Automorphic Forms on GL(2), Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 114. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1970; Weil, A.: Dirichlet series and automorphic forms. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 189, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1971

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by R. Haag

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koller, K. The significance of conformal inversion in quantum field theory. Commun.Math. Phys. 40, 15–35 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01614094

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01614094

Keywords

Navigation