Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic grouping: the next step in tumor classification

  • Original Papers
  • Clinical Oncology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

At present, staging of malignant tumors is based on the anatomical extent of disease defined by the T(umor) N(odes) M(etastasis) classification. The main objective of further efforts in classifying tumors is to identify additional independent prognostic factors and to create mathematical models that may predict disease progression by prognostic grouping. This article summarizes problems, methods and the design of coordinated studies on prognostic grouping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Joint Committee on Cancer (1988) Manual for staging of cancer, 3rd edn, Beahrs OH, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Myers MH (eds). Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Balch CM, Murad TM, Soong SJ, Ingalls AL, Halpern NB, Maddox WA (1987) A multifactorial analysis of melanoma: prognostic histopathological features comparing Clark's and Breslow's staging methods. Ann Surg 188:732–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter WH, Wampler GL, Stablein DM (1983) Regression analysis of survival data in cancer chemotherapy. Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J Stat Soc [B] 34:187–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding LP (1988) Clinical-pathological staging of large-bowel cancer. (A report of the ASCRS Committee.) Dis Colon Rectum 31:204–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding LP, Fry SJ, Phillips RK, Hittinger R (1986) Predictive outcome after curative resection for large bowel cancer. Lancet 2:904–907

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin MR, Bergstralh EJ, Coffrey RJ, Beart RW Jr, Melton LJ (1987) Predictors of survival after curative resection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Cancer 60:2318–2324

    Google Scholar 

  • Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Hermanek P (1986) Multivariate Analyse der Therapie-Ergebnisse bei kolorektalen Karzinomen. In: Hermanek P (Hrsg) Bedeutung des TNM-Systems für die klinische Onkologie. Zuckschwerdt, München, S 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanek P (1986) Klinische Krebsforschung. In: Gall FP, Hermanek P, Tonak J (Hrsg) Chirurgische Onkologie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, S 236–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanek P (1987) Prognostic value of the TMN system. In: Lapis K, Eckhardt S (eds) Lectures and symposia of the 14th International Cancer Congress, vol 3. Academia Kiado, Budapest, pp 135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanek P (1989) Gastric carcinoma — precancerous conditions and lessions, classification, and prognosis. In: Hotz J, Meyer HJ, Schmoll HJ (eds) Gastric carcinoma. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanek P, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Gall FP (1989) Prognostic factors in rectal carcinoma. A contribution to the further development of tumor classification. Dis Colon Rectum 32:593–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Jass JR, Sobin LH (1989) Histological typing of intestinal tumours. WHO international histological classification of tumours no.14, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 16–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (1980) The statistical analysis of failure time data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay R (1977) Proportional hazard regression models and the analysis of censored survived data. Applied statistics 26:227–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Soong S-J (1985) A computerized mathematical model and scoring system for predicting outcome in melanoma patients. In: Balch ChM, Milton GW (eds) Cutaneous melanoma. Clinical management and treatment results worldwide. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll BA (1987) Preface. In: Stoll BA (ed) Pointers to cancer prognosis. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp XI-XII

    Google Scholar 

  • UICC (1987) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 4th edn Hermanek P, Sobin LH (eds). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the expressed views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hermanek, P., Hutter, R.V.P. & Sobin, L.H. Prognostic grouping: the next step in tumor classification. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 116, 513–516 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01613004

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01613004

Key words

Navigation