Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptual robustness in simultaneous engineering: A formulation in continuous spaces

  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops a robust and distributed decision-making procedure for mathematically modeling and computationally supporting simultaneous decision-making by members of an engineering team. The procedure (1) treats variations in the design posed by other members of the design team asconceptual noise; (2) incorporates such noise factors into conceptually robust decision-making; (3) provides preference information to other team members on the variables they control; and (4) determines whether to execute the conceptually robust decision or to wait for further design certainty. While Changet al. (1994) extended Taguchi's approach to such simultaneous decision-making, this paper uses a continuous formulation and discusses the foundations of the procedure in greater detail. The method is demonstrated by a simple distributed design process for a DC motor, and the results are compared with those obtained for the same problem using sequential decision strategies in Krishnanet al. (1991).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, J-S. and Crawford, R. H. 1994. “Complexity Analysis of Computational Engineering Design Processes”,Design Theory and Methodology, ASME, DE-vol. 68, pp. 205–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aho, A. V., Hopcroft, J. E. and Ullman, J. D. 1983.Data Structures and Algorithms, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazaraa, M. S., Sherali, H. D. and Shetty, C. M. 1993.Nonlinear Programming, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, W. P., Darr, T. P., Durfee, E. H., Ward, A. C. and Wellman, M. P. 1993. “Supporting Mechatronic Design via a Distributed Network of Intelligent Agents”,Workshop on AI in Collaborative Design. AAAI, July 11–15, 1993, Washington, DC.

  • Bond, A. H. and Ricci, R. J. 1992. “Cooperation in Aircraft Design”,Research in Engineering Design, vol. 4, pp. 115–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, S. R. and Agogino, A. M. 1991. “An Intelligent Real Time Design Methodology for Catalog Selection”,Design Theory and Methodology, vol. 31, pp. 201–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T.-S., Ward, A. C., Lee, J. and Jacox, E. H. 1994. “Conceptual Robustness in Simultaneous Engineering: An Extension of Taguchi's Parameter Design”,Research in Engineering Design, vol. 6, pp. 211–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B. and Fujimoto, T. 1991.Product Development Performance, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consoli, R. D. and Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1992. “Application of Advanced Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Methods to Vehicle Design Synthesis”,Journal of Aircraft (Sept.–Oct.), vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 811–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, H. E. 1992. “New Avenues to Total Quality Management”,Manufacturing Review (Dec.), vol. 5, pp. 284–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutkosky, M. R., Conru, A. B. and Lee, S-H. 1994. “An Agent-based Approach to Concurrent Cable Harness Design”,AIEDAM, vol. 8, pp. 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutkosky, M. R. and Tenenbaum, J. M. 1990. “Toward a Computational Framework for Concurrent Engineering”,IECON, IEEE, vol. 1, pp. 700–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darr, T. P. and Birmingham, W. P. 1994. “Automated Design for Concurrent Engineering”,IEEE Expert, October 1994, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger, S. D., Whitney, D. E., Smith, R. P. and Gebala, D. A. 1990. “Organizing the Tasks in Complex Design Projects”,Design Theory and Methology, DE-vol. 27, pp. 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger, S. D., Whitney, D. E. and Gebala, D. A. 1992. “Organizing the Tasks in Complex Design Projects: Development of Tools to Present Design Procedures”,Proceedings, NSF Design and Manufacturing System Conference, Atlanta, Ga., January 1992.

  • Finger, S. and Dixon, J. R. 1989. “A Review of Research in Mechanical Engineering Design. Part I: Descriptive, Prescriptive, and Computer-Based Models of Design Processes”,Research in Engineering Design, vol. 1, pp. 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. 1989.Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, V., Eppinger, S. D. and Whitney, D. E. 1991. “Towards a Cooperative Design Methodology: Analysis of Sequential Descision Strategies”,Design Theory and Methodology, DE-vol. 31, pp. 165–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelena, N. F. and Agogino, A. M. 1991. “Formal Solution of N-type Taguchi Parameter Design Problems with Stochastic Noise Factors”,Design Theory and Methodology, DE-vol. 31, pp. 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, K. N. and Antonsson, E. K. 1993. “Extension to the Taguchi's Method of Product Design”,Journal of Mechanical Design (March), vol. 115, pp. 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papalambros, P. Y. and Wilde, D. J. 1988.Principles of Optimal Design, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddall, J. N. 1983.Probabilistic Engineering Design, Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. G. and Reinertsen, D. G. 1991.Developing Product in Half the Time, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., James, B. B. and Dovi, A. R. 1985. “Structural Optimization by Multilevel Decomposition”,AIAA Journal (Nov.), vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1775–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. and Tulinius, J. 1991. “MDO Can Help Resolve the Designer's Dilemma”,Aerospace America, September, pp. 32–5, 63.

  • Taguchi, G. 1986.Introduction to Quality Engineering, Krauss International Publications, White Plains, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, G. 1987.System of Experimental Design, vols. 1 and 2, Krauss International Publications, White Plains, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, G. and Clausing, D. 1990. “Robust Quality”,Harvard Business Review (Jan.–Feb.), vol. 68, pp. 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K., Sartorius, D., Pearson, S. and Jakiela, M. 1993. “Including the Value of Time in Design-for-Manufacturing Decision Making”,Management Science (April), vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 429–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasseur, H., Kurfess, T. R. and Cagan, J. 1993. “Economic Analysis of Quality Innovation in Design and Manufacturing”,Advances in Design Automation, ASME, DE-vol. 65-2, pp. 495–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. 1964.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T. C. 1993. “A General Decomposition Methodology for Optimal System Design”, PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Wagner, T. C. and Papalambros, P. Y. 1993. “A General Framework for Decomposition Analysis in Optimal Design”,Advances in Design Automation, ASME, DE-vol. 65-2, pp. 315–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A. C. and Seering, W. 1993a. “The Performance of a Mechanical Design Compiler”,Journal of Mechanical Design (Sept), vol. 115, pp. 341–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A. C. and Seering, W. 1993b. “Quantitative Inference in a Mechanical Design Compiler”,Journal of Mechanical Design (March), vol. 115, pp. 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A. C., Liker, J., Sobek, D. and Christiano, J. 1995. “The Second Toyota Paradox” accepted bythe Sloan Management Review.

  • Wellman, M. P. 1993. “A Market-oriented Programming Environment and its Application to Distributed Multicommodity Flow Problems”,Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 1, pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, M. P. 1994. “A Computational Market Model for Distributed Configuration Design”,Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on AI, AAAI, vol. 1, pp. 401–7. Seattle, WA, 1994.

  • Wilde, D. J. 1992. “Monotonicity Analysis of Taguchi's Robust Circuit Design Problem”,Journal of Mechanical Design (Dec), vol. 114, pp. 616–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, D. J. 1991. “A Counterexample to Signal-to-Noise Ratio as a Measure of Design Robustness”,Advances in Design Automation, DE-vol. 32-1, pp. 233–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allen C. Ward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, TS., Ward, A.C. Conceptual robustness in simultaneous engineering: A formulation in continuous spaces. Research in Engineering Design 7, 67–85 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01606903

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01606903

Keywords

Navigation