Skip to main content
Log in

The accuracy of death certificates

Implications for health statistics

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The death certificate is an important source of data on disease incidence, prevalence and mortality. It should therefore be as accurate and complete as possible. Death certificates from 433 autopsied hospital patients were reviewed and matched against the results of post-mortem examinations. Significant discrepancies between the two documents were observed in 50% of patients. In 25%, the immediate cause of death was incorrectly stated on the certificate, having been assigned to a different organ system in the majority of those cases. In 33%, there was disagreement on major disease other than the immediate cause of death. In 9%, the death certificate was signed before the autopsy was performed. The extent of disagreement was largely independent of whether the certificate was signed before or after the autopsy. We conclude that: (1) there is a significant discrepancy between autopsy diagnoses and entries on death certificates; (2) disagreement is not due to unavailability of autopsy data at the time of completion of the certificate; (3) death certificates should be completed or amended utilizing data gained at autopsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson RE (1978) The autopsy — benefits to society. Am J Clin Pathol 69:239–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RE, Hill RB (1989) The current status of the autopsy in academic Medical Centers in the United States. Am J Clin Pathol 92:S31-S37

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay THC, Phillips AJ (1962) The accuracy of cancer diagnosis on death certificates. Cancer 15:5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Battle RM, Pathak D, Humble CG, Key CR, Vanatta PR, Hill RB, Anderson RE (1987) Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses. JAMA 258:339–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner P, Schilling A (1984) Zur Epidemiologie der Sektionsverweigerung. Pathologe 5:235–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron HM, McGoogan E (1981a) A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies. I. Inaccuracies in death certification. J Pathol 133:273–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron HM, McGoogan E (1981b) A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies. II. Analysis of inaccuracies in clinical diagnoses and their significance. J Pathol 133:285–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron HM, McGoogan E, Clarke J, Wilson BA (1977) Trends in hospital necropsy rates: Scotland 1961–74. BMJ 1:1577–1580

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan AL (1984) Morality dissected: a plea for reform of current policies with respect to autopsy. Hum Pathol 15:1105–1106

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial (1988) Autopsy Frequency — United States, 1980–1985. JAMA 259:2357–2362

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards Dismuke S, VanderZwaag R (1984) Accuracy and epidemiological implications of the death certificate diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. J Chron Dis 37:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel LW, Strauchen JA, Chiazze L, Heid M (1980) Accuracy of death certification in an autopsied population with specific attention to malignant neoplasms and vascular diseases. Am J Epidemiol 111:99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobbato F, Vecchiet F, Barbierato D, Melato M, Manconi R (1982) Inaccuracy of death certificate diagnosis in malignancy. Hum Pathol 13:1036–1038

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M (1983) The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 308:1000–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallgrimsson J (1981) The high autopsy frequency provides important material for research (in Danish). Nord Med 96:136–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RB, Anderson RE (1988) The autopsy — medical practice and public policy. Butterworth, Boston, pp 158–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson JG, Björnsson J (1991) Autopsy: clinicopathological concordance and imaging techniques. In: Riboli E, Delendi M (eds) Autopsy in epidemiology and medical research. Lyon, IARC, pp 91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Kircher T (1990) The autopsy and vital statistics. Hum Pathol 21:166–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Kircher T, Nelson J, Burdo H (1985) The autopsy as a measure of accuracy of the death certificate. N Engl J Med 313:1263–1269

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RS, Maisel JC, Dart GA, Silvers GW (1971) The accuracy of the death certificate in reporting cause of death in adults. Am Rev Respir Dis 104:844–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollo F, Bertoldo E, Grandi G, Cavallo F (1986) Reliability of death certifications for different types of cancer. Pathol Res Pract 181:442–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemetz PN, Ludwig J, Kurland LT (1987) Assessing the autopsy. Am J Pathol 128:362–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts WC (1978) The autopsy: its decline and a suggestion for its revival. N Engl J Med 299:332–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman I (1974) True incidence of pulmonary embolization and vital statistics. JAMA 230:1677–1679

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetli CV, Mittleman RE, Rao VJ (1988) Practical forensic pathology. Igaku-Shoin, New York, pp 2–3

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (1979) Medical certification of causes of death. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nielsen, G.P., Björnsson, J. & Jonasson, J.G. The accuracy of death certificates. Vichows Archiv A Pathol Anat 419, 143–146 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01600228

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01600228

Key words

Navigation