Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching engineering design: Can reading a textbook make a difference?

  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teaching design is an integral part of most engineering curricula. Often, students are introduced to the engineering design process through a chapter in a textbook. Does this passive approach to teaching an active process aid the students' learning? An experiment was conducted to assess what students learn about the design process when they read a text. Here, 10 students enrolled in a freshman course were asked to read aloud from a freshmen engineering textbook. Half of the subjects read the text prior to solving three open-ended engineering design problems and the other half solved the same problems before they read the text. Both the subjects' process in solving the problems, as well as the quality of their solutions (the product), are assessed. Results show that subjects that read the text before they solved the three problems spent significantly more time solving the problems and were more sophisticated in their problem solving strategies. These subjects also scored better when judged on the quality of their approach to the problem (including the number of design criteria considered, communications, assumptions, and technical accuracy). However, these subjects did not score better on a quality measure of the final solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dally, J. W.; Cunniff, P. F. (1995) A new course: product engineering and manufacturing. ASEE annual conference proceedings pp 1293–1298

  2. Dally, J. W.; Zhang, G. M. A freshman engineering design course Journal of Engineering Education, April 1993; 82(2): 83–91

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dym, C. L. Teaching design to freshmen: style and content. Journal of Engineering Education October 1994; 83(4): 303–310

    Google Scholar 

  4. Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) (1995) A new undergraduate curriculum. Carnegie Mellon University 1995

  5. Engineering Coalition of Schools for Excellence in Education and Leadership (ECSEL). Resource guide: engineering student design competitions. June 1994

  6. Hirt, D. E.; Barron, C. H. Jr. Evolving design projects in the engineering curriculum. The Innovator (SUCCEED Coalition Newsletter) Winter 1995; 4: 1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hsi, S.; Agogino, A. M. (1995) Scaffolding knowledge integration through designing multimedia case studies of engineering design, Frontiers in education conference proceedings, 4d1.1–4d1.8

  8. Wujek, J. H.; Schwarz, S. E.; Auslander, D. M. Emulating industrial prototyping: Berkeley's engineering design studio. Proceedings of the 1994 frontiers in education conference pp 543–547

  9. Bordogna, J.; Fromm, E.; Ernst, E. W. Engineering education: innovation through integration. Journal of Engineering Education January 1993; 82(1): 3–8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engineering education for a changing world. Report from the Engineering Deans Council and Corporate Roundtable of the American Society for Engineering Education, October, 1994.

  11. National Research Council. Engineering education: designing an adaptive system. National Academy Press, Washington DC 1995

    Google Scholar 

  12. National Science Foundation, restructuring engineering education: a focus on change, Division of Undergraduate Education, Directorate for Education and Human Resources 1995

  13. Badiru, A. B.; Baxi, H. J. Industrial engineering education for the 21st century. Industrial Engineering July 1994; 66–68

  14. Dixon, J. R.; Duffey, M. R. The neglect of engineering design. California Management Review Winter, 1990; 32(2): 9–23

    Google Scholar 

  15. Christiaans, H. H. C. M.; Dorst, K. H. (1992) Cognitive models in industrial design engineering: a protocol study. Design Theory and Methodology 42: 131–140

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ennis, C. W. Jr.; Gyeszly, S. W. (1991) Protocol analysis of the engineering systems design process. Research in Engineering Design 3: 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guindon, R. (1990) Designing the design process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human-Computer Interaction 5: 305–344

    Google Scholar 

  18. James, C. M.; Goldman, S. R.; Vandermolen, H. The role of planning in simple digital circuit design. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association April 1994

  19. Rowland, G. (1992) What do instructional designers actually do? Performance Improvement Quarterly 5(2): 65–86

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sutcliffe, A. G.; Maiden, N. A. M. (1992) Analysing the novice analyst: cognitive models in software engineering. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 36: 719–740

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tang, J. C.; Leifer, L. J. (1991) An observational methodology for studying group design activity. Research in Engineering Design 3: 209–219

    Google Scholar 

  22. Finger, S.; Dixon, J. R. (1989) A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part I: Descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design processes. Research in Engineering Design 1: 51–67

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mullins, C. A.; Atman, C. J. (1996) Freshmen engineers' strategies and performance on design problems. Working Paper, University of Pittsburgh

  24. Ericsson, K. A.; Simon, H. A. (1993) Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chi, M. T. H. Analyzing the content of verbal data to represent knowledge: a practical guide. Submitted to Journal of the Learning Sciences June 1994

  26. Schriver, K. A. (1989) Evaluating text quality: the continuum from text-focused to reader-focused methods. IEEE Transactions in Professional Communication 32(4): 238–255

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mullins, C. A.; Atman, C. J. (1994) Freshmen engineer's strategies for solving open-ended problems ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 220–224

  28. ECSEL. (1993) Introduction to design engineering active learning modules: a catalogue. ECSEL National Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moore, P. L.; Atman, C. J.; Bursic, K. M.; Shuman, L. J.; Gottfried, B. S. (1995) Do freshmen design texts adequately define the engineering design process? ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 164–171

  30. Wright, P. H. (1994) Introduction to engineering, 2nd en., John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Laszlo, J.; Meutsch, D.; Viehoff, R. (1988) Verbal reports as data in text comprehension research: an introduction. Text 8(4): 283–294

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ericsson, K. A. (1988) Concurrent verbal reports on text comprehension: a review. Text 8(4): 295–325

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schriver, K. (1991) Plain language through protocol-aided revision. In: Steinberg, E. (ed.) Plain language: principles and practice. Wayne State University Press pp 148–172

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was made possible by National Science Foundation grants RED-9358516 and DUE-9254271 as well as grants from the Ford Motor Company Fund, GE Fund, Westinghouse Foundation, and Xerox Corporation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atman, C.J., Bursic, K.M. Teaching engineering design: Can reading a textbook make a difference?. Research in Engineering Design 8, 240–250 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01597230

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01597230

Keywords

Navigation