Skip to main content
Log in

Minimum-weight two-connected spanning networks

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of constructing a minimum-weight, two-connected network spanning all the points in a setV. We assume a symmetric, nonnegative distance functiond(·) defined onV × V which satisfies the triangle inequality. We obtain a structural characterization of optimal solutions. Specifically, there exists an optimal two-connected solution whose vertices all have degree 2 or 3, and such that the removal of any edge or pair of edges leaves a bridge in the resulting connected components. These are the strongest possible conditions on the structure of an optimal solution since we also show thatany two-connected graph satisfying these conditions is theunique optimal solution for a particular choice of ‘canonical’ distances satisfying the triangle inequality. We use these properties to show that the weight of an optimal traveling salesman cycle is at most 4/3 times the weight of an optimal two-connected solution; examples are provided which approach this bound arbitrarily closely. In addition, we obtain similar results for the variation of this problem where the network need only span a prespecified subset of the points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell Laboratories, “The traveling salesman problem: 1934–1978,” Bibliography No. 367 (Holmdel, NY, 1979).

  2. C. Berge,Graphs and Hypergraphs (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Bienstock, E.F. Brickell and C.L. Monma, “Properties ofk-connected networks,”SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, to appear.

  4. N. Christofides, “Worst-case analysis of a new heuristic for the traveling salesman problem,” Technical Report, GSIA, Carnegie-Mellon University (Pittsburgh, PA, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Christofides, “The traveling salesman problem,” in: N. Christofides et al., eds.,Combinatorial Optimization (Wiley, New York, 1979) pp. 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Christofides and C.A. Whitlock, “Network synthesis with connectivity constraints—A survey,” in: J.P. Brans, ed.,Operational Research '81 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981) pp. 705–723.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Cornuéjols, J. Fonlupt and D. Naddef, “The traveling salesman problem on a graph and some related integer polyhedra,”Mathematical Programming 33 (1985) 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Cornuéjols and G.L. Nemhauser, “Tight bounds on Christofides' traveling salesman heuristic,”Mathematical Programming 14 (1978) 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Crowder and M.W. Padberg, “Solving large-scale symmetric traveling salesman problems to optimality,”Management Science 26 (1980) 495–509.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G.B. Dantzig, D.R. Fulkerson and S.M. Johnson, “On a linear programming, combinatorial approach to the traveling salesman problem,”Operations Research 7 (1959) 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S.E. Dreyfus and R.A. Wagner, “The Steiner problem in graphs,”Networks 1 (1971) 195–207.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Edmonds, “Maximum matching and a polytope with 0-1 vertices,”Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards 698 (1965) 125–130.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.E. Erickson, C.L. Monma and A.F. Veinott Jr., “Send-and-split method for minimum-concave-cost network flows,”Mathematics of Operations Research 12 (1987) 634–664.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K.P. Eswaran and R.E. Tarjan, “Augmentation problems,”SIAM Journal on Computing 5 (1976) 653–665.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G.N. Frederickson and J. Ja'Ja', “On the relationship between the biconnectivity augmentation and traveling salesman problem,”Theoretical Computer Science 13 (1982) 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.M. Frieze, “Worst-case analysis of algorithms for traveling salesman problems,”Operational Research Verfahren 32 (1979) 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.M. Frieze, G. Galbiati and F. Maffioli, “On the worst-case performance of some algorithms for the asymmetric traveling salesman problems,”Networks 12 (1982) 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson,Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (Freeman, San Francisco, CA, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  19. E.N. Gilbert and H.O. Pollak, “Steiner minimal trees,”SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 16 (1968) 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.L. Graham and P. Hell, “On the history of the minimum spanning tree problem,”Annals of the History of Computing 7 (1985) 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Grötschel and C.L. Monma, “Integer polyhedra arising from certain network design problems with connectivity constraints,”SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, to appear.

  22. M. Grötschel and M.W. Padberg, “On the symmetric traveling salesman problem I: Inequalities,”Mathematical Programming 16 (1979) 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Grötschel and M.W. Padberg, “On the symmetric traveling salesman problem II: Lifting theorems and facets,”Mathematical Programming 16 (1979) 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  24. E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan and D.B. Shmoys, eds.,The Traveling Salesman Problem (Wiley, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. Lovász, “On some connectivity properties of Eulerian graphs,”Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 28 (1976) 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  26. C.L. Monma and D.F. Shallcross, “Methods for designing survivable communication networks,”Operations Research (1989).

  27. C.L. Monma and J.B. Sidney, “Sequencing with series-parallel precedence constraints,”Mathematics of Operations Research 4 (1979) 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. Naddef and W.R. Pulleyblank, “Matching in regular graphs,”Discrete Mathematics 34 (1981) 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. Papadimitriou and U.V. Vazirani, “On two geometric problems related to the traveling salesman problem,”Journal of Algorithms 5 (1984) 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  30. R.G. Parker and R.L. Rardin, “The traveling salesman problem: An update of research,”Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 30 (1983) 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J.S. Provan, “Convexity and the Steiner tree problem,”Networks 18 (1988) 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  32. W.R. Pulleyblank, “On minimizing setups in precedence constrained scheduling,” Operations Research Technical Report 81185, University of Bonn (Bonn, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  33. D. J. Rosenkrantz, R.E. Stearns and P.M. Lewis II, “An analysis of several heuristics for the traveling salesman problem,”SIAM Journal on Computing 6 (1977) 563–581.

    Google Scholar 

  34. K. Steiglitz, P. Weiner and D.J. Kleitman, “The design of minimum cost survivable networks,”IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory 16 (1969) 455–460.

    Google Scholar 

  35. K. Takamizawa, T. Nishizek and N. Saito, “Linear-time computability of combinational problems on series parallel graphs,”Journal ACM 29 (1982) 632–641.

    Google Scholar 

  36. J.A. Wald and C. Colbourn, “Steiner trees in outerplanar graphs,”Congressus Numeratum 36 (1982) 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Monma, C.L., Munson, B.S. & Pulleyblank, W.R. Minimum-weight two-connected spanning networks. Mathematical Programming 46, 153–171 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01585735

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01585735

Key words

Navigation