Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of non-Gaussian multicomponent and periodic autoregressive models for river flow

  • Originals
  • Published:
Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Non-Gaussian Multicomponent model for river flow (NGM) of Vandewiele and Dom is modified in order to facilitate maximum likelihood estimation. It is also generalized so that a wider variety of river flows at a diversity of time steps can be modeled. This model is applied to two basins in Belgium and France with very different areas, both at monthly and weekly time scale. Results on the quality of forecasting and simulation (especially simulation of low and high flow volumes) are compared with those of classical Periodic Autoregressive models (PAR). Results with NGM are always better, in most cases considerably better. This is due to the fact that NGM models explicitly take into consideration the presence of so called flow components, like baseflow and direct flow recession, which are phenomena well known to hydrologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bard, Y. 1974: Nonlinear parameter estimation. Academic, San Diego, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, H. 1946: Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delleur, J. W.; Tao, P. C.; Kavvas, M. L. 1976: An evaluation of the practicality and the complexity of some rainfall and runoff time series models. Water Resour. Res. 12, 953–970

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottegoda, N. T. 1980: Stochastic water resources technology. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Noakes, D. J.; Mc Leod, A. I.; Hipel, K. W. 1985: Forecasting monthly riverflow time series. Int. J. Forecast., 1, 179–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Numerical Algorithms Group. 1983: NAG Library

  • Salas, J. D.; Boes, D. C.; Smith, R. A. 1982: Estimation of ARMA models with seasonal parameters. Water Resour. Res. 18, 1006–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H. A.; Fiering, M. B. 1962: Mathematical synthesis of stream flow sequences for the analysis of river basins by simulation. In: Design of Water Resources, edited by A. Maass et al., pp. 459–493. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandewiele, G. L.; Dom, A. 1989: A non-gaussian multicomponent model for river flow. Water Resour. Res. 25, 397–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandewiele, G. L.; Dom, A.; Eshete, Z. 1989: De Debietreeks van de Maas te Luik (The Flow Series of the Meuse at Liege, in Dutch). Tijdschrift der Openbare Werken van Belgie (Journal of Public Works of Belgium), Brussels, nr 4, 277–298

  • Wilks, S. S. 1962: Mathematical statistics. John Wiley, San Diego, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eshete, Z., Vandewiele, G.L. Comparison of non-Gaussian multicomponent and periodic autoregressive models for river flow. Stochastic Hydrol Hydraul 6, 223–238 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581618

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581618

Key words

Navigation