Abstract
This explanatory study was stimulated by an initiative of the Swedish National Board of Universities and Colleges (SNBUC) which had a twofold purpose. The first was to demonstrate a formalised assessment methodology with quantitative and qualitative measures for research. The second was to utilise standardised data integrating online input-output education/research information for periodic updating use by SNBUC in the future. Although this analysis demonstrates the methodology, the data set is small and narrow in scope and the conclusions are, therefore, tentative particularly with respect to regional issues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn T, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1988) Some Statistical and DEA Evaluations of Relative Efficiencies of Public and Private Institutions of High Learning. Soc Econ Plann Sc 22(6):259–269
Ahn T, Seiford LM (forthcoming) Sensitivity of DEA to Models and Variable Sets in a Hypothesis Test Setting: The Efficiency of University Operations. In: Creative and Innovative Approaches to the Science of Management Ijiri Y (ed)
Aigner DJ, Chu SF (1958) On estimating the industry-production function. Am Econ Rev 13:826–839
Ali IA (1990) Data Envelopment Analysis: Computational Issues. J Comp Environ Urban Syst 14(2):157–165
Anderson AE (1988) Universitet, Regionplanekontoret. Stockholm, Sweden
Bauer M (1988) Evaluation in Swedish Higher Education: Recent Trends and The Outlines of a Model. Eur J Educ 23:16
Bessent A, Bessent W, Kennington J, Reagan B (1982) An Application of Mathematical Programming to Assess Productivity in the Houston Independent School District. Manag Sci 28:1355–1367
Bessent A, Bessent W, Elam J, Long D (1984) Educational Productivity Council Employs Management Science Methods to Improve Educational Quality. Interfaces 14:1–8
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY, Seiford LM (eds) (forthcoming) Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory. Methodology and Applications Chap 1: Basic DEA Models: 1–25
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring Efficiency of Decision-Making Units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1981) Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through. Manag Sci 27(6):668–697
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rousseau J, Samle J (1987) DEA and Axiomatic Notions of Efficiency and Reference sets. Research Report CCS 558, UT at Austin, Austin, Texas
Cleary FR, Edwards DJ (1960) The Origin of the Contributions to the A.E.R. During the Fifties. Am Econ Rev 50(5):1011–1014
Davis P, Papanek GF (1984) Faculty Ratings of Major Economics Departments by Citations. Am Econ Rev 74(1):225–230
Debreu G (1951) The Coefficients of Resource Utilisation. Econometrica 19:273–292
Färe R, Hunsaker W (1986) Notions of Efficiency and Their Reference Sets. Manag Sci 32(2):237–243
Färe R, Knox Lovell CA (1978) Measuring the Technical Efficeicny of Production. J Econ Theory 19:150–162
Farrell MJ (1957) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. J R Stat Soc 120(3):253–282
Farrell MJ, Fieldhouse M (1962) Estimating Efficient Production Functions under increasing Returns to Scale. J R Stat Soc 125(2):252–261
Forsund F, Hjalmarsson L (1981) A Putty-Clay Approach. IUI, Stockholm
Forsund FR, Knox ILovell CA, Schmidt P (1980) A Survey of Frontier Production Functions and Their Relationship to Efficiency Measurement. J Econ 13:5–25
Franke-Wikberg S (1989) Att bedoma undervisningskvalitet på institutionsniva. UHA, Arbetsrapport 6, Stockholm
Frisch RAK (1965) Theory of Production. Dordrecht Holland, D. Reidel
Fusfeld DR (1956) The Program of the American Economic Association Meetings. Am Econ Rev 46(4):642–644
Garfield E (1963) Citation Indexes in Sociological and Historical Research. Am Docum 14(4):89–102
Golany B, Learner DB, Phillips FY, Rousseau JJ (1990) Managing Service Productivity: The Data Envelopment Analysis Perspective. Comp Environ Urban Syst 14(2):89–102
Golden J, Carstensen FV, Weiner P, Kane S (1988) Modeling the Rating Game. Q Rev Econ Bus 28(1):101–109
Grosskopf S (1986) The Role of the Reference Technology in Measuring Production Efficiency. Econ J 96:499–513
Hanushek E (1979) Conceptual and Empirical Issues in the Estimation of Educational Production Functions. J Hum Res Summer 14:351–388
Haynes KE, Stough RR, Shroff HEF (1990) Special Issue: New Methodology in Context: Data Envelopment Analysis. J Comp Environ Urban Syst 14(2):85–175
Holzer M, Lane FS (1978) Special Issues: Productivity in Higher Education. Publ Prod Rev 2(5):1–94
Jennegren LP, Obel B (1985) Forskningsevaluering. Ekon og Pol 59
Kash DE (1989) Perpetual Innovation: the New World of Competition. Basic Books, New York
Koopmans TC (1951) Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation: Proceedings of a Conference. Yale University Press, New Haven
Lane JE (1983) Creating the University of Norrland, Lund, Liber
Levin HM (1974) Measuring efficiency in educational productions. Publ Fin Q 2(1):3
Liebowitz SJ, Palmer JR (1988) Assessing Assessments of Economics Departments. Q Rev Econ Bus 28(2):88–113
Lovell MC (1973) The production of economic literature: an Interpretation. J Econ Lit 11(1):27–55
Ludwig WG, Guthrie TL (1989) Assessing Productivity with Data Envelopment Analysis. Publ Prod Rev 12(4):361–372
Meadows AJ (1972) Science and Controversy: a Biography of Sir Norman Lockyer. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
National Science Foundation (1987) Policy Research and Analysis Division, Discussion of Meetings on Internal Review of Higher Education Productivity, P. House, Chair, April
OECD (1982) Location of high technology firms and regional economic development, Paris Pastor JT (forthcoming) New DEA Additive Models for Handling Zero and Negative Data. J Sp Oper Res
Persson O (1986) Online Bibliometrics. Scientometr 10
Petry G, Settle J (1988) A Comprehensive Analysis of Worldwide Scholarly Productivity in Selected U.S. Business Journals. Q Rev Econ Bus 28(3):90–104
Price DJ de Solla (1961) Science Since Babylon. Yale University Press, New Haven
Quandt RE (1976) Some Quantitative Aspects of the Economics Journal Literature. J Polit Econ 84(4):741–755
Rhodes E (1978) Data Envelopment Analysis and Related Approaches for Measuring Efficiency of Decision-making Units with an Application to Program Follow-through in U.S. Education“ Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie-Mellon University
Sarafoglou N (1988) Measuring the ‘Unmeasurable’: Productivity in Building Sector Research. Working Paper from CERUM No.18, Umea, Sweden
Sarafoglou N, Haynes KE (1990) Regional Efficiencies of Building Sector Research in Sweden: An Introduction. J Comp Environ Urban Syst 114(2):117–132
Sarafoglou N, Haynes KE (1991) Forskningens Effektivitet vid Nationalekonomiska och Foretagsekonomiska Institutioner i Sverige. Ekonomisk Debatt, no. 3:239–243
Seiford LM (1990) Models, Extentions and Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis. J Comp Environ Urban Syst 14(2):171–175
Sharda R (1984) Linear Programming on Microcomputers: a Survey. Interfaces 14:27–38
Stahl MJ, Leap TL, Wei ZZ (1988) Publication in Leading Management Journals as a Measure of Institutional Research Productivity. Acad Manag J 31(3):707–720
Stigler G (1965) Essays in the History of Economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill
Stolp C (1990) Strenghts and Weaknesses of Data Envelopment Analysis: An Urban and Regional Perspective. J Comp Environ Urban Syst 14(2):103–116
Thrull M (1991) Significance of Zeros in Data and Multipliers. ORSA/TIMS Presentation, Anaheim, CA, April
Tone K (forthcoming) Data Envelopment Analysis — Models, Algorithms and Applications, Kluwer UHA (1987) Aret som gick. Rapport 12, Stockholm
Wibe S (1987) Storlek, kostnader, och produktivitet inom hogskolesektorn. PM, Umea University, Umea
Womer NK, Shroff HEF, Gulledge TR, Haynes KE (1995) Efficiency Measurement with Linear Economic models. The Institute of Public Policy, George Mason University, Working Paper 14, Fair-fax
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sarafoglou, N., Haynes, K.E. University productivity in Sweden: a demonstration and explanatory analysis for economics and business programs. Ann Reg Sci 30, 285–304 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580523
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580523