Abstract
A synthesis of the literature on knowledge dissemination and use in education, notably in science and mathematics, is presented. Perspectives have changed in the ways in which knowledge and products are seen to reach potential users. From the top-down, linear models, we have come closer to bottom-up approaches and to the crucial role of linking agents. At present, the most influential approach is a “constructivist” one, whereby research and other kinds of specialized knowledge is exchanged between researchers and professionals in a mutually constructed social context. While there is still debate over the best predictors of successful knowledge use, the scope of the field has been considerably enlarged by including users' perspectives. To some extent then, specialists in this field are now working in a new paradigm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. D. (1984). Selecting interventions for improving science education. In Bybee, R. W., Carlson, J., and McCormack, A. J. (Eds.),NSTA Yearbook: Redesigning Science and Technology Education. National Science Teachers Association, Washington, DC.
Anderson, R. D., Varanaka-Martin, M., Romagrano, L., Bielenberg, J., Mieras, B., Witworth, J. (1992). Review of the literature pertaining to curriculum reform in science, mathematics and higher-order thinking across the disciplines. The Curriculum Reform Project, The University of Colorado.
Arzi, H. J., White, R. T., and Fensham, P. J. (1987). Teachers' knowledge of science: an account of a longitudinal study in progress. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC (quoted in Tobin and Espinet, 1989).
Berman, P., and McLaughlin, M. (1978).Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. 3. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica.
Beyer, M., and Trice, H. (1982). The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings.Administrative Science Quarterly 27: 597–622.
Carlson, R. (1965).Adoption of Educational Innovations. University of Oregon Press, Eugene.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., and Yackel, E. (1990). Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers. Davis, R. B. Maher, C. A. and Noddings, N. (Eds.),Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc., Reston, Virginia.
Cohen, D. K., and Ball, D. L. (1990). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12(3): 249–256.
Confrey, J. (1990). What constructivism implies for teaching. In Davis, R., Maher, C., and Noddings, N. (Eds.),Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph No. 4, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia, pp. 107–122.
Cox, P. L., Kahn, K. A., and French, L. C. (1985). A study of clients of informational service providers and their use of ERIC-based resources and services.Making the Match for Use of Educational Information: A Multimethodological Study of Providers and Users of ERIC-based Resources and Services, Vol. 3. The NETWORK, Inc., Andover, Massachusetts.
Crandall, D. P. (1984). School improvement: What the research says. Keynote address presented at the April 1984 conference on School Excellence, Sponsored by the Appalachia Educational Laboratory, Charleston, West Virginia.
Crandall, D. P., (1982).A Study of Dissemination Efforts Supporting School Improvement, Vols. 3–4. The NETWORK, Inc. Andover, Massachusetts.
Crandall, D. P., and Loucks, S. F. (1983).People, Policies and Practices: Examining the Chain of School Improvement, Vols. I–X. The NETWORK, Inc., Andover, Massachusetts (quoted in Louis and Dentler, 1988).
Cuban, L. (1990). A fundamental puzzle of school reform. In Lieberman, A. (Ed.),Schools as Collaborative Cultures: Creating the Future Now. The Falmer Press, New York, pp. 71–77.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Instructional policy into practice: The power of the bottom over the top.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12(3): 233–241.
Darling-Hammond, L., and Berry, B. (1988).The Evolution of Teacher Policy. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California (quoted in Darling-Hammond, 1990).
Davis, R. B. (1990). Discovery learning and constructivism. In Davis, R., Maher, C., and Noddings, N. (Eds.),Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph No. 4, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia, pp. 93–106.
Davis, R., Maher, C., and Noddings, N. (Eds.) (1990).Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia.
Davis, H. R., and Salasin, S. E. (1978). Strengthening the contribution of social R&D to policy making. In Lynn, L. E. Jr. (Ed.),Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
Driver, R. (1983). The Pupil as Scientist?, The Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England.
Dunn, W. N., and Holzner, B. (1988). Knowledge in society: Anatomy of an emergent field.Knowledge in Society, Spring: 3–26.
Duschl, R. A. (1990).Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development, Teachers College Press, Columbia University, New York.
Emrick, J., and Peterson, S. (1978). A Synthesis of Findings Across Five Recent Studies in Educational Dissemination and Change. Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, San Francisco.
Fullan, M., and Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation.Review of Educational Research 47(1): 335–397.
Fullan, J. G., and Steigelbauer, S. (1991).The New Meaning of Educational Change, Teachers College Press, Columbia University, New York.
Guba, E. (1968). The process of educational innovation. In Goulet, R. (Ed.),Educational Change, Citation Press, New York, pp. 136–153.
Hall, G. E., and Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in Schools: Facilitating the Process, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Hall, G., and Loucks, S. (1978). Teacher concerns as a basis for facilitating and personalizing staff development.Teachers College Record 80(1): 36–53.
Hargreaves, A. (1984). Experience counts, theory doesn't: How teachers talk about their work.Sociology of education 57: 244–254 (quoted in Louis and Dentler, 1988).
Havelock, R. (1969). Planning for Innovation through Dissemination and Utilization of Knowledge, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Havelock, R. G. (1971). The utilization of educational research and development.British Journal of Educational Technology 2(2): 84–98.
Havelock, R. G. (1973). Planning for Innovation through Dissemination and Utilization of Knowledge, University of Michigan Center for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Hood, P. D. (1989). How can studies of information consumers be used to improve the education communication systems? presentation at the 1989 Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association in San Francisco.
Hord, S. M. (1989). Facilitating change in secondary schools —myths and management.NASSP Bulletin 173(516): 68–73.
Horst, D. P., Piestrup, A. M., Foat, C. M., and Binkley, J. L (1975).Evaluation of the Field Test of Project Information Packages, Volume II: Recommendations for Revisions, RMC Research Corp., Los Altos, California, and Stanford Research Institute Menlo Park, California.
Huberman, M. (1973). Experiments and innovation in education. Understanding change in Education: An Introduction, The Unesco Press, Paris.
Huberman, M. (1983). Recipes for busy kitchens: A situational analysis of routine knowledge use in schools.Knowledge 4(4): 478–510.
Huberman, M. (19985). What knowledge is of most worth to teachers: A knowledge use perspective. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Meetings, April (quoted in Louis and Dentler, 1988).
Huberman, M. (1987). Steps toward an integrated model of knowledge utilization.Knowledge 18(4): 586–611.
Huberman, M. (1989). Predictors of conceptual effects in reserch utilization.Knowledge in Society 2(3): 6–24.
Huberman, M. (1990). Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study.American Educational Research Journal, 27(2): 363–391 (1990).
Huberman, M., and Crandall, D. P. (1982).People, Policies, and Practices: Examining the Chain of School improvement, Vol. IX: Implications for Action. The NETWORK, Inc., Andover, Massachusetts.
Huberman, M., and Miles, M. (1984).Innovation Up Close: How School Improvement Works. Plenum Press, New York.
Klein, S. S., and Gwaltney, M. K. (1991). Charting the education dissemination system: Where we are and where we go from here.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 12(3): 241–265.
Lieberman, A. (Ed.) (1990).Schools as Colloborative Cultures: Creating the Future Now. The Falmer Press, New York.
Loucks, S. (1983).Planning for Dissemination. Monograph 1. Chapel Hill: Technical Assistance Development System (TADS), Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center, North Carolina University.
Loucks-Horsley, S., and Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). Using knowledge of change to guide staff development. In Lieberman, A., and Miller, L. (Eds.),Staff Development for Education in the '90s: New Demands, New Realities, New Perspective, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
Louis, K. S. (1980).The Role of External Agents in Knowledge Utilization, Problem Solving and Implementation of New Programs in Local School Contexts, Far West Lab for Educational Research and Development, San Francisco. ERIC ED203462.
Louis, K. S., and Dentler, R. A. (1988). Knowledge use and school improvement.Curriculum Inquiry 18(1): 34–62.
Louis, K. S., and Rosenblum, S. (1981).Designing and Managing Interorganizational Networks. Abt Associates, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Louis, K. S., Rosenblum, S., Molitor, J. A. et al. (1981).Strategies for Knowledge Use and School Improvement. National Institute of Education, Washington, DC.
Louis, K. S., Dentler, R. A., and Kell, D. G. (1984). Putting knowledge to work, issues in education dissemination. Final report, NIE, AAI. No. 85-6. Abt Associates, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Lynn, L. E., Jr (Ed.). (1978).Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection. Washington, DC. National Academy of Sciences.
Lythcott, J., and Duschl, R. (1990). Qualitative research: From methods to conclusions.Science Education 74(4): 445–460.
Maher, C., and Alston, A. (1990). Teacher development in mathematics in a constructivist framework. In Davis, R. B., Maher, C., and Noddings, N. (Eds.),Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph No. 4, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia, pp. 147–165.
Mann, D. (1978). The user driven systems and a modest proposal. In Mann, D. (Ed.),Making Change Happen, Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 285–307 (quoted in Louis and Dentler, 1988).
McClure, R. M. (1991). Individual growth and institutional renewal. In Lieberman, A., and Miller, L. (Eds.),Staff Development for Education in the '90s: New Demands, New Realities, New Perspectives, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, pp. 221–241.
Menlo, A. (1985). A reconceptualization of resistance to change and its application to the institutionalization process. Paper presented to the International School Improvement Project, Lucerne, Switzerland, June (quoted in Louis and Dentler, 1988).
Miles, M. (1983). Unraveling the mystery of institutionalization.Education Leadership 41(3): 14–19.
Mort, P. (1964). Studies in educational innovation from the Institute of Administrative Research. In Miles, M. (Ed.),Innovation in Education, Teachers College Press, New York.
Muthard, J., and Felice, K. (1982). Assessing activities for utilization of rehabilitation research.Knowledge 4(2): 309–328.
Nelson, M., and Sieber, S. (1976). Innovation in urban secondary schools.School Review 27: 101–119 (quoted in Louis and Dentler, 1988).
Pines, A. L., and West, L. H. (1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a sources-of-knowledge framework.Science Education 70(5): 583–604.
Rogers, E. (1988). The intellectual foundation and history of the agricultural extension model.Knowledge 9(4): 492–510.
Rogers, E. M., and Kincaid, D. L. (1981).Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research, Free Press, New York.
Rogers, E., and Shoemaker, F. F. (1971).Communications of Innovations, Free Press, New York.
Sarason, S. (1971).The Culture of the School and the Problem of Change, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
Sarason, S., Carroll, D., Maton, K., Cohen, S., and Lorentz, E. (1977).Human Services and Resource Networks, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Schlechty, P. C. (1990).Schools for the Twenty-First Century, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Schuell, T. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning.Review of Educational Research, 56: 411–436.
Sieber, S. D. (1981). Knowledge utilization in public education: Incentives and disincentives. In Lehming, R., and Kane, M. (Eds.),Improving Schools: Using What we Know, Sage, Beverly Hills, California, pp. 115–167 (quoted in Louis and Dentler, 1988).
Sieber, S., Louis, K., and Meretzger, L. (1972).The Use of Educational Knowledge: Evaluation of the Pilot State Dissemination Program, Vols. 1 & 2, Columbia University, Bureau of Applied Social Research, New York.
Steffe, L. P. (1983). The teaching experiment methodology in a constructivist research program. In Zweng, M., Green, T., Kilpatrick, J., Pollak, H., and Suydam, M. (Eds.),Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education, Birkhauser, Boston, pp. 469–4711.
Steffe, L. P., and Cobb, P. (1983). “The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder,”Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 83–94.
Sunesson, S., and Nilsson, K. (1989). Intervening factors in the utilization of social research.Knowledge in Society: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer 2(1): 42–56.
Sykes, G. (1990). Teaching incentives: Constraint and variety. In Lieberman, A. (Ed.),Schools as Collaborative Cultures: Creating the Future Now, The Falmer Press, New York, pp. 103–125.
Tobin, K. (1987). Teaching for high-level cognitive learning in high school science? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Washington, DC.
Tobin, K., and Espinet, M. (1989). Impediments to change: Applications of coaching in high school science teaching.Journal of Research in Science Teaching 26(2): 105–120.
Weiss, C. H. (1977). Research for policy's sake: The enlightenment function of social research.Policy Analysis 3: 531–545.
Weiss, C. H. (1986). The circuity of enlightenment: Diffusion of social science research to policy makers.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8(2): 274–281.
Weiss, C. H., and Bucuvalas, M. J. (1980).Social Science Research and Decision-Making, Columbia University Press, New York.
Wheatley, G. J. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning.Science Education 75(1): 9–21.
Yin, R., and Moore, G. (1985).The Utilization of Research: Lessons for the Natural Hazards Field, Cosmos Corp., Washington, DC.
Yin, R. K., Quick, S. K., Bateman, P. M., and Marks, E. L. (1978).Changing Urban Bureaucracies: How New Practices Become Routinized, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, and D. C. Heath, Lexington, Massachusetts.
Zaltman, G. (1983). In Seidman, E. (Ed.),Theory-in-use Among Change Agents in Handbook of Community and Social Intervention, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Prepared for the Directorate of Education and Human Resources, Division of Research, Evaluation and Dissemination, National Science Foundation by The Network, May 1993.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hutchinson, J.R., Huberman, M. Knowledge dissemination and use in science and mathematics education: A literature review. J Sci Educ Technol 3, 27–47 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575814
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575814