Skip to main content
Log in

Yeast communities associated withDrosophila species and related flies in an eastern oak-pine forest: A comparison with western communities

  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology

Summary

Intestinal yeast mycobiota were studied in 14 species ofDrosophila and in the drosophilid speciesChymomyza amoena, captured at Pinery Provincial Park, Ontario. Over 56 yeast species, some undescribed, were isolated. These yeast communities were compared with those from two similar surveys conducted in western portions of North America. The community structures were influenced significantly by the habitat rather than phylogeny of the flies. Geographic separation was a factor affecting yeast taxa frequencies in the fly species, but it was largely overshadowed by ecological factors when the communities were described physiologically. The notion that habitats are filled by yeasts which add up to a suitable physiological potential, more or less independently of their taxonomic affinities, was thus confirmed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Band, H.T. and R.N. Band. 1980. Overwintering ofChymonyza amoena larvae in apples in Michigan and preliminary studies on the mechanism of cold hardiness. Experientia 36: 1182–1183.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnett, J.A., R.W. Payne and D. Yarrow. 1979. A Guide to Identifying and Classifying Yeasts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baumberger, J.P. 1919. A nutritional study of insects, with special reference to microorganisms and their substrata. J. Experimental Zoology 28: 1–81.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Begon, M. 1982. Yeast andDrosophila. In: The Genetics and Biology ofDrosophila, Vol. 3 (Ashburner, M., H.L. Carson and J.N. Thompson Jr, eds), pp. 345–384, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bowles, J.M. and M.A. Lachance. 1983. Patterns of variation in the yeast florae of exudates in an oak community. Can. J. Microbiol. 61: 2984–2995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carson, H.L. 1971. The ecology ofDrosophila breeding sites. Univ. Hawaii, Harold L. Lyon Arboretum Lecture 2: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carson, H.L. and H.D. Stalker. 1951. Natural breeding sites for some wild species ofDrosophila in the eastern United States. Ecology 32: 317–330.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ganter, P.F., W.T. Starmer, M.A. Lachance and H.J. Phaff. 1986. Yeast communities from host plants and associatedDrosophila in southern Arizona: new isolations and analysis of the relative importance of hosts and vectors on community composition. Oecologia 70: 386–392.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gigioli, I. 1897. Insects and yeasts. Nature 56: 575–577.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert, D.G. 1980. Dispersal of yeasts and bacteria byDrosophila in a temperate forest. Oecologia 46: 135–137.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heed, W.B. 1978. Ecology and genetics of Sonoran DesertDrosophila. In: Ecological Genetics: the Interface (Brussard, P.F., ed.), pp. 109–126, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heed, H.B. 1982. The origin ofDrosophila in the Sonoran Desert. In: Ecological Genetics and Evolution: the Cactus-Yeast-Drosophila Model System (Barker, J.S.F. and W.T. Starmer, eds), pp. 65–80. Academic Press, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heed, W.B., W.T. Starmer, M.G. Miranga, M.W. Miller and H.J. Phaff. 1976. An analysis of the yeast flora associated with cactiphilicDrosophila and their host plants in the Sonoran Desert and its relation to temperate and tropical associations. Ecology 57: 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hill, M.O. 1973. Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination. J. Ecol. 61: 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hurlbert, S.H. 1971. The non concept of species diversity; a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577–586.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lachaise, D., M.-C. Pignal and J. Rouault. 1979. Yeast flora partitioning by drosophilid species inhabiting a tropical African savanna of the Ivory coast. Annals. Soc. Ent. Fr. (N.S.) 15: 659–680.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lachance, M.A. 1980. Yeasts associated with black knot disease of trees. In: Current Developments in Yeast Research (Stewart, G.G. and I. Russell, eds), pp. 606–613. Pergamon, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lachance, M.A., B.J. Metcalf and W.T. Starmer. 1982. Yeasts from exudates ofQuercus, Populus, Pseudotsuga, andUlmus: new isolations and elucidation of some factors affecting ecological specificity. Microb. Ecol. 8: 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lachance, M.A. and W.T. Starmer. 1982. Evolutionary significance of physiological relationships among yeast communities associated with trees. Can. J. Microbiol. 60: 285–293.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lachance, M.A. and W.T. Starmer. 1986. The community concept and the problem of non-trivial characterization of yeast communities. Coenoses 1: 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Patterson, J.T. and W.S. Stone. 1952. Evolution in the GenusDrosophila. Macmillan Co., NY.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Phaff, H.J., M.W. Miller, J.A. Recca, M. Shifrine and E.M. Mrak. 1956. Studies on the ecology ofDrosophila in the Yosemite region of California. II. Yeasts found in the alimentary canal ofDrosophila. Ecology 37: 533–538.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shehata, A.M.E.T., E.M. Mrak and H.J. Phaff. 1955. Yeasts isolated fromDrosophila and their suspected feeding places in southern and central California. Mycologia 47: 799–811.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spieth, H.T. and W.B. Heed. 1975. TheDrosophila pinicola species group. Pan Pacific Entomologist 51: 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Starmer, W.T. 1981. A comparison ofDrosophila habitats according to the physiological attributes of the associated yeast communities. Evolution 35: 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Starmer, W.T., H.J. Phaff, M.G. Miranda, M.W. Miller and W.B. Heed. 1982. The yeast flora associated with decaying stems of columnar cacti andDrosophila in North America. Evol. Biol. 14: 269–295.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Starmer, W.T. and J.C. Fogleman. 1986. Coadaptation ofDrosophila and yeasts in their natural habitat. J. of Chem. Ecol. 12: 1035–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Starmer, W.T., M.A. Lachance, H.J. Phaff and W.B. Heed. 1990. The biogeography of yeasts associated with decaying cactus tissue in North America, the Caribbean and Northern Venezuela. Evolutionary Biology 24: 107–147.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Starmer, W.T., J.C. Fogleman and M.A. Lachance. 1991. The yeast community of cacti. In: Microbial Ecology of Leaves (Andrews, J.H. and S.S. Hirano, eds), pp. 145–160, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Throckmorton, L.H. 1975. The phylogeny, ecology and geography ofDrosophila. In: Handbook of Genetics (King, R.C., ed.), pp. 421–469, Plenum Publ, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  31. van der Walt, J.P. and D. Yarow. 1984. Methods for isolation, maintenance, classification and identification of yeasts. In: The Yeasts, a Taxonomic Study, 3rd edn (Kreger-van Rij, N.J., ed.), pp. 45–104, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to Professor Herman Jan Phaff in honor of his 50 years of active research which still continues.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lachance, MA., Gilbert, D.G. & Starmer, W.T. Yeast communities associated withDrosophila species and related flies in an eastern oak-pine forest: A comparison with western communities. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 14, 484–494 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01573963

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01573963

Key words

Navigation