Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of carbon/energy and complex nitrogen sources for bacterial sulphate-reduction: potential applications to bioprecipitation of toxic metals as sulphides

  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology

Abstract

Detailed nutrient requirements were determined to maximise efficacy of a sulphate-reducing bacterial mixed culture for biotechnological removal of sulphate, acidity and toxic metals from waste waters. In batch culture, lactate produced the greatest biomass, while ethanol was more effective in stimulating sulphide production and acetate was less effective. The presence of additional bicarbonate and H2 only marginally stimulated sulphide production. The sulphide output per unit of biomass was greatest using ethanol as substrate. In continuous culture, ethanol and lactate were used directly as efficient substrates for sulphate reduction while acetate yielded only slow growth. Glucose was utilised following fermentation to organic acids and therefore had a deleterious effect on pH. Ethanol was selected as the most efficient substrate due to cost and efficient yield of sulphide. On ethanol, the presence of additional carbon sources had no effect on growth or sulphate reduction in batch culture but the presence of complex nitrogen sources (yeast extract or cornsteep) stimulated both. Cornsteep showed the strongest effect and was also preferred on cost grounds. In continuous culture, cornsteep significantly improved the yield of sulphate reduced per unit of ethanol consumed. These results suggest that the most efficient nutrient regime for bioremediation using sulphate-reducing bacteria required both ethanol as carbon source and cornsteep as a complex nitrogen source.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrews GF. 1984. Parameter estimation from batch culture data. Biotechnol Bioeng 26: 824–825.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes LJ, FJ Janssen, J Sherren, JH Versteegh, RO Koch and PJH Scheeren. 1991. A new process for the microbial removal of sulphate and heavy metals from contaminated waters extracted by a geohydrological control system. Trans IChemE 69: 184–186.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein using the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Chem 72: 248–254.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brierley CL. 1990. Bioremediation of metal contaminated surface and ground waters. Geomicrobiol J 8: 201–223.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Catallo WJ and RJ Portier. 1992. Use of indigenous and adapted microbial assemblages in the removal of organic chemicals from soils and sediments. Wat Sci Technol 25: 229–237.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang JC. 1993. Solubility product constants. In: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (Lide DR ed), pp 8–39, CRC Press, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cowling SJ, MJ Gardner and DTE Hunt. 1992. Removal of heavy metals from sewage by sulphide precipitation: thermodynamic calculations and tests on a pilot-scale anaerobic reactor. Environ Technol 13: 281–291.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crathorne B and AJ Dobbs. 1990. Chemical pollution of the aquatic environment by priority pollutants and its control. In: Pollution: Causes, Effects and Control (Harrison RM, ed), pp 1–18, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davison AD, H Csellner P Karuso and DA Veal. 1994. Synergistic growth of 2 members from a mixed microbial consortium growing on biphenyl. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 14: 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Du Preez LA, JP Odendaal, JP Maree and M Ponsonby. 1992. Biological removal of sulphate from industrial effluents using producer gas as energy source. Environ Technol 13: 875–882.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dvorak DH, RS Hedin, HM Edenborn and PE McIntire. 1992. Treatment of metal-contaminated water using bacterial sulfate reduction: results from pilot-scale reactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 40: 609–616.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gadd GM and C White. 1993. Microbial treatment of metal pollution—a working biotechnology? Trends Biotechnol 11: 353–359.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gale NL. 1986. The role of algae and other microorganisms in metal detoxification and environmental clean-up. In: Biotechnology for the Mining, Metal-refining and Fossil Fuel Processing Industries (Ehrlich HL and DS Holmes, eds), pp 171–180, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hammack RW and HM Edenborn. 1992. The removal of nickel from mine waters using bacterial sulphate-reduction. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 37: 674–678.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hansen TA. 1993. Carbon metabolism in sulfate-reducing bacteria. In: The Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: Contemporary Perspectives (Odom JM and R Singleton, eds), pp 21–40, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hedin RS and RW Nairn. 1993. Contaminant removal capabilities of wetlands constructed to treat coal mine drainage. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Constructed Wetlands for Water-Quality Improvement (Moshini GA, ed), pp 187–195, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Labib F, JF Ferguson, MM Benjamin, M Merigh and NL Ricker. 1993. Mathematical modelling of an anaerobic butyrate degrading consortium—predicting their responses to organic overloads. Envivon Sci Technol 27: 2673–2684.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Macaskie LE and ACR Dean. 1989. Microbial metabolism, desolubilization, and deposition of heavy metals: uptake by immobilised cells and application to the treatment of liquid wastes. In: Biological Waste Treatment (Mizrahi A, ed), pp 159–201, Alan R Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Madsen T and J Aamand. 1992. Anaerobic transformation and toxicity of trichlorophenols in a stable enrichment culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 58: 557–561.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maree JP, A Gerber and E Hill. 1987. An integrated process for biological treatment of sulphate-containing industrial effluents. J WPCF 59: 1069–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Odesto P, P Amerlynck, EJ Nyns and HP Naveau. 1992. Acclimatization of a methanogenic consortium to polychlorinated compounds in a fixed-film stationary bed bioreactor. Wat Sci Technol 25: 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peck HD. 1993. Bioenergetic strategies of the sulfate-reducing bacteria. In: The Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: Contemporary Perspectives (Odom JM and R Singleton, eds), pp 41–75, Springer Verlag New York.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Postgate JR. 1984. The Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Scheeren PJH, RO Koch, CJN Buisman, LJ Barnes and JH Versteegh. 1991. New biological treatment plant for heavy metal contaminated groundwater. In: Proceedings of EMC91. Non Ferrous Metallurgy Present and Future, pp 403–416. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor MRG and RAN McLean. 1992. Overview of clean-up methods for contaminated sites. JIWEM 6: 408–417.

    Google Scholar 

  26. White C, SC Wilkinson and GM Gadd. 1995. The role of microorganisms in biosorption of toxic metals and radionuclides. Int Biodet Biodeg 35: 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  27. White C and GM Gadd. 1996. Mixed sulphate-reducing bacterial cultures for bioprecipitation of toxic metals: effects of sulphate and substrate concentrations and dilution rate. Microbiology 142: 2197–2205.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Widdel F. 1988. Microbiology and ecology of sulfate- and sulfur-reducing bacteria. In: Biology of Anaerobic Microorganisms (Widdel F, ed), pp 469–585, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, C., Gadd, G.M. A comparison of carbon/energy and complex nitrogen sources for bacterial sulphate-reduction: potential applications to bioprecipitation of toxic metals as sulphides. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 17, 116–123 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570054

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570054

Keywords

Navigation