Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Binding selectivity ofStreptococcus pyogenes and M-protein to epithelial cells differs from that of lipoteichoic acid

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of M-protein-positive (M+) and M-protein-negative (M−) strains (including an M− mutant lacking the structural gene for M-protein) ofStreptococcus pyogenes to attach to human pharyngeal, buccal, and tongue epithelial cells was compared. We observed that M+ strains ofS. pyogenes attached in significantly higher numbers to human pharyngeal epithelial cells than to human buccal or tongue cells. M− strains did not exhibit high-level binding to any type of epithelial cell. Also, the adhesion of an M+ and an M− strain ofS. pyogenes was low to all types of rat epithelial cells tested. The apparent differences in the surface components between human pharyngeal and buccal epithelial cells were confirmed by studies utilizing radiolabeled lectins.Ulex europaeus lectin with a specificity for fucosyl residues, andTriticum vulgaris lectin with a specificity for N-acetyl glucosamine and N-acetyl neuraminic acid residues, bound in higher amounts to human pharyngeal cells than to buccal cells. Pretreatment of pharyngeal epithelial cells with microgram quantities of highly purified type 6 M-protein or miligram quantities of lipoteichoic acid (LTA) derived fromS. pyogenes decreased the subsequent attachment of the organism. However, the binding specificities of3H-LTA were different from those of intact streptococci;3H-LTA bound comparably to human pharyngeal, buccal, and tongue epithelial cells, and it bound in higher quantities to rat epithelial cells. Also, although the adsorption ofS. pyogenes cells to pharyngeal cells was inhibited by the presence of fucose and galactose, these sugars had little effect on the binding of3H-LTA to epithelial cells. In contrast, the high adhesion of M+ strains but not M− mutants to pharyngeal cells suggested that M-protein may play an important role. This possibility was supported by the observation that3H-labeled purified type 6 M-protein bound in higher concentrations to human pharyngeal epithelial cells than to human buccal cells. Furthermore, human pharyngeal epithelial cells were estimated to contain larger numbers of binding sites for M-protein than buccal cells, whereas the affinity of M-protein was similar to both cell types. These adsorption parameters are similar to those previously established for intact streptococcal cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Alkan M, Ofek I, Beachey EH (1977) Adherence of pharyngeal and skin strains of group A streptococci to human skin and oral epithelial cells. Infect Immun 18:555–557

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beachey EH (1981) Bacterial adherence: adhesin-receptor interactions mediating the attachment of bacteria to mucosal surfaces. J Infect Dis 143:325–345

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beachey EH, Ofek I (1976) Epithelial cell binding of group A streptococci by lipoteichoic acid on fimbriae denuded of M-protein. J Exp Med 143:759–771

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beachey EH, Simpson WA (1982) The adherence of group A streptococci to oropharyngeal cells: the lipoteichoic acid adhesin and fibronectin receptor. Infection 10:107–111

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beachey EH, Chiang TM, Ofek I, Kang A (1977) Interaction of lipoteichoic acid of group A streptococci with human platelets. Infect Immun 16:649–654

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Google Scholar 

  7. Childs WC, Gibbons RJ (1986) Use of Percoll gradients for assays of bacterial attachment to epithelial cells. J Dent Res (Spec Issue) 65:736, Abst 99

    Google Scholar 

  8. Courtney H, Ofek I, Simpson WA, Beachey EH (1981) Characterization of lipoteichoic acid binding to polymorphonuclear leukocytes of human blood. Infection 32:625–631

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ellen RP, Gibbons RJ (1972) “M” protein-associated adherence ofStreptococcus pyogenes to epithelial surfaces: prerequisite for virulence. Infect Immun 5:826–830

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ellen RP, Gibbons RJ (1974) Parameters affecting the adherence and tissue tropisms ofS. pyogenes. Infect Immun 1:85–91

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fischetti VA, Jones KF, Manjula BN, Scott JR (1984) Streptococcal M6 protein expressed inEscherichia coli. Localization, purification, and comparison with streptococcal-derived M-protein. J Exp Med 159:1083–1985

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibbons RJ, Moreno EC, Etherden I (1983) Concentrationdependent multiple binding sites on saliva-treated hydroxyapatite forStreptococcus sanguis C5. Infect Immun 39:280–289

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gravoskaya KB, Totolian AA, Ryc M, Havlicek J, Burova LA, Biocova R (1980) Adherence of group A streptococci to epithelial cells in tissue cultures. Zentral Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg [A] 247:303–314

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jentoft N, Dearborn DG (1980) Protein labeling by reductive methylation with sodium cyanoborohydride: effect of cyanide and metal ions on the reaction. Anal Biochem 106:186–190

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jones GW (1984) Adhesion to animal surfaces. In: Marshall KC (ed) Microbial adhesion and aggregation. Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, pp 71–84

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jones GW, Isacsson RE (1983) Proteinaceous bacterial adhesins and their receptors. Crit Rev Microbiol 10:229–260

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jones KF, Manjula BN, Johnson KH, Hollingshead SK, Scott JR, Fischetti VA (1985) Location of variable and conserved epitopes among the multiple serotypes of streptococcal M-protein. J Exp Med 161:623–628

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kessler RE, Shockman GD (1979) Precursor-product relationship of intracellular and extracellular lipoteichoic acids ofStreptococcus faecium. J Bacteriol 137:869–877

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ofek I, Beachey EH, Jefferson W, Campbell GL (1975) Cell membrane-binding properties of group A streptococcal lipoteichoic acid. J Exp Med 141:990–1003

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ofek I, Courtney HS, Schifferli DM, Beachey EH (1986) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for adherence of bacteria to animal cells. J Clin Microbiol 24:512–516

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peros WJ, Gibbons RJ (1986) Evidence suggesting multiple binding sites in experimental pellicles forStreptococcus mutans JBP. J Dent Res 65:1332–1334

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rutter RP (1984) Mechanisms of adhesion. In: Marshall KC (ed) Microbial adhesion and aggregation. Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, pp 5–20

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scott JR, Fischetti V (1983) Expression of streptococcal M-protein inEscherichia coli. Science 221:758–760

    Google Scholar 

  24. Scott JR, Pulliam WM, Hollingshead SK, Fischetti VA (1985) Relationship of M-protein genes in group A streptococci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:1822–1826

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simpson WA, Beachey EH (1983) Adherence of group A streptococci to fibronectin on oral epithelial cells. Infect Immun 39:275–279

    Google Scholar 

  26. Simpson WA, Ofek I, Beachey EH (1980) Fatty acid binding sites of serum albumin as membrane receptor analogs for streptococcal lipoteichoic acid. Infect Immun 29:119–122

    Google Scholar 

  27. Simpson WA, Ofek I, Sarasohn CH, Morrison J, Beachey EH (1980) Characteristics of the binding of streptococcal liptoteichoic acid to human oral epithelial cells. J Infect Dis 141:457–462

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tylewska SK, Gibbons RJ (1987) Application of Percoll density gradients in studies of the adhesion ofStreptococcus pyogenes to human epithelial cells. Curr Microbiol, in press

  29. Wadstrom T, Tylewska S (1982) Glyconjugates as possible receptors forStreptococcus pyogenes. Curr Microbiol 7:343–346

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Hygiene, Warsaw, Poland

    Stanislawa K. Tylewska

  2. Rockefeller University, New York, New York

    Vincent A. Fischetti

  3. Forsyth Dental Center, 140 Fenway, 02115, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Ronald J. Gibbons

Authors
  1. Stanislawa K. Tylewska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vincent A. Fischetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ronald J. Gibbons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tylewska, S.K., Fischetti, V.A. & Gibbons, R.J. Binding selectivity ofStreptococcus pyogenes and M-protein to epithelial cells differs from that of lipoteichoic acid. Current Microbiology 16, 209–216 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01568531

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01568531

Keywords

Search

Navigation