Abstract
Considering the proton either as a three-quark state with its wave function fulfilling QCD sum rules or as a quark-diquark state with wave function parametrizations that are shown to fitG M P, we study the possibility of discriminating between these two competing pictures by comparing their respective predictions for\(J/\Psi \to p\bar p\gamma \) and\(\Upsilon (1S) \to p\bar p\gamma \) decays. ForJ/Ψ decay, thep \(\bar p\) invariantmass distributions derived from either model are found to be of about the same magnitude, but neither of them is able by itself to reproduce present-day data. Differences between the two pictures may eventually show up in the case of Υ(1S) decay, but the predicted counting rates are small. We also consider some other possible production mechanisms for\(p\bar p\gamma \) final states.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V.L. Chernyak, I.R. Zhitnitsky: Nucl. Phys. B 246 (1984) 52
V.L. Chernyak, A.R. Zhitnitsky: Phys. Rep. 112 (1984) 173
I.D. King, C.T. Sachrajda: Nucl Phys. B 279 (1987) 785
V.L. Chernyak, A.A. Oglobin, I.B. Zhitnitsky: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 42 (1989) 569
G.R. Farrar, H. Zhang, A.A. Oglobin, I.R. Zhitnitsky: Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1988/89) 585
V.L. Chernyak, A.A. Oglobin, I.R. Zhitnitsky: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 42 (1989) 583
S.J. Brodsky, G.R. Farrar: Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, (1973) 1153; Phys. Rev. D11 (1975) 1309. V.A. Mateev, R.M. Muradyan, A.V. Tavkhelidze: Lett. Nuovo Cimento 7 (1973) 719
G.P. Lepage, S.J. Brodsky: Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2157; Phys. Lett. 87B (1979) 359; Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 545, 1625(E)
S.J. Brodsky, G.P. Lepage: in: Perturbative quantum chromodynamics, p. 93. A.H. Mueller (ed.) Singapore: World Scientific 1989
G.R. Farrar, E. Maina, F. Neri: Nucl. Phys. B 259 (1985) 702; ibid. G.R. Farrar, E. Maina, F. Neri: Nucl. Phys. B263 (1986) 746(E)
E. Maina, G.R. Farrar: Phys. Lett. 206B (1988) 120
S.J. Brodsky, G.P. Lepage: Phys. Rev. D 24 (1981) 2848
J.R.O. O'Fallon et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 733; D.G. Crabb et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 (1978) 1257; E.A. Crosbie et al.: Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 600; I.P. Auer et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 808; P.R. Cameron et al.: Phys. Rev. D32 (1985) 3070; S. Heppelmann et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 1824; G.R. Court et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 507
M. Anselmino, P. Kroll, B. Pire: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 36 (1987) 89
M. Anselmino, F. Caruso, S. Forte, B. Pire: Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 3516
M. Anselmino, F. Caruso, P. Kroll, W. Schweiger: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 4 (1989) 5213
I.S.I. Anselmino, M. Anselmino, E. Predazzi: (eds.) Workshop on diquarks Singapore: World Scientific 1989
P. Kroll, W. Schweiger: [17]Workshop on diquarks Singapore: World Scientific 1989 p. 13
M. Szczekowski: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 4 (1989) 3985
S.J. Brodsky, G.F. de Teramond: Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1924
C. Carimalo: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2 (1987) 249
H.G. Dosch, M. Jamin, B. Stech: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 42 (1989) 167; M. Jamin, M. Neubert: Phys. Lett. B238 (1990) 387
R.J. Abrams et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 (1967) 1209; J. Alspector et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 511; M. Coupland et al.: Phys. Lett. B71 (1977) 460
A. Dekmouche: Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Clermont-Ferrand II, June 1987 (unpublished)
L. Kopke, N. Wermes: Phys. Rep.: 174 (1989)
H. Albrecht et al.: (ARGUS Coll.): Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 42 (1989) 349
Here we are using the “helicity coupling” recipe of M. Jacob, G.C. Wick: Ann. Phys. 7 (1959) 404; see also formula (2–14) of [21]
For a detailed description of the subprocesses giving rise toG M in the diquark model, see for instance [29, 30]
P. Kroll, M. Schürmann, W. Schweiger: Preprint WUB 90-15, Wuppertal (1990)
P. Kroll, M. Schürmann, W. Schweiger: Preprint WUB 90-16, Wuppertal (1990)
T. Huang: Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.)B 7 (1989) 320
R.G. Arnold et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 174
M. Anselmino, F. Caruso, F. Murgia: Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 3218
R. Sinha, S. Okubo: Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 2333
J.E. Augustin et al.: (DM2 Coll.): Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 36 (1987) 369
G. Bassompierre et al.: Phys. Lett. 64B (1976) 475; Phys. Lett. 68B (1977) 477; B. Delcourt et al.: Phys. Lett. 86B (1979) 395. D. Biselo et al.: Nucl. Phys. B224 (1983) 379
J.G. Körner, M. Kuroda: Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 2165
See for instance: K. Königsmann: Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 535 (1987) 98; DESY/87-151 (Nov. 1987)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carimalo, C., Ong, S. Study of the\(J/\Psi \to p\bar p\gamma \) and\(\Upsilon /(1S) \to p\bar p\gamma \) decays as possible tests of the proton wave function. Z. Phys. C - Particles and Fields 52, 487–498 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01559445
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01559445