Abstract
Pollen tubes were grown under controlled temperatures in stigmas and styles which had been cut from the flowers at the point of juncture of the style with the ovary. At constant temperatures the tubes compatible with the styles grew rapidly at uniform rates. They showed accelerated growth with increase in temperature within the range 10°–30°C. Growth of incompatible tubes was irregular and slow and was neither measurably accelerated nor depressed within this range of temperatures. Routine tests for compatibility were conducted at 27°C; at this temperature compatible tubes grew through the entire length of the styles (ca. 58 mm) in 9 hours. Much of the incompatible pollen failed to germinate; that which did, grew to a maximum length ofca. 2 mm inca. 4 hours. The incompatible tubes did not even enter the styles but remained confined to the stigmas. ThreeS alleles were involved and conformed in their behavior to the gametophytic system of incompatibility. Colchicine-induced tetraploid derivatives of these plants showed no increase in compatibility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atwood, S. S. (1944). The behavior of oppositional alleles in polyploids ofTrifolium repens.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 30: 69–79.
Atwood, S. S. &J. L. Brewbaker (1950). Multiple oppositional alleles in autoploid white clover.Records Gen. Soc. Amer. 19: 87.
Crane, M. B. &D. Lewis (1942). Genetical studies in pears. III. Incompatibility and sterility.J. Genet. 43: 31–43.
East, E. M. &A. J. Mangelsdorf (1925). A new interpretation of the heredity behavior of self-sterile plants.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 11: 166–183.
Emerson, S. (1938). The genetics of self-incompatibility inOenothera organensis.Genetics 23: 190–202.
Gairdner, A. E. (1926).Campanula persicifolia and its tetraploid form, “Telham Beauty”.J. Genet. 16: 341–351.
Hecht, A. (1942). Colchicine induced tetraploidy inOenothera.Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 51: 87–93.
Hecht, A. (1944). Induced tetraploids of a self-sterileOenothera.Genetics 29: 69–74.
Hecht, A. (1960). Growth of pollen tubes ofOenothera organensis through otherwise incompatible styles.Amer. J. Bot. 47: 32–36.
Lewis, D. (1942). The physiology of incompatibility. I. The effect of temperature.Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) B131: 13–26.
Lewis, D. (1943). Physiology of incompatibility in plants. III. Autopolyploids.J. Genet. 45: 171–185.
Lewis, D. (1947). Competition and dominance of incompatibility alleles in diploid pollen.Heredity 1: 85–108.
Lewis, D. (1954). Comparative incompatibility in angiosperms and fungi.Adv. Genet. 6: 235–285.
Modilibowska, I. (1945). Pollen tube growth and embryo-sac development in apples and pears.J. Pomol. Hort. Sci. 21: 57–89.
Pandey, K. K. (1956). Incompatibility in autotetraploidTrifolium pratense.Genetics 41: 353–366.
Pandey, K. K. (1960). Evolution of gametophytic and sporophytic systems of self-incompatibility in angiosperms.Evolution 14: 98–115.
Stout, A. B. &C. Chandler (1941). Change from self-incompatibility to self-compatibility accompanying change from diploid to tetraploid.Science 94: 118.
Straub, J. (1941). Die Beseitigung der Selbststerilität durch Polyploidisierung.Ber. deutsch. bot. Ges. 59: 298.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bali, P.N., Hecht, A. The genetics of self-incompatibility inOenothera rhombipetala . Genetica 36, 159–171 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01557151
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01557151