Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex roles and soap operas: What adolescents learn about single motherhood

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the contribution of daytime television soap operas to the perception of the roles and lifestyle of the single mother. The perceptions of soap opera viewers and nonviewers were compared using 163 junior and senior high students as subjects, 9% of whom were ethnic minorities. In particular, viewers perceive that single mothers have good jobs, are relatively well-educated and do not live in poverty. Further, they perceive that their babies will be as healthy as most babies and that their babies will get love and attention from adult men who are friends of their mothers. To the degree that these perceptions contribute to the gender role socialization of adolescents, we are faced with a problematic situation. Particularly in light of the fact that soap operas are increasingly targeting the adolescent viewer, the image portrayed on soap operas and the impact it appears to have is of great concern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berryman-Fink, C., Ballard-Reisch, D., & Newman, L. (1993).Communication and sex-role socialization. NY: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buerkel-Rothfuss, N., Greenberg, B., Atkin, C., & Neuendorf, K. (1982). Learning about the family from television.Journal of Communication, 32(3), 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buerkel-Rothfuss, N., & Mayes, S. (1981). Soap opera viewing: The cultivation effect.Journal of Communication, 31(3), 108–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buerkel-Rothfuss, N., & Strouse, J. (1989, November).Late adolescents' media exposure and perceptions of sexual behaviors: The cultivation hypothesis moves to the bedroom. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Francisco CA.

  • Dash, L. (1990, July–August). When children want children.Society, pp. 17–19.

  • Davis, D. (1990). Portrayals of women in prime-time network television: Some demographic characteristics.Sex Roles, 23(5–6), 325–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominick, J. (1979). The portrayal of women in prime time, 1953–1977.Sex Roles, 5(4), 405–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dylan, J. C. (1993, Feb. 2). Substance abuse in the afternoon: Does daytime tell it like it is?Soap Opera Magazine, p. 37.

  • Freuh, T., & McGhee, P. E. (1975). Traditional sex role development and amount of time spent watching television.Developmental Psychology, 11(1), 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Bitar, N. (1993). The stereotyped portrayal of men and women in British television advertisements.Sex Roles, 29(3–4), 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., & Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (eds.),Media effects: Advances in theory and research. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haignere, C. S. (1987, March).Planned Parenthood Harris poll findings: Teens' sexuality, knowledge and beliefs. Paper presented at the annual Children's Defense Fund National Conference, Washington DC.

  • Hopfensperger, J. (1993, July 6). Young moms say babies give them someone to love.Minneapolis Star Tribune, sec. A: pp. 1, 5.

  • Jennings, J., Geis, F. L., & Brown, V. (1980). Influence of television commercials on women's self-confidence and independent judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantrowitz, B. (1990, June). High school homeroom.Newsweek, pp. 50–54.

  • Kotulak, R. (1986, Dec. 14). Youngsters lose way in maze of family instability.Chicago Tribune, sec. 6: pp. 1, 4, 5.

  • Larson, S. G. (1991). Television's mixed messages: Sexual content onAll My Children.Communication Quarterly, 39(2), 156–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, D., Love, G., & Kirby, M. (1981). Sex on the soap operas: Patterns of intimacy.Journal of Communication, 31(3), 90–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, D., & Towles, D. (1989). Soap opera portrayals of sex, contraception and sexually transmitted diseases.Journal of Communication, 39(2), 76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marek, E. (1989, April). The lives of teenage mothers: Schoolbooks, boyfriends and babies.Harper's Magazine, pp. 56–62.

  • Mazzella, K., Durkin, K., Cerini, E., & Buralli, P. (1992). Sex role stereotyping in Australian television advertisements.Sex Roles, 26(7–8), 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, D. (1991, Dec. 13). Teen-age births in U.S. hit highest level in 15 years.Los Angeles Times, sec. 8: p. A21.

  • Milstead, J. (1988, Nov. 1). Hollywood happenings.Soap Opera Digest, p. 75.

  • Myers, W. (1990, July/August). Babies having babies.Women in Business, pp. 18–20.

  • National Commission on Working Women. (1991–92, Fall/Winter).Women, work and family: Working mothers—overview. Washington DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, K. (1993). Socialization of teenage girls through teen-magazine fiction: The making of a new woman or an old lady?Sex Roles, 29(1–2), 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risky business: One day's look at the pleasure and pressure of sex at an early age. (1990, Nov. 5).People Weekly, pp. 52–60.

  • Roberts, E. J. (1982). Television and sexual learning in childhood. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet, & J. Lazar (Eds.),Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties, Vol. II, (pp. 209–23).

  • Scattergood, S. (1990, January). Curbing teenage pregnancy: A novel approach.USA Today, pp. 87–88.

  • Signorielli, N. (1989). Television and conceptions about sex roles: Maintaining conventionality and the status quo.Sex Roles, 21(5–6), 341–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorielli, N. (1991). Adolescents and ambivalence toward marriage: A cultivation analysis.Youth Society, 23(1), 121–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorielli, N., & Lears, M. (Nov., 1991).Children, television and conceptions chores: Attitudes and behaviors. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.

  • Strouse, J., & Fabes, R. (1985). Formal versus informal sources of sex education: Competing forces in sexual socialization of adolescents.Adolescence, 20(78), 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattleton, F. (1989, July 24/31). Teenage pregnancy: The case for national action.The Nation, pp. 138–141.

  • Whitehead, B. (1993, April). Dan Quayle was right.The Atlantic Monthly, pp. 47–50, 52, 55, 58, 60–62, 64–66, 70–72, 74, 77, 80, 82.

  • Williams, C. (1992).It's time for my story: Soap opera sources, structure and response. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. (1993).Gendered lives: Communication, gender and culture. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication, Northern Illinois University, 60115, DeKalb, Illinois, USA

    Mary Strom Larson

Authors
  1. Mary Strom Larson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larson, M.S. Sex roles and soap operas: What adolescents learn about single motherhood. Sex Roles 35, 97–110 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01548177

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01548177

Keywords

Search

Navigation