Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conflicting testimony: Judges' and attorneys' perceptions of gender bias in legal settings

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Statewide samples of women judges (N = 40), men judges (N = 326), women attorneys (N = 414), men attorneys (N = 288) in Florida rated the extent to which judges and attorneys of both genders engage in different forms of biased behavior against women in legal settings. Women judges and attorneys are most aware of gender-biased behavior against women. Women judges differ, especially, from men judges in perceiving other judges as behaving unprofessionally toward women. Multiple regression results show that this “gender gap” in perceptions is partly a function of age. This study suggests that promotion of more women to judgeships and educational efforts aimed at the younger generation of men judges will be productive in reducing biased treatment of women in the legal system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Bar Association Commission on Women in the Profession. (1996).Elusive Equality: The Experience of Women in Legal Education. Chicago: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eich, W. (1986). Gender bias in the courtroom: Some participants are more equal than others.Judicature, 69 339–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Supreme Court Task Force. (1990).Report of the Florida Supreme Court Gender Bias Study Commission. Tallahassee: Supreme Court of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCorquodale, P., and Jensen, G. 1993. Women in the law: Partners or tokens?Gender and Society, 7 582–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, P. L. (1987, June 9) In re: Gender Bias Study Commission. Florida Supreme Court Administrative Order.

  • MacKinnon, C. A. (1989).Towards a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y., & Powell, M., (1994). Accounting for the ‘second assault’: Legal organizations' framing of rape victims.Law and Social Inquiry, 19 853–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Jersey Supreme Court Task Force. (1986). The first year report of the New Jersey Supreme Court Task Force on Women in the Courts—June 1984.Women's Rights Law Reporter 9 129–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Task Force. (1986–87). Report of the New York Task Force on Women in the Courts.Fordham Urban Law Journal, 15 1–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1988).The sexual contract. Stanford. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L. (1995).Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, J. (1996). Gender in courts.Signs: The Journal of Women in Culture and Society, forthcoming.

  • Rosenberg, J., Pearlstat, H., & Phillips, W. R. F., (1993). Now that we are here: Discrimination disparagement, and harassment at work and the experience of women lawyers.Gender and Society 7 415–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapolsky, B. (1988a).Report on the Florida Bar Survey of Attorneys, Unpublished report. Tallahassee, FL: Sapolsky Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapolsky, B. (1988b).Report on the Supreme Court Gender Bias Study Commission Survey of Florida Judges Unpublished report. Tallahassee, FL: Sapolsky Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafran, L. H. (1985). Educating the judiciary about gender bias: The National Judicial Education Program to Promote Equality for Men and Women in the Courts and the New Jersey Supreme Court Task Force on Women in the Courts.Women's Rights Law Reporter, 9 109–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafran, L. H. (1987a). Practicing law in a sexist society. In Women, The Courts and Equality. L. Crites & W. Hepperle (Eds.), Beverly Hills, CA. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafran, L. H. (1987b). Documenting gender bias in the courts: The task force approach.Judicature, 70 280–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Special Subcommittee on Gender. (1994, May).Preliminary Report to the Task Force of the D.C. Circuit on Gender, Race and Ethnic Bias.

  • Wikler, N. J. (1987). Educating judges about gender bias in the courts. In L. Crites & W. Hepperle (Eds.),Women, The Courts and Equality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Florida State University, 32306-2011, Tallahassee, FL, USA

    Andrea Stepnick & James D. Orcutt

Authors
  1. Andrea Stepnick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James D. Orcutt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

We are especially grateful to Barry Sapolsky for providing us with data from the Florida Gender Bias Study Commission surveys of judges and attorneys. We also wish to thank Patricia Martin and Irene Padavic for their thoughtful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stepnick, A., Orcutt, J.D. Conflicting testimony: Judges' and attorneys' perceptions of gender bias in legal settings. Sex Roles 34, 567–579 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01545033

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01545033

Keywords

Search

Navigation