Abstract
The purpose of the present study is to describe the responses of African American women firefighters to sexual and gender harassment. Surveys and interviews of 22 firefighters nationwide uncovered universal exposure to harassment. Contrary to prior studies, most of which involved white college students and white collar workers, all these firefighters used externally focused, direct response strategies. Nineteen women directly confronted the harasser; of these, ten responded aggressively, including four women who countered physical harassment in kind. Their stories suggested that most found their strategy to be effective at stopping the present harassment and deterring future occurrences. While few firefighters reported positive work relations, these may have been a precursor to, rather than a result of, their direct response patterns.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Statistical Index. (1992). Bethesda, MD: Congressional Information Services.
Armstrong, D. S., Berkman, B., Floren, T. M., & Willing, L. F. (1993).The changing face of the Fire Service: A handbook on women in firefighting. Washington, DC: United States Fire Administration.
Azibo, D. (1988). Understanding the proper and improper usage of the comparative research framework.Journal of Black Psychology, 15 81–91.
Bingham, S. G., & Burleson, B. R. (1989). Multiple effects of messages with multiple goals: Some perceived outcomes of responses to sexual harassment.Human Communication Research, 16 184–216.
Bingham, S. G., & Scherer, L. L. (1993). Factors associated with responses to sexual harassment and satisfaction with outcome.Sex Roles 29 239–269.
Brooks, L., & Perot, A. (1991). Reporting sexual harassment: Exploring a predictive model.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15 31–47.
Cannon, L. W., Higginbotham, E., & Leung, M. L. A. (1988). Race and class bias in qualitative research on women.Gender & Society, 2 449–462.
Essed, P. (1991).Understanding everyday racism: An interdisciplinary theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fitzgerald, L. F., & Ormerod, A. J. (1993). Breaking the silence: The sexual harassment of women in academia and the workplace. In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi,Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Fitzgerald, L. F., Gold, Y., & Brock, K. F. (1990). Responses to victimization: Validation of an objective policy.Journal of College Student Personnel, 27 34–39.
Gruber, J. E. (1989). How women handle sexual harassment: A literature review.Social Science Research, 74 3–7.
Gruber, J. E. (1992). A typology of personal and environmental sexual harassment: Research and policy implications for the 1990s.Sex Roles, 26 447–464.
Gruber, J. E., & Bjorn, L. (1986). Women's responses to sexual harassment: An analysis of sociocultural, organizational, and personal resource models.Social Science Quarterly, 67 814–826.
Hanisch, K. A. (1992). The Job Descriptive Index revisited: Questions about the question mark.Journal of Applied Psychology, 77 377–382.
Hurtado, A. (1989). Relating to privilege: Seduction and rejection in the subordination of white women and women of color.Signs, 14 833–855.
Jennings, A. C., & Metha, A. (1981).Sexual harassment: An in-depth approach. Unpublished manuscript. Arizona State University College of Education, Tempe.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984).Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
Malovich, N. J., & Stake, J. E. (1990). Sexual harassment on campus: Individual differences in attitude and beliefs.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14 63–81.
Martin, S. E. (1994). “Outsider within” the station house: The impact of race and gender on Black women police.Social Problems, 41 383–400.
Maypole, D. E. (1986). Sexual harassment of social workers at work: Injustice within.Social Work 31 29–34.
McCarl, R. (1985).The District of Columbia Fire Fighters' Project: A case study of occupational folklife. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Ormerod, A. J. (1989, August).Women's students' self-efficacy expectations about coping with sexual harassment. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.
Ormerod, A. J., & Gold, Y. (1988, March).Coping with sexual harassment: Internal and external strategies for coping with stress. Paper presented at the meetings of the Association for Women in Psychology, Bethesda, MD.
Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, measurement, and validation.Academy of Management Journal, 32 622–648.
Rabinowitz, V. C., & Sechzer, J. A. (1993). Feminist perspectives on research methods. In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (eds.),Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Reilly, M. E., Lott, B., & Gallogly, S. M. (1986). Sexual harassment of university students.Sex Roles, 15 333–358.
Rosenberg, J., Perlstadt, H., & Phillips, W. R. F. (1993). Now that we are here: Discrimination, disparagement, and harassment at work and the experience of women lawyers.Gender & Society, 7 415–433.
Schaffer, L. F., & Shoben, E. J., Jr. (1956).The psychology of adjustment. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969).The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1978).Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Stokes, J., Riger, S., Nelson, J., Beety, K., Pinsof, D., & Sullivan, M. (1993, April).The chilly working climate for women. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Community Research and Action, Chicago.
Tangri, S. S., Burt, M. R., & Johnson, L. B. (1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models.Journal of Social Issues, 38 33–54.
Till, F. J. (1980).Sexual harassment: A report on the sexual harassment of students. Washington, DC: National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981).Sexual harassment of federal workers: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1987).Sexual harassment of federal workers: An update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference.Gender & Society, 9 8–37.
Yoder, J. D. (1994). Looking beyond numbers: The effects of gender status, job prestige, and occupational gender-typing on tokenism outcomes.Social Psychology Quarterly, 57 150–159.
Yoder, J. D., & Aniakudo, P. (1994, August).African-American women firefighters in triple jeopardy. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
Yoder, J. D., & Kahn, A.S. (1993). Working toward an inclusive psychology of women.American Psychologist, 48 846–850.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We wish to thank Maureen Aniakudo, Brenda Brooks, and the International Association of Black Professional Firefighters, and Terese Floren and Women in the Fire Service for their invaluable advice and support. This project was supported by funding from the Fromkin Research Grant and Lectureship at the University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues' Grants-in-Aid Program, and the University of Wisconsin System's Institute on Race and Ethnicity.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoder, J.D., Aniakudo, P. The responses of African American women firefighters to gender harassment at work. Sex Roles 32, 125–137 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544784
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544784