Abstract
This study considers how high school students perceive incidents of possible sexual harassment toward students and how they define sexual harassment. Thirty-five male and 38 female high school seniors (44% Asian-American; 40% white, non-Hispanic; 6% Indian-American; 4% African-American; 3% Hispanic; and 3% other ethnic groups) evaluated scenarios that varied the type of sexual harassment, the status of the initiator (either teacher or student), and the gender composition of the dyad (either male toward female or female toward male). As predicted, type of harassment influenced ratings of severity. Compared to male respondents, female respondents rated the scenarios as more severe. Teachers were judged more critically than students. Differences in status were more apparent at less severe levels of harassment. In defining harassment, students relied on four factors: the behavior itself, the target's reaction to the behavior, the perpetrator's intentions, and the relationship that existed between the two people. Overall, the findings underline the importance of examining high schools as a locale for harassment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association of University Women (1993).Hostile hallways: AAUW survey on sexual harassment in American schools. American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
Deaux, K. (1993). Commentary: Sorry wrong number—a reply to Gentile's call.Psychological Science, 4 125–126.
Deaux, K. (1985). Sex and gender.Annual Review of Psychology, 36 49–81.
Fitzgerald, L. F. (1992).Sexual harassment in higher education: Concepts and issues. Washington, DC: National Education Association of the U.S.
Fitzgerald, L. F., & Shullman, S. L. (1993). Sexual harassment: A research analysis and agenda for the 1990s.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42 5–27.
Fitzgerald, L. F., & Weitzman, L. M. (1990). Men who harass: Speculation and data. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.),Ivory power: Sexual harassment on campus. Albany: SUNY Press.
Gutek, B. A. (1985).Sex and the workplace: Impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gutek, B. A., Morasch, B., & Cohen A. G. (1993). Interpreting socio-sexual behavior in a work setting.Vocational Behavior, 22 30–48.
Jones, T. S., & Remland, M. S. (1992). Sources of variability in perceptions of and responses to sexual harassment.Sex Roles, 27 121–142.
Kenig, S., & Ryan, J. (1986). Sex differences in levels of tolerance and attribution of blame for sexual harassment on a university campus.Sex Roles, 15 535–549.
Marks, M. A., & Nelson, E. S. (1993). Sexual harassment on campus: Effects of professor gender on perceptions of sexually harassing behaviors.Sex Roles, 28 207–217.
Tata, J. (1993). The structure and phenomenon of sexual harassment: Impact of category of sexually harassing behavior, gender, and hierarchical level.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23 199–211.
Till, F. J. (1980).Sexual Harassment: A Report on the Sexual Harassment of Students. Washington, DC: National Advisory Council on Women's educational Programs.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (1981).Sexual harassment in the federal workforce: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was originally conducted by the first author as a Westinghouse Science project at Stuyvesant High School, with the guidance of the second and third authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loredo, C., Reid, A. & Deaux, K. Judgments and definitions of sexual harassment by high school students. Sex Roles 32, 29–45 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544756
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544756