Abstract
Experiments were carried out to determine whether the mitochondria-specific dye rhodamine-6G (R6G) can affect transmission of cytoplasmic determinants in mammalian cells. When one parental cell type was treated with R6G prior to fusion with an untreated partner, the subsequent hybridization frequencies in both intra- and interspecific crosses were not adversely affected, even though R6G was extremely toxic to the parental cells. In addition, cells lethally treated with R6G could be rescued by fusion with cytoplasm alone from untreated cells. When chloramphenicol (CAP) resistant cells were used as the R6G-treated parent, the expression of CAP resistance in hybrids and cybrids was greatly reduced. Thus R6G can be used to control the input of cytoplasmic determinants into fused cells. In the interspecific (Chinese hamster × mouse) crosses, it was also seen that the majority of hybrids which had not been R6G pretreated grew poorly or degenerated after a short time. In contrast, nearly all hybrids in crosses where the hamster parent was R6G pretreated grew vigorously. The concomitant elimination of inviability and loss of mitochondrial determinants in R6G-pretreated hybrids suggests that interactions involving mitochondrial gene products or components can influence growth characteristics in interspecific somatic cell hybrids.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Sager, R. (1972).Cytoplasmic Genes and Organelles (Academic Press, New York).
Gillham, N.W. (1978).Organelle Heredity (Raven Press, New York).
Sager, R., and Ramanis, Z. (1967).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 58:931–937.
Sager, R., and Ramanis, Z. (1973).Theor. Appl. Genet. 43:101–108.
Dujon, B., Kruszewska, A., Slonimski, P.P., Bolatin-Fukuhara, M., Coen, D., Deutsch, J., Netter, P., and Weill, L. (1975).Mol. Gen. Genet. 137:29–72.
Gilham, N.W., Boynton, J.E., and Lee, R.E. (1974).Genetics 78:439–457.
Bunn, C.L., Wallace, D.C., and Eisenstadt, J.M. (1974).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71:1681–1685.
Mitchell, C.H., and Attardi, G. (1978).Somat. Cell Genet. 4:737–744.
Yen, R.C.K., and Harris, M. (1978).Cell Struct. Funct. 3:79–88.
Munro, E., Siegel, R.L., Craig, I.W., and Sly, W.S. (1978).Proc. R. Soc. London B 201:73–85.
Lichtor, T., and Getz, G.S. (1978).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75:324–328.
Lichtor, T., Tung, B., and Getz, G.S. (1979).Biochemistry 12:2582–2590.
Harris, M. (1978).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75:5604–5608.
Howell, N., and Sager, R. (1979).Somat. Cell Genet. 5:833–845.
Doersen, C., and Stanbridge, E. (1979).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76:4549–4553.
Wiseman, A., and Attardi, G. (1978).Mol. Gen. Genet. 167:51–63.
Graves, J.A.M. (1980).Exp. Cell Res. 125:483–486.
Strugger, S. (1938).Protoplasma 30:85–100.
Gear, A.R.L. (1974).J. Biol. Chem. 249:3628–3637.
Johnson, L.V., Walsh, M.L., and Chen, L.B. (1980).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77:990–994.
Harris, M. (1974).J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 52:1811–1816.
Ziegler, M.L., and Davidson, R.L. (1979).J. Cell. Physiol. 98:627–636.
Harris, M. (1972).J. Cell. Physiol. 80:119–128.
Matsuya, H., and Green, H. (1969).Science 163:697–698.
Ziegler, M.L. (1978).Somat. Cell Genet. 4:477–489.
Pontecorvo, G. (1971).Nature 230:367–369.
Bunn, C.L., Wallace, D.C., and Eisenstadt, J.M. (1977).Somat. Cell Genet. 3:71–92.
Wallace, D.C., and Eisenstadt, J.M. (1979).Somat. Cell Genet. 5:373–396.
Subik, J., Takascova, G., and Kovac, L. (1978).Mol. Gen. Genet. 166:103–116.
Gunge, N. (1975).Mol. Gen. Genet. 139:189–202.
Graves, J.A.M. (1972).Exp. Cell Res. 73:81–94.
Graves, J.A.M., and Koschel, K.W. (1980).J. Cell. Physiol. 102:209–216.
Ditta, G., Soderberg, K., Landy, F., and Scheffler, I.E. (1976).Somat. Cell Genet. 2:331–344.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ziegler, M.L., Davidson, R.L. Elimination of mitochondrial elements and improved viability in hybrid cells. Somat Cell Mol Genet 7, 73–88 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544749
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544749