Skip to main content
Log in

Masculine traits and reports of social functioning: Evidence for a positivity bias

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous reviews have concluded that there is a significant positive relation between masculine traits and measures of adjustment, including social adjustment. It is suggested that this relation be viewed with caution because it is based on studies that have relied on only one type of personality data—self-reports of one's own behavior, feelings, and personality characteristics. The recent study by Aube et al. (1994) suggests that the inclusion of other kinds of data, such as peer reports or behavioral observation, may yield different results. Two experiments (participants were predominately white) were conducted to examine the relation of self-reported masculine traits to subjective vs. objective indicators of social functioning. Study 1 found that masculine traits were significantly positively associated with self-reported popularity of teenagers, but that these same traits were unrelated to sociometric ratings made by classmates. Study 2 found that masculine traits were significantly associated with reporting better social-expressive skills among college students, but that these traits were unrelated to actual performance on a test of nonverbal encoding skills. Both studies found significant relations between masculine traits and discrepancy scores calculated between the subjective and objective indicators of social functioning. Together, these studies suggest that the relation between masculine traits and better adjustment may be more perceived than real.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aube, J. & Koestner, R. (1992). Gender characteristics and adjustment: A longitudinal study.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 485–493.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aube, J., Norcliffe, H. Craig, J.-A., & Koestner, R. (1994). Gender characteristics and adjustment-related outcomes: Questioning the masculinity model.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, in press.

  • Bassoff, E. S., & Glass, G. V. (1982). The relationship between sex roles and mental health: A meta-analysis of twenty-six studies.The Counselling Psychologist, 10 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 155–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex-role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31 634–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. (1971).Lives through time. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. (1981). Some enduring and consequential structures of personality. In A. I. Rubin, J. Aronoff, A. M. Barclay, & R. A. Zucker (Eds.),Further explorations in personality. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldizar, J. P. (1991). Assessing sextyping and androgyny in children: The Children's sex role inventory.Developmental Psychology, 27 505–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964).The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrovsky, L., Singer, J., & Yinon, Y. (1989). Masculine and feminine traits: Their relation to suitedness for and success in training for traditionally masculine and feminine army functions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 839–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. G., & Dinning, W. D. (1982). MMPI correlates of the Bem Sex Role Inventory and Extended Personal Attributes Questionnaire in a male psychiatric sample.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38 811–815.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. S., Prince, L. M., Riggio, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (1980). Understanding and assessing nonverbal expressiveness: The affective communication test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 333–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T. L., & Schwab, R. (1990). Sex-role orientation and personal adjustment.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5 473–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (1987). Rethinking masculinity: New directions in research. In M. S. Kimmel (Ed.)Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenney, E. (1986). Sex roles: The measurement of masculinity, femininity and androgyny. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.),Measures of personality and social psychology attitudes. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F. (1992). Toward the reconstruction of masculinity.Journal of Family Psychology, 5 378–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markstrom-Adams, C. (1989). Androgyny and its relation to adolescent psychosocial well-being: A review of the literature.Sex Roles, 21 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. G., Licht, B. G., & Pearl, R. A. (1982). Some dangers of using personality questionnaires to study personality.Psychological Bulletin, 92 572–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neil, J. M. (1993). The gender role journey measures: Scale development and psychometric evaluation.Sex Roles, 28 167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.),Measures of personality and social psychology attitudes. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1981).The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1993). Masculinity ideology: It's impact on adolescent males' heterosexual relationships.Journal of Social Issues, 49 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Studying, social interaction with the Rochester interaction record.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24 269–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, P. E., & Cohen, L. H. (1987). Sex roles and social support as moderators of life stress adjustment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 576–585.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research.Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 13 1–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity.JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4 43 (Ms. No. 617).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 29–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods and conclusions.Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health.Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towbes, L., Cohen, L., & Glyshaw, K. (1989). Instrumentality as a life-stress moderator for early versus middle adolescents.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 109–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1983). Sex-role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 773–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1984). Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses.Sex Roles, 12 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1988). Masculinity, femininity, and self-esteem: A multitrait-multimethod analysis.Sex Roles, 18 419–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Gridley, B. E. (1993). Sex-role orientation, self-esteem, and depression: A latent variable analysis.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19 363–369.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We would like to thank Dr. Henry J. Peris, Mrs. Doreen DeCamp, Mrs. Janice Hodgins Spiotta, and the entire staff of the Wheatland-Chili Central School District for their assistance in the data collection for Study I. Ed Deci also provided invaluable assistance for which we are grateful in the coordination of Study 1. We would like to thank Buono Enterprises for the donation of Big Macs, french fries, and soft drinks. We would also like to thank Neil Duncan for his help in conducting Study 2.

We would like to thank John Lydon, Morton Mendelson, Debbie Moskowitz, Don Taylor, David Zuroff, and the other members of the McGill Social-Personality Lunch Group for their comments on an earlier presentation of these findings.

This research was funded by grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada and the Fonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et l'Aide a la Recherche (FCAR-Quebec) to Richard Koestner. Support was also provided by a McGill Faculty Grant to Richard Koestner. Jennifer Aube was supported by a Graduate Fellowship from the SSHRC.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aube, J., Koestner, R., Hodgins, H. et al. Masculine traits and reports of social functioning: Evidence for a positivity bias. Sex Roles 31, 621–636 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544284

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544284

Keywords

Navigation