Skip to main content
Log in

The more (men), the less merry: Social density, social burden, and social support

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two questionnaire studies in rural Georgia examined how social and spatial density were related to social burden and social support. Results from the first study, which had 116 female respondents (82% white, 16% black, 2% Hispanic), indicated that high social density of males was related to less liking of the house and more psychological distress. Based on Study 1, it was hypothesized that high social density of males was related to less received social support whereas social density of females was related to more received social support. In partial support of that hypothesis, results from the second study, which involved 94 males and 105 females (83% white, 17% black), revealed that received emotional support was positively correlated with social density of females in the household. Also, consistent with Study 1, females considered males to be more burdensome than females. In addition, results from Study 2 suggested that males and females respond differently to social density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiello, J. R., Baum, A., & Gormley, F. P. (1981). Social determinants of residential crowding stress.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7 643–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akioka, L. M. (1988–1989).Georgia statistical abstract. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 1173–1182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, M., Jr. (1988). Models of social support and life stress: Beyond the buffering hypothesis. In L. H. Cohen (Ed.),Life events and psychological functioning. (pp. 211–236). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, M., Sandler, I. N., & Ramsay, T. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students.American Journal of Community Psychology, 9 435–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A., & Valins, S. (1977).Architecture and social behavior: Psychological studies of social density. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. R. (1981).Worlds of friendship. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of the Census. (1983).1980 census of population: General social and economic characteristics (PC80-1-C-12). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. W., Palsane, M. N., Lepore, S. J., & Martin, J. (1989). Residential density and psychological health: The mediating effects of social support.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 994–999.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W. R., & Hughes, M. (1983).Overcrowding in the household: An analysis of determinants and effects. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., & McLeod, J. D. (1985). Social support and psychological distress in community surveys. In S. Cohen & S. L. Syme (Eds.),Social support and health. (pp. 19–40). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakey, B. (1989). Personal and environmental antecedents of perceived social support developed at college.American Journal of Community Psychology, 17 503–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepore, S. J., Evans, G. W., & Schneider, M. L. (1991). Dynamic role of social support in the link between chronic stress and psychological distress.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 899–909.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Planning and Budget. (1989).Georgia descriptions in data. Atlanta: State of Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B. (1988).Prison crowding: A psychological perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Burnam, M. A., Schaeffer, M. A., & Harper, D. C. (1977). Lack of control as a determinant of perceived physical symptoms.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 167–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rook, K. S. (1984). The negative side of social interactions: Impact on psychological well-being.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 1097–1108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., Layton, B., Erickson, B., & Schopler, J. (1973). Affect, facial regard, and reactions to crowding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28 69–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruback, R. B., & Carr, T. S. (1984). Crowding in a women's prison: Attitudinal and behavioral effects.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruback, R. B., Carr, T. S., & Hopper, C. S. (1986). Perceived control in prison: Its relation to reported crowding, stress, and symptoms.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16 375–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruback, R. B., & Pandey, J. (1991). Crowding, perceived control, and relative power: An analysis of households in India.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21 315–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D., Rall, M., Pinner, B., & Schopler, J. (1973). Physical, social, and personal determinants of the perception of crowding.Environment and Behavior, 5 87–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaux, A. (1988).Social support: Theory, research, and intervention. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L. (1988). My year in Hong Kong: Some observations about social behavior.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14 410–420.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruback, R.B., Riad, J.K. The more (men), the less merry: Social density, social burden, and social support. Sex Roles 30, 743–763 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544229

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544229

Keywords

Navigation