Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment outcome of secondary orgasmic dysfunction: A two- to six-year follow-up

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sixty-six women reporting secondary orgasmic dysfunction and their partners, who received one of five group treatment formats, were sent questionnaires 2–6 years later. Thirty-eight of the women and 38 of the male partners responded to the follow-up questionnaires. Women who were not divorced and who did not receive additional treatment after group treatment (n =28) showed consistent increases across time in their ability to experience orgasm during intercourse, improving from a mean coital orgasmic frequency of 9.5% before treatment to 36.9% at long-term follow-up. Sexual harmony and coital frequency showed similar increases following treatment but had returned to near baseline levels 2–6 years later. Divorced women and women who received additional treatment (n =10) demonstrated greater declines in sexual harmony over the follow-up period than did their untreated counterparts. The subjects reported generally favorable reactions to treatment and stressed the importance of a treatment focus on communication and relationship skills. Regression analyses suggested the predictive importance of variables associated with the male partner's functioning. The implications of the results for clinical practice and for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach, G., and Bernhard, Y. (1971).Aggression Lab-The Fair-Fight Training Manual Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, P. (1976).Self-Assertion for Women: A Guide to Becoming Androgynous Canfield Press, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Amicis, L. A., Goldberg, D. C., LoPiccolo, J., Friedman, J., and Davies, L. (1985). Clinical follow-up of couples treated for sexual dysfunction.Arch. Sex. Behav. 14: 467–489.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, E., and Anderson, C. (1980, February 19). The sexual stages of marriage.Family Circle, pp. 64, 146, 148–149.

  • Hartman, W. E., and Fithian, M. A. (1972).Treatment of Sexual Dysfunction: A Biopsychosocial Approach Center for Marital and Sexual Studies, Long Beach, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, J. R., and LoPiccolo, J. (1983). Clinical outcome and sex therapy: Effects of daily versus weekly treatment.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 40: 443–449.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilman, P. R., and Mills, K. H. (1983).All About Sex Therapy Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilmann, P. R., Mills, K. H., Bella, B., Caid, C., Davidson, E., Drose, G., and Wanlass, R. (1983). The effects of sex education on women with secondary orgasmic dysfunction.J. Sex Marital Ther. 9: 79–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilmann, P. R., Mills, K. H., Caid, C., Bella, B., Davidson, E., and Wanlass, R. (1984). The sexual interactions of women with secondary orgasmic dysfunction and their partners.Arch. Sex. Behav. 13: 41–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilmann, P. R., Boland, J. P., Norton, S. P., Davidson, E., and Caid, C. (1986). Perspectives of sex therapy outcome: A survey of AASECT providers.J. Sex Marital Ther. 12: 116–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilmann, P. R., Mills, K., Caid, C., Davidson, E., Bella, B., Milan, R., Drose, G., Boland, J., Follingstad, D., Montgomery, B., and Wanlass, R. (1986). The treatment of secondary orgasmic dysfunction: An outcome study.Arch. Sex. Behav. 15: 211–229.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Libman, E., Fichten, C. S., Brender, W., Burstein, R., Cohen, J., and Binik, Y. (1984). A comparison of three therapeutic formats in the treatment of secondary orgasmic dysfunction.J. Marital Ther. 10: 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H. J., and Wallace, K. M., (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity.J. Marr. Fam. Living 21: 251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoPiccolo, J., and Lobitz, W. C. (1972). The role of masturbation in the treatment of orgasmic dysfunction.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoPiccolo, J., and Steger, J. (1974). The sexual interaction inventory: A new instrument for the assessment of sexual dysfunction.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 585–595.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, J. A., and Orthner, D. K. (1978). Recreational sexuality preferences among middleclass husbands and wives.J. Sex Res. 14: 96–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern, K. B., Stewart, R. C., and LoPiccolo, J. (1975). Secondary orgasmic dysfunction. I. Analysis and strategies for treatment.Arch. Sex. Behav. 4: 265–275.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milan, R. J., Jr., Kilmann, P. R., Boland, J., Mills, K., Caid, C., Davidson, E., Devine, J., and West, M. (1985).Group treatment of secondary orgasmic dysfunction. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Atlanta, GA, March.

  • Sotile, W. M., and Kilmann, P. R. (1978). The effects of group systematic desensitization on orgasmic dysfunction.Arch. Sex. Behav. 7: 477–491.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zilbergeld, B., and Kilmann, P. R. (1984). The scope and effectiveness of sex therapy.Psychotherapy 21: 319–326.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study is part of an investigation funded by NIMH Grant #MH32241.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milan, R.J., Kilmann, P.R. & Boland, J.P. Treatment outcome of secondary orgasmic dysfunction: A two- to six-year follow-up. Arch Sex Behav 17, 463–480 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542336

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542336

Key words

Navigation