Skip to main content
Log in

Summary

Water was sampled from a tributary of the Miramichi River of New Brunswick before, during, and up to two years after the final operational application of DDT to this area of forest. Gas chromatographic analysis of petroleum ether extracts of the water showed that only during and for a few hours after actual spray application did the DDT concentration in the stream exceed a steady background level of 0.5 ppb. pp 'DDT (<17 ppb.), and this DDT flush occurred mainly as a surface film associated with the formulating oil. Bottom sediments, extracted with hexane-acetone (2/1) for chromatographic analysis, showed a downstream dilution gradient of DDT residue from tributary to estuary, and these averaged only 12.5 per cent of the DDT concentration found in the soils of surrounding forests. Much of the pp' DDT applied in the original technical spray was decomposed to DDE and DDD in the bottom sediments of forest streams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MACDONALD, D.R., National Conference on Pollution and Our Environment, Paper B17-2, Montreal, P.Q. (1966).

  2. MACDONALD, J.R., Canada Fisheries Resource Development Branch Progress Report 1, Halifax, N.S. (1968).

  3. FLIEGER, B.W., Pulp and Paper, Canada,69, 91–96 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. HOPEWELL, W.W., Canada Department of Forestry, Chemical Control Section, Ottawa, Ontario. Interim Reports 1962-1,2,4.

  5. FETTES, J.J., Pulp and Paper, Canada,69, 99–105 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  6. COLE, H., BARRY, D., FREAR, D.E.H., BRADFORD, A., Bull. Env. Contam. and Tox.,2, 127–146 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. YULE, W.N., Bull. Env. Contain. and Tox. (in press).

  8. MORLEY, H.V., CHIBA, M., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists,47, 306–310 (1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. HOLDEN, A.V., Ann. appl. Biol.,50, 467–477, (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. FAUST, S.D., SUFFET, I.H., Residue Reviews,15, 44–116 (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. YULE, W.N., COLE, A.F.W., Proceedings of the Fourth International Agricultural Aviation Congress, Kingston, Ontario, 1969 (in press).

  12. GRANT, C.D., BROWN, A.W.A., Can. Ent.,99., 1040–1050 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. SPRAGUE, J.B., Can. Ent.,100, 279–284 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. WEBB, F.E., MACDONALD, D.R., RENAULT, T.R., Canada Department Agriculture, Forest Biology Lab., Fredericton, N.B., Interim Report 1958-4.

  15. WOODWELL, G.M., Scientific American,216, 24–31 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. MACDONALD, D.R., DUFFY, J.R., Canada Forestry Internal Report M-27, Fredericton, N.B. (1968).

  17. BREIDENBACH, A.W., GUNNERSON, C.G., KAWAHARA, F.K., LICHTENBERG, J.J., GREEN, R.S., Public Health Report,82, 139–156 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. MISKUS, R.P., BLAIR, D.P., CASIDA, J.E., J. Agr. Food Chem.,13, 481–483 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. SPENCER, D.A., Pesticides Monitor J.,1 (2), 54–57 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  20. METCALF, R.L.,Organic Insecticides, Interscience, London and N.Y., 392 pp. (1955).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Presently on study leave at Rutgers University, N.J., U.S.A.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yule, W.N., Tomlin, A.D. DDT in forest streams. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 5, 479–488 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539975

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539975

Keywords

Navigation