Skip to main content
Log in

Participation of the contractile system in endocytosis demonstrated in vivo by video-enhancement in heat-pretreated amoebae

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The heat-pretreated amoebae (hyalospheres) are well suited cell models to study several manifestations of endocytosis: invagination of initial funnels, formation of pinocytotic channels, their activity and disintegration, production of microand macroendosomes directly from the surface membrane. All these phenomena are rhythmically reproduced (with periods ranging from 9 to 27 s) at the same active spots on the cell surface and accompanied by pulsation of the adjacent peripheral cytoplasmic layers. Successive portions of the contractile cortical network are serially detached from the plasma membrane and retracted inwards (on average 1 detachment per 15 s). They are suggested to be responsible for the traction component of endocytotic movements, i.e., for pulling the initial invagination funnels, elongation of channels, and inward transport of macroendosomes which are embedded in them. On the other hand, retraction of the cortical network squeezes the hyaloplasm outwards and thus the pressure component of endocytosic is produced. This results in cell surface expansion around the orifice of endocytotic channels or formation of macroendosomes by constriction at the mouth of large surface invaginations. Moreover, the retracting cortical network produces various radial transhyaline strands which seem to play a, not fully understood, role in membrane invagination and inward transport of microendosomes, and to accompany cytoplasmic pulsation around channels. The contractile network lining the walls of the channels may be detected in vivo, when some old channels are destroyed and their membrane dissociates from the cytoskeletal sleeve. The central role of the rhythmic detachment of the contractile network from the plasma membrane is common to the locomotory and endocytotic movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chapman-Andresen C (1962) Studies on pinocytosis in amoebae. C R Trav Lab Carlsberg 33: 73–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Christofidou-Solomidou M, Brix K, Stockem W (1989) Induced pinocytosis and cytoskeletal organization inAmoeba proteus-a combined fluorescence and electron microscopic study. Eur J Protistol 24: 336–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo M (1989) Mechanics and control of the cytoskeleton inAmoeba proteus. Biophysical J 55: 1053–1080

    Google Scholar 

  • Filosa MF, Cusato LM (1986) The effects of three polar organic solvents on capping of surface immunoglobulin of mouse lymphocytes. Cell Mol Biol 32: 153–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grębecka L (1988 a) Polarity of the motor functions inAmoeba proteus. I. Locomotory behaviour. Acta Protozool 27: 83–96

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1988 b) Polarity of the motor functions inAmoeba proteus. II. Non-locomotory movements. Acta Protozool 27: 177–204

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Kalinina LV (1979) Effects of DMSO on the motor behaviour ofAmoeba proteus. Acta Protozool 18: 327–332

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Kłopocka W (1986) Morphological differences of pinocytosis inAmoeba proteus related to the nature of pinocytotic inducer. Protistologica 22: 265–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Grębecki A (1982) Supramolecular aspects of amoeboid movement. In: Proc VI Int Congr Protozool. Acta Protozool [special issue 1]: 117–130

  • — (1986) Two-directional pattern of movements on the cell surface ofAmoeba proteus. J Cell Sci 83: 23–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — (1987) Velocity distribution of the anterograde and retrograde transport of extracellular particles byAmoeba proteus. Protoplasma 141: 126–134

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1988) Bidirectional transport of extracellular material by the cell surface of locomotingSaccamoeba limax. Arch Protistenk 136: 139–151

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1990) Dynamics of the contractile system in the pseudopodial tips of normal locomoting amoebae demonstrated by video-enhancement in vivo. Protoplasma 154: 98–111

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Kwiatkowska EM (1988) Dynamics of membrane-cortex contacts demonstrated in vivo inAmoeba proteus pretreated by heat. Eur J Protistol 23: 262–272

    Google Scholar 

  • - Zaleska E (1986) Membrane-cortex interactions revealed in vivo in heat-pretreatedAmoeba proteus. In: II Eur Congr Cell Biol. Acta Biol Hung [Suppl] 37: Abstr 695

  • Heath JP (1981) Arcs: curved microfilament bundles beneath the dorsal surface of the leading lamellae of moving chick embryo fibroblasts. Cell Biol Int Rep 5: 975–980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — (1983) Behaviour and structure of the leading lamella in moving fibroblasts. I. Occurrence and centripetal movement of arcshaped microfilament bundles beneath the dorsal cell surface. J Cell Biol 60: 331–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman B, Albertini DF (1984) A time-lapse image intensification analysis of cytoplasmic organelle movement during endosome translation. J Cell Biol 98: 565–576

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon KW, Jeon MS (1983) Generation of mechanical forces in phagocytosing amoeba: light and electron microscopic study. J Protozool 30: 536–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Josefsson JO (1976) Studies on the mechanism of induction of pinocytosis inAmoeba proteus. Acta Physiol Scand 97 [Suppl 423]: 1–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein HP, Küster B, Stockem W (1988) Pinocytosis and locomotion of amoebae. XVIII. Different morphodynamic forms of endocytosis and microfilament organization inAmoeba proteus. Protoplasma [Suppl 2]: 76–87

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Stockem W (1979) Pinocytosis and locomotion of amoebae. XII. Dynamics and motive force generation during induced pinocytosis inAmoeba proteus. Cell Tissue Res 197: 263–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kłopocka W, Grebecka L (1985) Effect of bivalent cations on the initiation of Na-induced pinocytosis inAmoeba proteus. Protoplasma 126: 207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Stockem W, Grębecki A (1988) Fine structure and distribution of contractile layers inAmoeba proteus preincubated at high temperature. Protoplasma 147: 117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Korohoda W, Rakoczy L, Walczak T (1969) Effects of benzamide upon protoplasmic streamings and electric activity in slime molds plasmodia. Folia Biol 17: 195–209

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Stockem W (1975 a) On the nature of hyaline zones in the cytoplasm ofAmoeba proteus. Microsc Acta 77: 129–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — — (1975 b) Experimentally induced destabilization of the cell membrane and cell surface activity inAmoeba proteus. Cytobiologie 1: 93–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda Y, Kawamoto T (1986) Pinocytosis inDictyostelium discoideum cells. A possible implication of cytoskeletal actin for pinocytotic activity. Exp Cell Res 164: 516–526

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mast SO, Doyle WL (1934) Ingestion of fluids byAmoeba. Protoplasma 20: 553–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn M, Weber K (1980) Dimethylsulfoxide and the ionophore A23187 affect the arrangement of actin and induce nuclear actin paracrystals in PtK2 cells. Exp Cell Res 129: 103–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prusch RD, Minck DR (1985) Chemical stimulation of phagocytosis inA. proteus and the influence of external calcium. Cell Tissue Res 242: 557–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Seravin LN (1968) The role of mechanical and chemical stimulators of the induction of phagocytotic reactions inAmoeba proteus andAmoeba dubia. Acta Protozool 6: 97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotton DM (1988) Video-enhanced light microscopy and its applications in cell biology. J Cell Sci 89: 129–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soranno T, Bell E (1982) Cytoskeletal dynamics of spreading and translocating cells. J Cell Biol 95: 127–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stockem W, Klein HP (1988) Pinocytosis and locomotion of amoebae. XVII. Influence of different cations on induced pinocytosis inAmoeba proteus. Eur J Protistol 23: 317–326

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Kłopocka W (1988) Ameboid movement and related phenomena. Int Rev Cytol 112: 137–183

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Naib-Majani W, Wohlfarth-Bottermann KE, Osborn M, Weber K (1983) Pinocytosis and locomotion of amoebae. XIX. Immunocytochemical demonstration of actin and myosin inA. proteus. Eur J Cell Biol 29: 171–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor DL, Wang YL, Heiple JM (1980 a) Contractile basis of ameboid movement. VII. The distribution of fluorescently labeled actin in living amoebas. J Cell Biol 86: 590–598

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • —, Blinks JR, Reynolds G (1980 b) Contractile basis of ameboid movement. VIII. Aequorin luminescence during ameboid movement, endocytosis and capping. J Cell Biol 86: 599–607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlfahrth-Bottermann KE, Stockem W (1966) Pinocytose und Bewegung von Amöben. II. Permanente und induzierte Pinocytose beiAmoeba proteus. Z Zellforsch 73: 444–474

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grębecki, A. Participation of the contractile system in endocytosis demonstrated in vivo by video-enhancement in heat-pretreated amoebae. Protoplasma 160, 144–158 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539966

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539966

Keywords

Navigation