Skip to main content
Log in

Nucleotide analysis of DNA and RNA in cells with thymidine totally replaced by bromodeoxyuridine

  • Published:
Somatic Cell Genetics

Abstract

The nucleotide composition of nuclear DNA has been determined in a cell line (HAB) that has grown for 275 generations with complete substitution of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) for thymidine in nuclear DNA. Within 50 generations there is a ∼3% decrease in the G content and an equivalent increase in the BrdU content of DNA, relative to the unsubstituted parent cell line. However, these alterations do not continue to accumulate when the cells are grown for up to 275 generations with fully substituted DNA, suggesting that they are not brought about by BrdU-induced base transitions due to mispairing. RNA transcription has been examined both in vivo and in vitro to determine whether or not BrdU substitution in DNA results in large-scale transcriptional errors. The nucleotide composition of 18S and 28S rRNA from cells 0, 60%, and 100% substituted with BrdU does not significantly differ. Further, when DNA from these cells is transcribed in vitro with E. coli RNA polymerase, there is no evidence for altered incorporation of nucleotides into RNA made from the substituted templates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Freese, E. (1959).J. Mol. Biol. 1:87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bugg, C.E., Thomas, J.M., Sundaralingam, M., and Rao, S.T. (1971).Biopolymers 10:175–219.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davidson, R.L., and Bick, M.D. (1973).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:138–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bick, M.D., and Davidson, R.L. (1974).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71:2082–2086.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill, B.T., Tsuboi, A., and Baserga, R. (1974).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 71:455–459.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Randerath, E., and Randerath, K. (1965).Anal. Biochem. 12:83–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Studier, F.W. (1965).J. Mol. Biol. 11:373–390.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burgess, R.R. (1969).J. Biol. Chem. 244:6160–6167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sinclair, J.H., and Brown, D.D. (1971).Biochemistry 10:2761–2769.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, T.C., and Dove, W.F. (1972).J. Mol. Biol. 64:409–416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stambrook, P., and Williamson, R. (1974).Eur. J. Biochem. 48:297–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Trautner, T.A., Swartz, M.H., and Kornberg, A. (1962).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 48:449–455.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bick, M.D. (1975).Nucleic Acids Res. 2:1513–1523.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bick, M.D., Davidson, R.L. Nucleotide analysis of DNA and RNA in cells with thymidine totally replaced by bromodeoxyuridine. Somat Cell Mol Genet 2, 63–76 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539243

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539243

Keywords

Navigation