Abstract
Gastric mucosal thickening of variable degree occurs in the vicinity of gastric carcinomas and is possibly related to simultaneous tumor expression of epidermal growth factor and its receptor. Seventeen cases in which both endoscopic biopsy and subsequent resection for gastric carcinoma had been performed were studied to see if putative tumor-related mucosal thickening had an effect on endoscopic biopsy sensitivity. Biopsy fragment positivity rate was greater in cases with exophytic, protruding tumor masses (46.8± 8.5%) than in all other cases (17.0± 4.7%; P=0.02). Thickness of nontumorous mucosa adjacent to carcinomas did not significantly affect the biopsy fragment positivity rate in cases with exophytic masses (“thin” subgroup, 51.0±16.2%; “thick” subgroup, 44.0±10.8%; P=0.7) but did reduce the positivity rate significantly (P=0.05) in ulcerative or infiltrative tumors without exophytic components (“thin” subgroup, 23.3±4.1%; “thick” subgroup, 8.4±2.1%). This reduction in biopsy sensitivity related to mucosal thickening occurring adjacent to nonprotuberant lesions may explain, at least in part, the variable rates of positive biopsies observed with gastric cancers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Graham DY, Schwartz JT, Cain GD, Gyorkey F: Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology 82:228–231, 1982
Dekker W, Tytgat GN: Diagnostic accuracy of fiberendoscopy in the detection of upper intestinal malignancy. A follow-up analysis. Gastroenterology 73:710–714, 1977
Misumi A, Mori K, Ikeda T, et al: Evaluation of fibergastroscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. A study of 339 cases. Gastroenterol Jpn 13:255–263, 1978
Witzel L, Halter F, Gretillat PA, Scheurer U, Keller M: Evaluation of specific value of endoscopic biopsies and brush cytology for malignancies of the oesophagus and stomach. Gut 17:375–377, 1976
Shanghai Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Cooperative Group, People's Republic of China. Value of biopsy and brush cytology in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Gut 23:774–776, 1982
Qizilbash AH, Castelli M, Kowalski MA, Churly A: Endoscopic brush cytology and biopsy in the diagnosis of cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Acta Cytol 24:313–318, 1980
Sancho-Poch FJ, Balanzo J, Ocana J, Presa E, Sala-Cladera E, Cusso X, Vilardell F: An evaluation of gastric body in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 24:281–282, 1978
Lee EY, Wang TC, Clouse RE, DeSchryver-Kecskemeti K: Mucosal thickening adjacent to gastric malignancy: Association with epidermal growth factor. Mod Pathol 2:397–402, 1989
Winawer SJ, Posner G, Lightdale CJ, Sherlock P, Melamed M, Fortner JG: Endoscopic diagnosis of advanced cancer. Gastroenterology 69:1183–1187, 1975
Hatfield ARW, Slovin G, Segal AW, Levi AJ: Importance of the site of endoscopic gastric biopsy in ulcerating lesions of the stomach. Gut 16:854–856, 1975
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by a grant (AM07130) from the United States Public Health Service.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Awad, J.A., Lee, E.Y., Wang, T.C. et al. Effect of mucosal thickening near gastric carcinoma on the endoscopic diagnosis of malignancy. Digest Dis Sci 35, 317–320 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537408
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537408