Skip to main content
Log in

Eleven interpretations of personal suffering

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Suffering is carefully defined in contrast to pain as the psychological experience being investigated. Under consideration, however, is only one's own suffering and not the suffering of other people. Interpretation is identified as the way of perceiving personal suffering. In a nine sentence paragraph the statements describe the perceptual, affective, and action-tending components of an attitude. The implications of assuming a particular attitude are brought to light in summary fashion in another paragraph. Eleven attitudes toward personal suffering are thus described and criticized. An attitude scale of 99 items is constructed from the descriptive statements of these 11 attitudes toward personal suffering. Plans for further research are indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Berntzen, D., and Gotestam, K. G., “Effects of On-Demand versus Fixed-Interval Schedules in the Treatment of Chronic Pain with Analgesic Compounds,”J. Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1987,55, 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beutler, L. F., “Introduction to the Special Senses,”J. Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1987,54, 751.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Inability to Express Intense Affect: A Common Link Between Depression and Pain,”J. Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1987,54, 752–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, K. L., “The Neurophysiologic Basis of Pain,”Rostgraduate Medicine, 1973,53, 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, F.,The Meaning of Human Suffering. New York, Human Sciences Press, 1982, pp. xvii, 349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holroyd, K. H., and Holm, J. E., “Progress in Pair Assessment,”Contemporary Psychology, 1985,30, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Paul II, “The Christian Meaning of Human Suffering,”Origins, 1984,13, 609–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushner, H. S.,When Bad Things Happen to Good People. New York, Schocken Books, 1981, p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R.,Pain Measurement and Assessment. New York, Raven Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, M. G., and Tesser, A., “Effects of Affective and Cognitive Focus on the Attitude-Behavior Relation,”J. Personality and Social Psychology, 1986,51, 270–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk, D. C., and Rudy, T. E., “Assessment of Cognitive Factors in Chronic Pain: A Worthwhile Enterprise?”J. Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1986,54, 760–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, B. J., “Therapeutic Aspects of Chronic Pain: Modulation of Nociception, Alleviation of Suffering, and Behavioral Analysis,”Behavior Therapy, 1982, 430–437.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foley, D.P. Eleven interpretations of personal suffering. J Relig Health 27, 321–328 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01533200

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01533200

Keywords

Navigation