Skip to main content
Log in

Instructive feedback: Effects of number and type

  • Regular Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated the effects of presenting two instructive feedback stimuli of the same and different types for each target behavior taught. Four elementary school students with mild mental retardation were taught to name photographs of places of interest in the local community using constant time delay and instructive feedback. Initially, the four students were taught one set of photographs with one instructive feedback stimulus (name of the street on which the place was located) for each target photograph. All students learned to name all photographs, and three learned to name the street on which the place was located. The three students who learned to name the street for the place in the photograph were then taught three sets of photographs. Each set included two instructive feedback stimuli for each target photograph: Set 2 had one street name and one activity that occurred in the place; Set 3 had two activities per photograph, and Set 4 had one street name and one activity. The three students learned to name the photographs, but only learned to name the activities and not the street names that were presented through instructive feedback. These finds are discussed in terms of the factors that may control acquisition of instructive feedback stimuli and the implications for practice and future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example.Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demchak, M. (1990). Response prompting and fading methods: A review.American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 603–615.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, P. M., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Farmer, J. A. (1990). Use of constant time delay in small group instruction: A study of observational and incidental learning.Journal of Special Education, 23, 369–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, P. L. (1990).Effects of independent and interdependent group contingencies on acquisition, incidental learning, and observational learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Baklarz, J. L. (1991). Acquisition of incidental information during small group instruction.Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., Morris, L. L., Doyle, P. M., & Meyer, S. (1990). Teaching sight word reading in a group instructional arrangement using constant time delay.Exceptionality, 1, 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, D. M., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., & Collins, B. C. (1991). Acquisition of nontarget information during small-group instruction.Exceptionality, 2, 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984).Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., & Frederick, C. (1993). Effects of instructive feedback related and unrelated to the target behaviors.Exceptionality, 4, 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Alig-Cybriwsky, C., Gast, D. L., & Boyle-Gast, K. (1991). Use of constant time delay and attentional responses with adolescents.Exceptional Children, 57, 462–474.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992).Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities: Use of response prompting procedures. White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Cybriwsky, C. A., Doyle, P. M., Shuster, J. W., Ault, M. J., & Gast, D. L. (1992). Constant time delay with discrete responses: A review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters.Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 239–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Werts, M. G., & Cipollone, R. M. (1993). Effects of simultaneous prompting and instructive feedback.Early Education and Development, 4, 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., Holcombe, A., Billings, S. S., & Vassilaros, M. A. (1993). Instructive Feedback: A comparison of simultaneous and alternating presentation of non-target stimuli.Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gast, D.L., Doyle, P.M., Wolery, M. et al. Instructive feedback: Effects of number and type. J Behav Educ 4, 313–334 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531985

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531985

Key words

Navigation