Abstract
Public opinion data show that the most prevalent concern expressed regarding the insanity defense is that it is a loophole through which would-be criminals escape punishment for illegal acts. This article examines the extent to which the public's perceptions of the insanity defense are consistent with newly collected empirical data. Specifically, it compares perceptions of the use, success, and outcomes associated with the insanity defense to data derived from a large-scale study of insanity pleas in eight states. The analysis reveals that the public overestimates the use and success of an insanity defense and underestimates the extent to which insanity acquittees are confined upon acquittal. The role of selective media reporting in the formation of public perceptions is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appelbaum, P. (1982). The insanity defense: New calls for reform.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 13, 13–14.
Braff, J., Arvinites, T., & Steadman, H. J. (1983). Detention patterns of successful and unsuccessful insanity defendants.Criminology, 21 (3), 439–448.
Burton, N. M., & Steadman, H. J. (1978). Legal professionals' perceptions of the insanity defense.The Journal of Psychiatry and Law, Summer, 6, 173–187.
Callahan, L. A., Steadman, H. J., McGreevy, M. A., & Robbins, P. C. (1991). The volume and characteristics of insanity defense pleas: An eight state study.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 19(4), 331–338.
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1981). Health and medicine on television.New England Journal of Medicine, 305, 901–904.
Hans, V. P. (1986). An analysis of public attitudes toward the insanity defense.Criminology, 4(2), 393–415.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1991). Length of detention in matched groups of insanity acquittees and convicted offenders.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 14, 223–236.
Kahn, M. W., & Raifman, L. (1981). Hospitalization versus imprisonment and the insanity plea.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8(4), 483–490.
Newsweek, (1992), February 3). Insanity: A defense of last resort.Newsweek, p. 49.
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy.American Political Science Review, 77, 175–190.
Pasewark, R. A., Pantle, M. L., & Steadman, H. J. (1982). Detention and rearrest rates of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity and convicted felons.American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 892–897.
Pasewark, R. A., & Seidenzahl, D. (1979). Opinions concerning the insanity plea and criminality among mental patients.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 7(2), 199–202.
Perlin, M. L. (1993). Decoding right to refuse treatment law.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 16, 151–177.
Roberts, C. F., & Golding, S. L. (1991). The social construction of criminal responsibility and insanity.Law and Human Behavior, 15(4), 349–376.
Roberts, C. F., Golding, S. L., & Finchman, F. D. (1987). Implicit theories of criminal responsibility.Law and Human Behavior, 11(3), 207–232.
Steadman, H. J., McGreevy, M. A., Morrissey, J., Callahan, L. A., Robbins, P. C., & Cirincione, C. (1993).Before and after Hinckley: Evaluating insanity defense reform. New York: Guilford.
Steadman, H. J. (1985). Empirical research on the insanity defense.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 477, 58–71.
Steadman, H. J., & Cocozza, J. C. (1978). Public perceptions of the criminally insane.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 29(7), 457–459.
Time. (1992, February 3). Do mad acts a madman make?Time, p. 17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Silver, E., Cirincione, C. & Steadman, H.J. Demythologizing inaccurate perceptions of the insanity defense. Law Hum Behav 18, 63–70 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499144
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499144