Skip to main content
Log in

Determinations of negligence and the hindsight bias

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

Examined the hindsight bias in determinations of negligence inTarasoff-type cases. The sample of 297 community residents was asked to read clinical case scenarios involving treatment of potentially dangerous patients. Scenarios varied by outcome: (1) the patient became violent, (2) the patient did not become violent, and (3) no outcome was specified. Respondents rated the foreseeability of violence, the reasonableness of therapist actions, and negligence. It was hypothesized that respondents who were informed that the patient became violent would be more likely to find the therapist negligent than respondents in the other two outcome conditions. Findings supported this, and respondents in the violent outcome condition rated the violence as more foreseeable and therapist actions as less reasonable. Implications for mental health and legal professionals are discussed and future research ideas are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appelbaum, P. S. (1985). Implications ofTarasoff for clinical practice. In J. C. Beck (Ed.),The potentially violent patient and the Tarasoff decision in psychiatric practice (pp. 93–108). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S. (1984). The expansion of liability for patient's violent acts.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 35, 13–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arkes, H. R., Faust, D., Guilmette, T. J., & Hart, K. (1988). Eliminating the hindsight biasJournal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 305–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkes, H. R., Wortmann, R. L., Saville, P. D., & Harkness, A. R. (1981). Hindsight bias among physicians weighing the likelihood of diagnoses.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 252–254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J., & Hershey, J. C. (1988). Outcome bias in decision evaluation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 569–579.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. C. (1990). The potentially violent patient: Clinical, ethical and legal considerations. In E. A. Margenau (Ed.).The encyclopedic handbook of private practice (pp. 697–709). New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. C. (1985). A clinical survey ofTarasoff experience. In J. C. Beck (Ed.).The potentially violent patient and the Tarasoff decision in psychiatric practice (pp. 59–82). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Second-guessing the jury: Stereotypic and hindsight biases in perceptions of court cases.Journal of Applied Social psychology, 20, 1112–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borum, R., Otto, R., & Golding, S. L. (1993). Improving clinical judgment and decision making in forensic evaluation.Journal of Psychiatry & Law. 21(1), 35–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, S. L., & Schumacher, J. E. (1990). Impact of litigation on psychotherapy practice: Litigation fears and litigaphobia. In E. A. Margenau (Ed.),The encyclopedic handbook of private practice (pp. 664–676). New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Second-guessing the jury: Stereotypic and hindsight biases in perceptions of court cases.Journal of Applied Social psychology, 20, 1112–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borum, R., Otto, R., & Golding, S. L. (1993). Improving clinical judgment and decision making in forensic evaluation.Journal of Psychiatry & Law. 21(1), 35–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, S. L.,& Schumacher, J. E. (1990). Impact of litigation on psychotherapy practice: Litigation fears and litigaphobia. In E. A. Margenau (Ed.),The encyclopedic handbook of private practice (pp. 664–676). New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper, J. D., Benedict, K., & Perry, J. L. (1989). Juror decision-making, attitudes, and the hindsight bias.Law and Human Behavior. 13, 291–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J., & Willham, C. F. (1991). The hindsight bias: A meta-analysis.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, D., & Olson, M. (1993). A demonstration of hindsight has using the Thomas confirmation vote.Psychological Reports. 72, 377–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsighεforesight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbertson, L. J., Dietrich, D., Olson, M., & Guenther, R. K. (1994). A study of hindsight bias: The Rodney King case in retrospect.Psychological Reports, 74, 383–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gournic, S. J. (1990). Professional standards and hindsight bias: Implications for determinations of negligence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. State University of New York, Buffalo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, S. A., & Hastie, R., (1990). Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known.Psychological Bulletin, 107, 311–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kermani, E. J., & Drob, S. L. (1987).Tarasoff decision: A decade later dilemma still faces psychotherapists.American Journal of Psychotherapy, XLI, 271–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megargee, E. I. (1995). Assessing and understanding aggressive and violent patients. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.),Clinical personality assessment (pp. 395–409). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, C. J. (1987). Hard cases: The “duty to warn”as a felt necessity of our time.Journal of Psychitry and Law. 15(2), 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poythress, N. G. (1989). Negligent release litigation: A proposal for procedural reform.The Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 17, 595–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poythress, N. G., Wiener, R., & Schumacher, J. E. (1992). Reframing the medical malpractice tort reform debate: Social science research implications for noneconomic reforms.Law and Psychology Review, 16, 65–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L. G., & Meisel, J. D. (1977). Dangerousness, confidentiality, and duty to warn.American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 508–511.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (1987). Mental health professionals and the duty to warn: An economic analysis.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 10, 311–337.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schkade, D. A., & Kilbourne, L. M. (1991). Expectation-outcome consistency and hindsight bias.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, D., & Adair, J. G. (1993). Reversibility of the hindsight bias: Manipulation of experimental demands.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 233–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, S. K. (1987). Therapists bear a duty to commit, says U.S. District Court Judge.Mental Health Law Reporter, 4-5.

  • Szasz, T. (1986). The case against suicide prevention.American Psychologist, 41, 806–812.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California 551 P.2d 334 (Cal. 1976).

  • Wexler, D. B., & Schopp, R. F. (1989). How and when to correct for juror hindsight bias in mental health malpractice litigation: Some preliminary observations.Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 485–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. D. (1992). Bias and debiasing techniques in forensic psychology,American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 10, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. W., Less-Haley, P. R., & Brown, R. S. (1993). Human response to traumatic events:An integration of counterfactual thinking, hindsight bias, and attribution theory.Psychological Reports, 72, 483–494.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (1978). The knew-it-all-along effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 345–353.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan J. LaBine.

About this article

Cite this article

LaBine, S.J., LaBine, G. Determinations of negligence and the hindsight bias. Law Hum Behav 20, 501–516 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499038

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499038

Keywords

Navigation