Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Correlational studies have found candidate traits to be an important determinant of vote preferences but cannot rule out reverse causality processes in explaining these findings. The present study demonstrates the independent impact of trait inferences on candidate evaluations using experimentally controlled candidate profiles of hypothetical U.S. congressmen. Using the scandal situation as a testing ground, this experiment examines whether task-relevant, competence traits actually have greater impact on political judgments than the more general, warmth-related trait qualities. Two types of scandals are considered (marital infidelity and tax evasion), both implying negative trustworthiness characteristics of the officeholder. Results demonstrate that trait inferences do have a causal impact on global evaluations. Consistent with past survey studies, competence qualities appear to be more important than warmth qualities but only for those with greater political information levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz, Alan I. (1988). Explaining Senate election outcomes.American Political Science Review 82: 385–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, Alan I. (1991). Incumbency, campaign spending, and the decline of competition in U.S. House elections.Journal of Politics 53: 34–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Deborah, and Krisi Andersen (1993). Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits.Political Research Quarterly 46: 527–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, John, Holly Teeters, Daniel S. Ward, and Rick K. Wilson (1994). Overdraft: The political cost of congressional malfeasance.Journal of Politics 56: 788–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, Gerald Gurin, and Warren E. Miller (1954).The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. (1960).The American Voter. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlston, D. E. (1980). The recall and use of traits and events in social inference processes.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16: 303–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS New/New York Times Poll, January 17–21, 1988.

  • Conover, Pamela J., Donald D. Searing, and F. P. Zinni (1988). Socialization, Civic Virtue, and Civic Behavior. Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.

  • Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter (1991). Stability and change in the U.S. public's knowledge of politics.Public Opinion Quarterly 55:583–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, Richard F. Jr. (1978).Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan T., Donald R. Kinder, and W. M. Larter (1983). The novice and the expert: Knowledge-based strategies in political cognition.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19: 381–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan T., Richard R. Lau, and R. A. Smith (1990). On the varieties and utilities of political expertise.Social Cognition 8: 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, Carolyn L. (forthcoming). Understanding trait inferences in candidate images. In Michael X. Delli Carpini, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Y. Shapiro (eds.),Research in Micropolitics. JAI.

  • Glass, David P. (1985). Evaluating presidential candidates: Who focuses on their personal attributes?Public Opinion Quarterly 49: 517–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groseclose, Timothy, and Keith Krehbiel (1994). Golden parachutes, rubber checks, and strategic retirements from the 102d House.American Journal of Political Science 38: 75–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamill, Ruth, and Milton Lodge (1986). Cognitive consequences of political sophistication. In R. R. Lau and D. O. Sears (eds.),Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen (1993a). The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office.Political Research Quarterly 46: 503–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen (1993b). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates.American Journal of Political Science 37: 119–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary C., and Michael A. Dimock (1993). Checking Out: The Effects of Bank Overdrafts on the 1992 House Elections. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 15–17.

  • Judd, Charles M., and J. W. Downing (1990). Political expertise and development of attitude consistency.Social Cognition 8: 104–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, Donald R. (1983). Presidential Traits. Report to the NES Board of Overseers. Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan.

  • Kinder, Donald R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.),Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, Donald R., M. D. Peters, Robert P. Abelson, and Susan T. Fiske (1980). Presidential prototypes.Political Behavior 2: 315–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, Helena Chmura, and Sue Thiemann (1987).How Many Subjects? Statistical Power Analysis in Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, Jon A. (1990). Lessons learned: A review and integration of our findings.Social Cognition 8: 154–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, Jon A., and Donald R. Kinder (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming.American Political Science Review 84: 497–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Gladys E., and Kurt Lang (1983).The Battle for Public Opinion: The President, the Press, and the Polls During Watergate. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, Milton, Kathleen M. McGraw, and Patrick Stroh (1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evalution.American Political Science Review 83: 399–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, Gregory (1982). Political attitudes during an election year: A report on the 1980 NES panel study.American Political Science Review 76: 538–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, Kathleen M., and Neil Pinney (1990). The effects of general and domainspecific expertise on political memory and judgment.Social Cognition 8: 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H. (1990). Public judgments of Senate and House candidates.Legislative Studies Quarterly 25: 525–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H., and Warren E. Miller (1976). Ideology in the 1972 election: Myth or reality—A rejoinder.American Political Science Review 70: 832–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H., Martin P. Wattenberg, and O. Malanchuk (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates.American Political Science Review 80: 521–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, Jeffrey J. (1994). Competence, Integrity, and the Electoral Success of Congressional Incumbents. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 14–16.

  • Newman, Leonard S., and James S. Uleman (1990).Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections: Rational Man and Electoral Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, John G., and Susan Welch (1978). Political corruption in America: A search for definitions and a theory, or if political corruption is in the mainstream of American politics why is it not in the mainstream of American politics research.American Political Science Review 72: 974–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, John G., and Susan Welch (1980). The effects of charges of corruption on voting behavior in congressional elections.American Political Science Review 74: 697–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, Patrick A. (1994). Political sophistication and the use of candidate traits in candidate evaluation.Political Psychology 14: 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Samuel L. 1991.The Reasoning Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahn, Wendy M., John H. Aldrich, Eugene Borgida, and John L. Sullivan (1990). A social-cognitive model of candidate appraisal. In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.),Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahn, Wendy M., John H. Aldrich, and Eugene Borgida (1994). Individual and contextual variations in political candidate appraisal.American Political Science Review 88: 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Seymour, and Andrea Sedlak (1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. In L. Berkowitz (ed.),Advances in Social Psychology, vol. 6. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Zick (1973).Liking and Loving: An Invitation to Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundquist, Barry, Gerald D. Strom, and John G. Peters (1977). Corrupt politicians and their electoral support: Some experimental observations.American Political Science Review 71: 954–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, David M., Steven J. Sherman and David L. Hamilton (1987). Illusory correlation in the perception of individuals and groups.Social Cognition 5: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, Michael (1992).Watergate in American Memory. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Robert M. (1990). Economic voting for govenor and U.S. senator: The electoral consequences of federalism.Journal of Politics 52: 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, Laura (1993). Judging presidential character: The demise of Gary Hart.Political Behavior 15: 193–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisman, S. R. (1984). Can the magic prevail?New York Times Magazine, April 29, pp. 38–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q., and E. C. Banfield (1964). Public-regardingness as a value premise in voting behavior.American Political Science Review 58: 876–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q., and E. C. Banfield (1971). Political ethos revisited.American Political Science Review 65: 1048–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, Robert S., Jr., Thomas K. Srull, and S. E. Gordon (1984). The effects of predicting a person's behavior on subsequent trait judgments.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 20: 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, Robert S., Jr., Thomas Lee Budesheim, Sharon Shavitt, Ellen D. Riggle, R. Jeffrey Melton, and James H. Kuklinski (1991). Image, issues, and ideology: The processing of information about political candidates.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 533–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John (1990). Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response.Social Cognition 8: 125–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John R. (1992).The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Rice University, P.O. Box 1892, 77251, Houston, TX

    Carolyn L. Funk

Authors
  1. Carolyn L. Funk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Funk, C.L. The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits. Polit Behav 18, 1–24 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498658

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498658

Keywords

Search

Navigation