Skip to main content
Log in

Mousepox in inbred mice innately resistant or susceptible to lethal infection with ectromelia virus. IV. Studies with the Moscow strain

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The pathogenesis and transmission of infection with the Moscow strain of ectromelia virus were studied in inbred mice. BALB/cAnNcr had high morbidity and mortality and C57BL/6Ncr (B6) mice had high morbidity and low mortality. Virus was detected in B6 mice for 2 weeks after subcutaneous (s.c.) inoculation and infected mice developed lesions compatible with acute mousepox. B6 inoculated by footpad transmitted infection to cagemates for up to five weeks and soiled cages that had housed infected mice were infectious for three weeks. S.c.-inoculated B6 mice also transmitted by contact for 2 weeks. Transmission was attributed to oronasal excretion of virus. Airborne transmission of infection between adjacent cages occurred at a low rate. Ectromelia virus-free progeny were derived from previously infected dams. These studies indicate that the highly virulent and infectious Moscow strain of ectromelia virus caused self-limiting infection in inbred mice and that direct contact is the most efficient means of transmission. These findings support the concept that mousepox can be contained by husbandry practices that minimize or eliminate the spread of infection by direct contact or fomites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhatt PN, Jacoby RO (1987) Mousepox in inbred mice innately resistant or susceptible to lethal infection with ectromelia virus. I. Clinical responses. Lab Anim Sci 37: 9–13

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhatt PN, Jacoby RO (1987) Mousepox in inbred mice innately resistant or susceptible to lethal infection with ectromelia virus. III. Experimental transmission of infection and derivation of virus-free progeny from previously infected dams. Lab Anim Sci 37: 23–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fenner F (1947) Studies in infectious ectromelia in mice (mouse-pox). III. Natural transmission: elimination of the virus. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 25: 327–335

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fenner F (1949) Studies in mousepox (infectious ectromelia of mice). VI. A comparison of the virulence and infectivity of three strains of ectromelia virus. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 27: 31–43

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fenner F (1949) Mousepox (infectious ectromelia): a review. J Immunol 63: 341–373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fenner F (1988) Personal communication

  7. Hsu SM, Raine L, Fanger H (1981) Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase technique: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures. J Histochem Cytochem 29: 577–580

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacoby RO, Bhatt PN, Johnson EA, Paturzo F (1983) Pathogenesis of vaccinia (IHDT) virus infection in BALB/cAnN mice. Lab Anim Sci 33: 435–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacoby RO, Bhatt PN (1987) Mousepox in inbred mice innately resistant or susceptible to lethal infection with ectromelia virus. II. Pathogenesis. Lab Anim Sci 37: 14–20

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marchal J (1930) Infectious ectromelia. A hitherto undescribed virus disease of mice. J Pathol Bacteriol 33: 713–728

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parker TC, Richter CB (1982) Viral diseases of the respiratory system. In: Foster H, Fox J, Small JD (eds) The mouse in biomedical research, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 110–158

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reed LJ, Muench H (1938) A simple method of estimating fifty percent end points. Am J Hyg 27: 493–497

    Google Scholar 

  13. Small JD, New AE (1981) Prevention and control of Mousepox. Lab Anim Sci 31: 616–621

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wallace GD, Werner RM, Golway PL, et al (1981) Epizootiology of an outbreak of mousepox at the National Institutes of Health. Lab Anim Sci 31: 31: 609–615

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wallace GW, Buller RML (1985) Kinetics of ectromelia virus (mousepox) transmission and clinical response in C57BL/6J, BALB/cByJ, and AKR/J inbred mice. Lab Anim Sci 35: 41–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weir EC, Bhatt PN, Barthold SW, Cameron GA, Simack PA (1987) Elimination of mouse hepatitis virus from a breeding colony by temporary cessation of breeding. Lab Anim Sci 37: 455–458

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhatt, P.N., Jacoby, R.O. & Gras, L. Mousepox in inbred mice innately resistant or susceptible to lethal infection with ectromelia virus. IV. Studies with the Moscow strain. Archives of Virology 100, 221–230 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01487685

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01487685

Keywords

Navigation