Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of various factors influencing esophageal pressure measurement

I. Significance of methodical factors in intraluminal manometry

Der Einfluß verschiedener Faktoren auf die Ösophagusdruckmessung

I. Bedeutung methodischer Faktoren für die intraluminale Manometrie

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die intraluminale Manometrie wird zunehmend für die Diagnose ösophagealer Motilitätsstörungen eingesetzt. Die klinische Validität der Methode hängt jedoch entscheidend von einer exakten Standardisierung der Methodik, des Untersuchungsablaufes und der Kenntnis der Einflußgrößen auf das Meßergebnis ab. Im ersten Teil dieser Studie wurde der Einfluß verschiedener methodischer Faktoren auf das Ergebnis der Ösophagusdruckmessung in Modellversuchen, bei 44 gesunden Probanden und bei 74 Patienten mit axialer Hiatushernie mit einem elektromagnetischen Mikrotransducer untersucht. Signifikante Unterschiede der Meßwerte fanden sich in Abhängigkeit von der Sensorposition im oberen Ösophagussphinkter (p<0,001), von der Körperposition (Sitzen/Liegen) (p<0,005) und von der Art der Schluckakteinleitung (Trockenschlucken/Bolusgabe) (p<0,005). Keinen signifikanten Einfluß auf das Ergebnis der Druckmessung hatten dagegen unterschiedliche Durchzugsgeschwindigkeiten der Meßsonde und die Dauer der Untersuchung. Eine mechanische Stimulation des unteren Ösophagussphinkters durch den Meßvorgang war nicht nachweisbar.

Summary

Intraluminal manometry is increasingly used for the diagnosis of esophageal motor abnormalities. Clinical validity of this method depends on the exact standardization of methods, the performance of the study and on the knowledge of the factors influencing pressure measurement. In the first part of this study the significance of various methodical factors for esophageal pressure measurement accuracy was analysed in bench studies, in 44 healthy subjects and in 74 patients with hiatus hernia using an electromagnetic microtransducer. Significant differences of pressure values were observed depending on 1. sensor position in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) (p<0.001), 2. body position (sitting vs. supine) (p<0.005) and 3. the mode of eliciting peristaltic pressure waves (dry vs. wet swallow) (p<0.005). No significant effect on pressure measurement results could be confirmed for the velocity of transducer pull-through and duration of the manometric examination. No mechanical irritation of the lower esophageal sphincter due to movements of the measuring probe was observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Babka, J.C., Hager, G.W., Castell, D.: The effect of body position on lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Dig. Dis.18, 441–442 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bloom, A.A., Stekelman, M., Varadee, R., Carvajal, S., Davidson, M.: Resting pressures in the lower esophageal sphincter. Am. J. Dig. Dis.19, 1120–1123 (1974)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boesby, S., Söndergaard, E.Y., Madsen, T.: A simple system for the recording of oesophageal peristalsis, and the influence of bolus volume on peak peristaltic pressure amplitude. Scand. J. Gastroenterol.13, 149–153 (1978)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Code, C.F., Schlegel, J.F.: The pressure profile of the gastroesophageal sphincter in man: an improved method of detection. Proc. Mayo Clin.33, 406–414 (1958)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Demeester, T.R., Lawrence, F.J., Joseph, G.J., Toscano, M.S., Hall, A.W., Skinner, D.B.: Patterns of gastroesophageal reflux in health and disease. Ann. Surg.184, 459–470 (1976)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dent, J.: A new technique for continuous sphincter pressure measurement. Gastroenterology71, 263–267 (1976)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dodds, W.J., Hogan, W.J., Reid, D.P., Stewart, E.T., Arndorfer, R.C.: A comparison between primary esophageal peristalsis following wet and dry swallows. J. Appl. Physiol.35, 851–857 (1973)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dodds, W.J., Hogan, W.J., Stef, J.J., Miller, W.N., Lydon, S.B., Arndorfer, R.C.: A rapid pull-through technique for measuring lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Gastroenterology68, 437–443 (1975a)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dodds, W.J., Miller, W.N., Hogan, W.J., Arndorfer, R.C., Lydon, S.B., Stef, J.J.: Influence of extrinsic forces on intraluminal lower esophageal sphincter pressure (Abstr.). Gastroenterology68, 885 (1975b)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dodds, W.J., Stef, J.J., Hogan, W.J.: Factors determining pressure measurement accuracy by intraluminal esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology70, 117–123 (1976)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Förster, Ch. F., Weihrauch, T.R., Höhle, K.D., Seitz, W.: Intraluminale Druckmessung mit einem neuen elektronischen Meßwertwandler. Verh. Dtsch. Ges. Inn. Med.82, 989–991 (1976)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Förster, Ch. F., Weihrauch, T.R., Brummer, A., Vallerius, P., Lehmann, H.: A new electronic transducer system for gastrointestinal pressure studies. Med. Progr. Technol.4, 169–175 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hollis, J.B., Castell, D.O.: Effect of dry swallows and wet swallows of different volumes on esophageal peristalsis. J. Appl. Physiol.38, 1161–1164 (1975)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaye, M.D., Showalter, J.P.: Manometric configuration of the lower esophageal sphincter in normal human subjects. Gastroenterology61, 213–223 (1971)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaye, M.D., Showalter, J.P., Rock, K.C., Johnson, E.: A circumferentially-sensitive miniature transducer for study of human esophageal motility (Abstr.). Gastroenterology64, 752 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Waldeck, F.: A new procedure for functional analysis of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Pflügers Arch.335, 74–84 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Waldeck, F., Jennewein, H.M., Siewert, R.: Manometric methods for measuring rapid pressure changes in the esophagus and its sphincters. Proc. 4th Internat. Symp. on Gastrointestinal Motility (1973) Banff, Alberta, Canada. p. 449–456. Vancouver: Mitchell Press 1974

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weihrauch, T.R., Förster, Ch. F.: A new transducer system for intraluminal esophageal manometry (Abstr.). Gastroenterology72, 1147 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weihrauch, T.R.: Ein neues intrakorporales Meßwertwandlersystem für manometrische Funktionsprüfungen am oberen Gastrointestinaltrakt. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Methodik und klinischen Anwendung. Habilitationsschrift, Mainz 1978

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weihrauch, T.R., Vallerius, P., Alpers, H., Ewe, K.: Assessment of various factors influencing esophageal pressure measurement accuracy. II. Significance of physiological factors in intraluminal manometry. Klin. Wochenschr.58, 287–292 (1980)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wienbeck, M.: The present status of esophageal manometry. Acta Hepato-Gastroenterol.23, 59–67 (1976a)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Winans, C.S.: Manometric asymmetry of the lower esophageal high pressure zone (Abstr.). Gastroenterology62, 830 (1972a)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Winans, C.S.: The pharyngoesophageal closure mechanism: a manometric study. Gastroenterology63, 768–777 (1972b)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Winans, C.S.: Manometric asymmetry of the lower-esophageal high-pressure zone. Dig. Dis.22, 348–354 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

To Prof. Dr. H.P. Wolff on the occasion of his 65th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weihrauch, T.R., Brummer, A., Biewener, H. et al. Assessment of various factors influencing esophageal pressure measurement. Klin Wochenschr 58, 279–285 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01476569

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01476569

Schlüsselwörter

Key words

Navigation