Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction-an in vitro study of isometry

Part II. Tests using an experimental PCL graft model

  • Originals Biomechanics
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Isometric positioning of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) graft is important for successful reconstruction of the PCL-deficient knee. This study documents the relationship between graft placement and changes in intra-articular graft length during a passive range of motion of the knee. In eight cadaveric knees the PCL was identified and cut. The specimens were mounted in a stabilising rig. PCL reconstruction was performed using a 9-mm-thick synthetic cord passed through tunnels 10 mm in diameter. Three different femoral graft placement sites were evaluated: (1) in four specimens the tunnel was located around the femoral isometric point, (2) in two specimens the tunnel was positioned over the guide wire 5 mm anterior to the femoral isometric point, (3) in two specimens the tunnel was positioned over the guide wire 5 mm posterior to the isometric femoral point. In all knees only one tibial tunnel was created around the isometric tibial point. The location of the isometric points is described in part I of this study. The proximal end of the cord was fixed to the lateral aspect of the femur. Distally, the cord was attached to a measuring unit. The knees were flexed from 0° to 110°, and the changes in the graft distance between the femoral attachment sites were measured in 10° steps. Over the entire range of motion measured, the femoral tunnels positioned around the isometric point produced femorotibial distance changes of within 2 mm. The anteriorly and posteriorly placed tunnels produced considerable changes in femorotibial distance with knee flexion, e.g. about 8 mm at 110° of flexion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clancy WG Jr, Shelbourne KD, Zoellner GB et al (1983) Treatment of knee joint instability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65:310–322

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friederich NF, O'Brien WR (1990) Zur funktionellen Anatomie der Kreuzbänder. In: Jakob RP, Stäubli HU (eds) Kniegelenk und Kreuzbänder. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Funahashi TT, Kaufmann KR, Daniel DM (1993) Isometry and graft placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery. Oper Tech Sports Med 1:110–114

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gotzen L, Petermann J (1989) Komplexe Kapselbandverletzungen des Knies mit Rupturen des hinteren Kreuzbandes. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II:524

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grood ES, et al. (1989) Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part I. The posterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 17:197–207

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hermans GPH, Schaap GR, Rutgers V (1992) Results of two different operation procedures in chronic disabling PCL reconstruction (abstract). First World Congress of Sports Trauma, pp 34–35

  7. Ogata K, McCarthy JA (1992) Measurement of length and tension patterns during reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 20:351–355

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petermann, J., Gotzen, L. & Trus, P. Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction-an in vitro study of isometry. Knee Surg, Sports traumatol, Arthroscopy 2, 104–106 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01476482

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01476482

Key Words

Navigation