Abstract
Most of the traditional methods of determining the intensity of the ancient geomagnetic field from archaeological materials utilized thermal demagnetization of the natural remanent magnetization (NRM) and of the laboratory induced thermoremanent magnetization (TRM). When applied rigorously these methods are foolproof. They are, however, very time consuming and the number of samples with which they can be used is limited. Attempts to speed up these traditional methods have generally led to the use of subjective criteria in assessing the reliability of the results and archaeomagnetic research has recently been concentrated on extending the range of samples to which the method can be applied. Through the use of alternating field, rather than thermal, demagnetization of NRM and TRM it has become possible to apply corrections for alteration occurring during laboratory firing of the archaeological samples and develop objective criteria of reliability. Recent research has shown that it may be possible to determine archaeointensities the laboratory redeposition of lake sediments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ade-Hall, J. M., Khan, M. A., Dagley, P., and Wilson, R. L.: 1968, A Detailed Opaque, Petrological and Magnetic Investigation of a Single Lava Flow from Scotland-III. Investigation into, the Possibility of Obtaining the Intensity of the Ambient Magnetic Field at the Time of Cooling of the Flow’,Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 16, 401–415.
Banerjee, S. K. and Mellema, J. P.: 1974, “A New Method for the Determination of Palaeointensity from the ARM Properties of Rocks’,Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.23 177–184.
Carmichael, C. M.: 1967, ‘An Outline of the Intensity of the Palaeomagnetic Field of the Earth’,Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 3, 351–354.
Creer, K. M., Barton, C. E. and Tucholka, P.: 1983,Geomagnetism of Baked Clays and Recent Sediments. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Coe, R. S. and Gromme, C. S.: 1973, ‘A Comparison of Three Methods of Determining Geomagnetic Palaeointensities’,J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 24E5, 415–435.
Collinson, D. W. and Stephenson, A.: 1977, ‘Palaeointensity Determination of Lunar Samples’,Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 13, 380–385.
Dunlop, D. J. and Stirling, J. M.: 1977, ‘Hard’ Viscous Remanent Magnetization (VRM) in Fine-Grained Haematite’,Geophys. Res. Lett. 4, 163–166.
Fox, J. M. W. and Aitken, M. J.: 1980, ‘Archaeomagnetism: Cooling Rate Dependance of TRM’,Nature 2831 462–462.
Kono, M.: 1978, ‘Reliability of Palaeointensity Methods Using Alternating Field Demagnetization and Anhysteretic Remanence’,Geophys. J.R. Astron. Soc. 54, 241–261.
Kono, M. and Ueno, N.: 1977, ‘Palaeointensity Determination by a Modified Thellier Method’,Phys. Earth Planet. Inter..13, 305–314.
Lawley, E. A.: 1970 ‘The Intensity of the Tertiary Geomagnetic Field in Iceland During, Neogene Polarity Transitions and Systematic Deviations’,Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 10, 145–149.
Lowrie, W. and Fuller, M.: 1969, Effect of Annealing on Coercive Force and Remanent Magnetization in Magnetite’,J. Geophys. Res. 74, 2698–2710.
McElhinny, M. W. and Evans, M. E., 1968, ‘An Investigation of the Strength of the Geomagnetic Field in the Early Precambrian’,Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 1, 485–497.
Nagata, T.: 1943, ‘The Natural Remanent Magnetism of Volcanic Rocks and Its Relation to Geomagnetic Phenomena’,Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo 21, 1.
Pullaiah, G., Irving, E., Buchan, K. L., and Dunlop, D. J.: 1975, ‘Magnetization Changes Caused by Burial and Uplift’,Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 28, 133–143.
Rigotti, P. A.: 1978, ‘The ARM Correction Method of Palaeointensity Determination’,Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 39, 417–426.
Rogers, J., Fox, J. M. W., and Aitken, M. J.: 1979, ‘Magnetic Anisotropy in Ancient Pottery’,Nature 277, 644–646.
Shaw, J.: 1974, ‘A New Method of Determining the Magnitude of the Palaeomagnetic Field’,Geophys. J.R. Astron. Soc. 39, 133–141.
Shaw, J.: 1979, ‘Rapid Changes in the Magnitude of the Archaeomagnetic Field’,Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 58, 107–116.
Smith, P. J.: 1967, ‘On the Suitability of Igneous Rocks for Ancient Geomagnetic Field Intensity Determination’,Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2, 99–105.
Symons, D. T. A. and Schwartz, E. J.: 1970, Palaeointensity Study of Late Miocene Igneous Rocks from British Columbia’,Canada. Can. J. Earth Sci. 7, 196–181.
Tanguay, J. C.: 1975, ‘Intensity of the Geomagnetic Field from Recent Italian Lavas Using a New Palaeointensity Method’Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 27, 314–320.
Thellier, E. and Thellier, O.: 1959, ‘Sur l'intensité du champ magnetique terrestre dans le passé historique et geologique’,Ann Geophys. 15, 285–376.
Thomas, R. C.: 1981, ‘Archaeomagnetism of Greek Pottery and Cretan Kilns’. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Tucker, P.: 1980, ‘Stirred Remanent Magnetization: A Laboratory Analogue of Post-Deposital Realignment’.J. Geophys. 48, 153–157.
Van Zijl, J.S.V., Graham, K. W. T., and Hales, A. L.: 1962, ‘The Palaeomagnetism of the Stromberg Lavas of South Africa, Parts 1 and 2,Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 2, 83–39 and 169–182.
Walton, D.: 1977, ‘Archaeomagnetic Intensity Measurements Using aSQUID Magnetometer.Archaeometry 19, 192–200.
Wilson, R. L.: 1961, ‘Palaeomagnetism in Northern Ireland. Pt. 1-The Thermal Demagnetization of Natural Magnetic Moments in Rocks’,Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 5, 45–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, R. Review of archaeointensity methods. Geophysical Surveys 5, 381–393 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01453988
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01453988