Skip to main content
Log in

Scoring prevalence and severity in gonarthritis: the suitability of the Kellgren & Lawrence scale

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In clinical and epidemiological studies the Kellgren & Lawrence (K&L) scale was mainly used in the past to determine the radiological prevalence and severity of gonarthritis. The dependency of this scoring system on the presence of osteophytes has been criticised, and owing to its varying reliability, its appropriateness in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies is questioned. It was the purpose of this study to test whether the dependency of the K&L scale on the presence of osteophytes is reflected in a higher correlation of the overall score with a separate scoring of ‘osteophytes’ than with other radiological features. Furthermore we compared the inter- and intrarater reliability with the reliability of individual radiological features. Knee radiographs of 40 patients were graded according to the K&L scale and for the presence and severity of five separate radiological features of osteoarthritis. We found a moderate correlation of the K&L scale with the radiological features of ‘osteophytes’, ‘joint space narrowing’ and ‘flattening of condyles’. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of the K&L scale was higher than the reliability of the individual radiological features. The K&L scale seems not to be strongly dependent on the presence of osteophytes, i.e. there is not a higher correlation of the overall score with that feature than with other radiological features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper C, Cusnaghan J, Kirwan JR, Dieppe PA, Rogers J, McAlindon T, McCrae F. Radiographic assessment of the knee joint in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1992;51:80–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Atlas of standard radiographs: the Epidemiology of Chronic Rheumatism, vol. 2 Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kallman DA, Wigley FM, Scott WW, Hochberg MC, Tobin JD. New radiographic grading scales for osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum 1989;32:1584–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scott WW, Lethbridge-Cejku M, Reichle R, Wigley FM, Tobin JD, Hochberg MC. Reliability of grading scales for individual radiographic features of osteoarthritis of the knee. Invest Radiol 1993;28:497–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lane NE, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Hochberg MC. Reliability of new indices of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hand and hip and lumbar disc degeneration. J Rheumatol 1993;20:1911–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Symmons DPM, VanHemert AM, Vandenbroucke JP. A longitudinal study of back pain and radiological changes in the lumbar spine of middle age women. Ann Rheum Dis 1991;50:162–166.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lawrence JS. Rheumatism in populations. London: William Heinemann, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daniellson LG. Incidence and prognosis of coxarthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 1964;66:1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kjarskaard Anderson P, Christesen F, Schmidt SA. A new method of estimation of interobservers variation and its application to the radiologic assessment of osteoarthritis in hip joints. Stat Med 1988;7:639–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper C, Cook PL, Osmond C, Fisher L, Cawley MID. Osteoarthritis of the hip and osteoporosis of the proximal femur. Ann Rheum Dis 1991;50:540–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lienert GA. Testaufbau und Testanalyse. Weinheim: Beltz-Verlag, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wright JG, Feinstein AR. Improving the reliability of orthopaedic measurements. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74B:287–91.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jonasch E. Das Kniegelenk, Berlin: DeGruyter, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mohing W. Die Arthrosis deformans des Kniegelenkes. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sundaram NA, Hallett JP, Sullivan MF. Dome osteotomy of the tibia for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1986;68B:782–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Satku K, Kumar VP, Ngoi SS. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries. To counsel or to operate? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1986;68B:458–61.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kannus P, Järvinen M, Paakkala T. A radiological scoring scale for evaluation of post-traumatic osteoarthritis after knee ligament injuries. Int Orthop 1988;12:291–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Merchant TC, Dietz FR. Long-term follow-up after fractures of the tibial and fibular shafts. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1989;71A:599–606.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brandt KD, Fife RS, Braunstein EM, Katz B. Radiographic grading of the severity of knee osteoarthritis: relation of the Kellgren and Lawrence grade to a grade based on joint space narrowing and correlation with arthroscopic evidence of articular cartilage degeneration. Arthritis Rheum 1991;34:1381–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas RH, Resnick D, Alazraki NP, Daniel D, Greenfield R. Compartmental evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee. Radiology 1975;116:585–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Altman RD, Fries JF, Bloch DA, et al. Radiographic assessment of progression in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1987;30:1214–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Spector TD, Cooper C, Cushnaghan J, Hart DJ, Dieppe PA. A radiographic atlas of knee osteoarthritis. London: Springer, 1992:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spector TD, Dacre JE, Harris PA, Huskisson EC. Rdiological progression of osteoarthritis: an 11 year follow up study of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis 1992;51:1107–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Spector TD, Hart DJ, Bryne J, Harris PA, Dacre JE, Doyle DV. Definition of osteoarthritis of the knee for epidemiological studies. Ann Rheum Dis 1993;52:790–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott N. Rationale of the knee society clinical rating System. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Statistical Analysis System. SAS User's Guide. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan RF. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham osteoarthritis study. Arthritis Rheum 1987;30:914–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McAlindon TE, Snow S, Cooper C, Dieppe PA. Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis 1992;51:844–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bagge E, Bjelle A, Valkenburg HA, Svanborg A. Prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis intwo elderly european populations. Rheumatol Int 1992;12:33–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cerhan JR, Wallace RB, El-Khoury GY, Moore TE, Long CR. Decreased survival with increasing prevalence of full-body radiographically defined osteoarthritis in women. Am J Epidemiol 1995;141:225–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1986;29:1039–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kessler, S., Guenther, K.P. & Puhl, W. Scoring prevalence and severity in gonarthritis: the suitability of the Kellgren & Lawrence scale. Clin Rheumatol 17, 205–209 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01451048

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01451048

Keywords

Navigation