Skip to main content
Log in

Approximation of slow solutions to differential inclusions

  • Published:
Applied Mathematics and Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To approach a viable solution of a differential inclusion, i.e., staying at any time in a closed convexK, a sufficient condition is given implying the convergence of an approximation sequence defined from the Euler or Runge-Kutta methods applied to a selection process which corresponds to the slowsolution concept. WhenK is smooth, the convergence condition is satisfied. This proves that the method is implementable on a computer for solving, for instance, differentiable equations with a noncontinuous right-hand side. Since the usual best approximation operator is difficult to implement, we introduce a class of quasi-projectors much more suitable for computation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aubin, J. P. Slow and heavy trajectories of controlled problems. Smooth viability domains. In Multifunctions and Integrands (edited by G. Salinetti). Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1091. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aubin, J. P. Viability Theory (to appear).

  3. Aubin, J. P., and Cellina, A. Differential Inclusions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aubin, J. P., and Ekeland, I. Applied Nonlinear Analysis. Wiley, New York (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aubin, J. P., and Frankowska, H. Controllability of convex processes. SIAM J. Control Optim., 24 (1986), No. 6, 1192–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cornet, B., and Haddad, G. Viabilité pour les inclusions différentielles du 2d ordre. Israel J. Math., 57 (1987). MR 88d34015.

  7. Cterna and Karwat, Semi-continuity of multifunction connected with optimisation with respect to cones. J. Australian Math. Soc. Ser. A, 40 (1986), No. 2, 183–193. MR87d49029.

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Blasi, F. S., and Myjak, J. On the set of solutions of a differential inclusion. Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica, 14 (1986), No. 3, 271–275.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Doutchev, A. L., and Vel'ov, V. M. Singular perturbation in linear differential inclusion—critical case. Parametric Optim. and Approx. (Obervolfach, 1983), pp. 108–125. Internat. Schrift. Numer. Math., Vol. 72. Birkhauser, Basel (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Falcone, M., and Saint-Pierre, P. Slow and quasi-slow solutions of differential inclusions. NonLinear Anal. T.M.A., 11 (1987), No. 3, 367–377.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frankowska, H., Adjoint differential inclusion in necessary conditions for the minimal trajectories of differential inclusions. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 2 (1985), No. 2, 75–99.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haddad, G. Monotone viable trajectories for functional differential inclusions. J. Differential Equations, 42 (1981), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rubinov, A. M. The contingent derivative of a multivalued mapping and differentiability of the maximum under connected constraints. Sibirsk Mat. Zh, 26 (1985), No. 3, 147–155, 225. MR 87d49028.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Uryas'ev, S. P. The method of simple iterations for the solution of inclusion for multivalued mapping. Kibernetika (Kiev), IV (1985), No. 6, 115–116, 135. MR 87d90189.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saint-Pierre, P. Approximation of slow solutions to differential inclusions. Appl Math Optim 22, 311–330 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01447333

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01447333

Keywords

Navigation