Skip to main content
Log in

Linear programs with an additional reverse convex constraint

  • Published:
Applied Mathematics and Optimization Submit manuscript

Abstract

A constraintg(x)⩾0 is said to be a reverse convex constraint if the functiong is continuous and strictly quasi-convex. The feasible regions for linear programs with an additional reverse convex constraint are generally non-convex and disconnected. It is shown that the convex hull of the feasible region is a convex polytope and, as a result, there is an optimal solution on an edge of the polytope defined by only the linear constraints. The only possible edges which can contain such an optimal solution are characterized in relation to the best feasible vertex of the polytope defined by only the linear constraints. This characterization then provides a finite algorithm for finding a globally optimal solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Avriel and A. C. Williams, An extension of geometric programming with applications in engineering optimization,J. Eng. Math., 5, 187–194 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Balinski, An algorithm for finding all the vertices of convex polyhedral sets,J. SIAM., 9, 72–88 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. P. Bansal and S. E. Jacobsen, Characterization of local solutions for a class of nonconvex programs,J. Optimization Theory and Applications, 15, No. 5, May 1975.

  4. P. P. Bansal and S. E. Jacobsen, An algorithm for optimizing network flow capacity under economies-of-scale,J. Optimization Theory and Applications, 15, No. 5, May 1975.

  5. M. Carrillo,An Algorithm for Finding the Vertices of a Convex Polyhedron, University of Texas at Dallas, 1977.

  6. R. Carvajal-Moreno,Minimization of Concave Functions Subject to Linear Constraints, Operations Research Center Report ORC72-3, University of California, Berkeley, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. E. Dyer and L. G. Proll, An algorithm for determining all extreme points of a convex polytope,Mathematical programming, 12, 81–96 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. J. Hillestad, Optimization problems subject to a budget constraint with economies of scale,Operations Research, 23, No. 6, Nov.–Dec. 1975.

  9. R. J. Hillestad and S. E. Jacobsen, Reverse convex programming,Appl. Math. Optim. 6, 63–78 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Kararmadian, Duality in mathematical programming,J. Math. Analysis and Appl., 20, 344–358 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Meyer, The validity of a family of optimization methods,SIAM J. Control, 8, 41–54 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. B. Rosen, Iterative solution of nonlinear optimal control problems,SIAM J. Control, 4, 223–244 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Stoer, and C. Witzgall,Convexity and Optimization in Finite Dimensions, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Tuy, Concave programming under linear constraints,Soviet Mathematics, 5, 1437–1440, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  15. U. Ueing, A combinatorial method to compute a global solution of certain nonconvex optimization problems, inNumerical Methods for Nonlinear Optimization, F. A. Lootsma (ed.), Academic Press, 223–230 (1972).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. Stoer

Research supported by NSF Grant ENG76-12250 and ONR Contract N00014-78-C-0428.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hillestad, R.J., Jacobsen, S.E. Linear programs with an additional reverse convex constraint. Appl Math Optim 6, 257–269 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01442898

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01442898

Keywords

Navigation