Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis as developmental instability

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common spinal deformity affecting children, with a prevalence from mass screening programmes of 1–3%. Despite centuries of study, it remains a problem with no generally accepted theory of aetiology, and disagreement on its natural history and management. Because the deformity consists ultimately of gross left-right asymmetry, a study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that it might be a manifestation of developmental instability. Palmar dermatoglyphics in 112 normal subjects, 62 with non-scoliosis trunk asymmetry and 85 with defined adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were examined and both the absolute right-left difference and the ratio of this to the total were considered. There was increased fluctuating asymmetry of atd difference in those with any asymmetry, scoliotic or not, and increased directional asymmetry of ab and cd ridge counts only in those with pure scoliosis. This suggests that, at adolescence, developmental instability may result in a loss of symmetry in growth, and that in the presence of an increased developmental left-right gradient, this may be of sufficient severity to be classified as deformity and come to the attention of orthopaedic surgeons. This interpretation changes the focus of many previous observations on scoliosis and raises the prospect that developmental stability in humans has relevance to problems hitherto restricted to clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M.S. & J.D. Niswander, 1967. Developmental ‘noise’ and a congenital malformation. Genet. Res. Camb. 10: 313–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, P.D., J.D. Brody, D. Jaramillo, J.U. Akbar & J.B. Emans, 1993. Atypical idiopathic scoliosis: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 186: 247–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, H.L., S.P. Azen, E. Gerberg, R. Brooks & L. Chan, 1975. Scoliosis: a prospective epidemiological study. J. Bone & Joint Surg. 57A: 968–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell, W.P., 1988. The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin. Orth. 229: 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell, W.P., 1993. Outcome of spinal screening. Spine 18: 1572–1580.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burwell, R.G., P.H. Dangerfield & C.L. Vernon, 1977. Anthropometry and growth, pp. 123–164 in Scoliosis and Growth, edited by P. Zorab.

  • Burwell, R.G., S.S. Upadhyay, J.F. Patterson, et al., 1989. Femoral anteversion and the declive angle in 12–13 year old children referred by new screening criteria. A new theory of aetiology. J. Paediatric Orthopaedics 9: 349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, J.A., 1988. Current theories on the etiology of scoliosis. Clin. Orth. 229: 114–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, O.D. & G. Haynes, 1987. Prevalence rates for scoliosis in US adults: results from the first national health and nutrition examination survey. Int. J. Epidemiology 16: 537–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, J.R., 1948. Outline for the study of scoliosis. AAOS 7: 261–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S.D., A.E. Harding, S.W. Burke, T.S. Whitecloud, R.L. Barrack & T.M. Leinhardt, 1986. Upper extremity proprioception in idiopathic scoliosis. Clin. Orth. 213: 118–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coonrad, R.W., W.J. Richardson & W.J. Oakes, 1985. Left thoracic curves can be different. Orthop. Trans. 9: 126–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, H. & C. Midlo, 1961. Fingerprints, palms and soles. An introduction to dermatoglyphics. Dover Publishers Inc. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czeizel, A., A. Bellyei, O. Barta, T. Magda & L. Molnar, 1978. Genetics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Medical Genetics 14: 424–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, L.E., G.J. Bourke & J. McGilvray, 1991. Interpretation and uses of medical statistics. Blackwell Scientific Publications. 3rd edition.

  • DeGeorge, F.V. & R.L. Fisher, 1967. Idiopathic scoliosis: genetic and environmental aspects. Journal of Medical Genetics 4: 251–257.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duval-Beaupere, G., 1992. Rib hump and supine angle as prognostic factors for mild scoliosis. Spine 17: 103–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J.M., D.C. Freeman & J.H. Graham, 1993. Nonlinear growth dynamics and the origin of fluctuating asymmetry. Genetics 89: 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enneking, W.F. & P. Harrington, 1969. Pathological changes in scoliosis. J. Bone & Joint Surg. 51A: 165–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, A., 1941. Physiological scoliosis. J. Bone & Joint Surg. XXIII: 607–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, C., F. Thompson, F. Dowling, B.F. Regan & N.S. Blake, 1980. Pilot study for a screening programme in South Dublin. J. of the Irish Medical Assoc. 73: 265–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, C. & F.E. Dowling, 1990. Handedness and the convexity of scoliosis: a re-appraisal. Spine 15: 61–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, C. & F.E. Dowling, 1991. Idiopathic scoliosis and asymmetry of form and function. Spine 16: 84–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, C.J., F.E. Dowling & E.E. Fogarty, 1993a. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis — early menarche, normal growth. Spine 18: 529–535.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, C.J., F.E. Dowling & E.E. Fogarty, 1993b. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is rising growth rate the triggering factor in progression? Eur. Spine J. 2: 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, C.J., F.E. Dowling, E.E. Fogarty & D.P. Moore, 1994. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and developmental theory: a new look at an old subject. British Scoliosis Society. Bristol, UK. 24–25 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, C.J., F.E. Dowling & E.E. Fogarty, 1994. Left thoracic scoliosis—why so different? Spine 19: 1385–1389.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, C.J., F.E. Dowling, E.E. Fogarty & D.P. Moore. School scoliosis screening and the US preventive Services Task Force. An examination of long-term results. Spine, in press.

  • Graham, J.H., D.C. Freeman & J.M. Emlen, 1993. Antisymmetry, directional asymmetry and dynamic morphogenesis. Genetica 89: 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, M.H., M.A. Rieger, F. Miller & A. Kaelin, 1990. Influence of parental age on degree of curvature in idiopathic scoliosis. J. Bone & Joint Surg. 72A: 910–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoey, H.M.C.V., J.M. Tanner & L.A. Cox, 1987. Clinical growth standards for Irish children. Acta Paed. Scand. Supp. 338.

  • James, J.I.P., 1954. Idiopathic scoliosis: the prognosis, diagnosis and operative indications related to curve patterns and the age of onset. J. Bone & Joint Surg. 36B: 36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantz, R.L. & H. Brehme, 1993. Directional and fluctuating asymmetry in the palmar interdigital ridge-counts. Anthropologischer Anzeiger 51: 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langenskiold, A., & J.-E. Michelsson, 1961. Experimental progressive scoliosis in the rabbit. J. Bone & Joint Surg. 43B: 116–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J. & R.A. Dickson, 1986. The experimental basis of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin. Orthop. 210: 9–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewonowski, K., J.D. King & M.D. Nelson, 1992. Routine use of magnetic resonance imaging in idiopathic scoliosis patients less than eleven years of age. Spine 17 (6S): 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loesch, D.Z. & M. LaFranchi, 1990. Relationships of epidermal ridge patterns with body measurements and their possible evolutionary significance. Am. J. of Phys. Anthrop. 82: 183–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonstein, J.E. & J.M. Carlson, 1984. The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J. Bone & Joint Surg. 66-A(7): 1061–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonstein, J.E., 1988. Why school screening for scoliosis should be continued. Spine 13: 1198–1199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T.A., 1992. Human handedness and the concept of developmental stability. Genetica 87: 87–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, M.H. 1981. Moire topography and associated asymmetries in scoliosis, pp. 186–189 in Moire Topography and Spinal Deformities, edited by N.S. Moreland, M.H. Pope & G.W.D. Armstrong. Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., 1944. Lateral vertebral dimensions and lateral spinal curvature. Human Biology 16: 153–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normelli, H., J.A. Sevastik, G. Ljung & A.-M. Jonsson-Soderstrom, 1986. The symmetry of the breasts in normal and scoliotic girls. Spine 99: 749–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otremski, I., M. Katz, G. Livshits & Z. Cohen, 1993. Biology of aging in an Israeli Population. Anthropologischer Anzeiger 51: 233–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, A.R. & C. Strobeck, 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry. Measurement, analysis, patterns. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 391–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P., 1973. Maternal age and dermatoglyphic asymmetry in man. Hum. Hered. 23: 226–229.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pecina, M., O. Lulic-Ducik & A. Pecina-Hrncevic, 1991. Hereditary orthodontic anomalies and idiopathic scoliosis. Int. Orth. 15: 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltier, L.F., 1985. Nicolas Andry. The designer of orthopedic iconography. Clin. Orthop. 200: 54–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, E.W., 1952. Rotational lordosis: the development of the single curve. J. Bone & Joint Surg. 34-B(3): 421–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terver, S., R. Kleinman & E.E. Bleck, 1980. Growth landmarks and the evolution of scoliosis: a review of pertinent studies and their usefulness. Dev. Med. & Child Neurol. 22: 675–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D.W., 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge University Press. 2nd Edition 1942; abridged edition by J.T. Bonner, 1961.

  • Van Valen, L., 1962. A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution XVI: 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J., 1988. The Classic: Concerning the interrelationship between form and function of the individual parts of the organism (1900). Clin. Orthop. 228: 2–11. (Trans. M. Scheck).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, C.M. & A. Gianas, 1976. Congenital cleft lip and fluctuating dermatoglyphic asymmetry. American Journal of Human Genetics 28: 400–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, C.M. & A. Gianas, 1977. A study of fluctuating dermatoglyphic asymmetry in the sibs and parents of cleft lip propositi. Am. J. of Hum. Genetics 28: 503–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Davies, R., 1968. Familial (idiopathic) scoliosis. A family survey. J. Bone & Joint Surg. 50-B: 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakharov, V.M., 1992. Population phenogenetics: Analysis of developmental stability in natural populations. Acta Zool. Fennica 19: 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Children's Research Centre, Our Lady's Hospital for Sick Children, Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland

    Caroline J. Goldberg

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, Our Lady's Hospital for Sick Children, Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland

    Frank E. Dowling, Esmond E. Fogarty & David P. Moore

Authors
  1. Caroline J. Goldberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frank E. Dowling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Esmond E. Fogarty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David P. Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldberg, C.J., Dowling, F.E., Fogarty, E.E. et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis as developmental instability. Genetica 96, 247–255 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01439579

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01439579

Key words

Search

Navigation