Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosome alterations in tissue culture cells ofAllium fistulosum

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heterochromatin behaviour and structural alterations in chromosomes of cells derived from callus culture ofAllium fistulosum have been studied.

The diploid chromosome complement ofAllium fistulosum consists of 16 chromosomes with significant amount of heterochromatin mainly of telomeric nature. In eight collections of callus cells analysed, a high rate of numerical and structural chromosome abnormalities was observed. After 12 months in culture about 20% of metaphase chromosomes possessed distinct signs of mutational events.

C-banded preparations revealed that many structural alterations involved regions of heterochromatin. Interchromosomal connections and chromatid fusions occurred at telomeric heterochromatin segments. Also formation of the end-to-end associations and polycentric chromosomes often took place without visible loss of telomeric heterochromatin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badr, A. & T.T. Elkington, 1977. Variation of Giemsa C-band and fluorochrome banded karyotypes, and relationships inAllium subgen.Molium. Pl. Syst. Evol. 128: 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, E.H., 1990. Telomeres and their synthesis. Science 249: 489–490.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, E.H., 1991. Structure and function of telomeres. Nature 350: 569–572.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiskesjö, G., 1975. Chromosomal relationships between three species ofAllium as revealed by C-banding. Hereditas 81: 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geber, G. & D. Schweizer, 1988. Cytochemical heterochromatin differentiation inSinapsis alba (Cruciferae) using a simple air drying technique for producing chromosome spreads. Pl. Syst. Evol. 158: 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, D. & S. Stack, 1976. Homologous and non-homologous chromosome associations by interchromosomal chromatin connectives inOrnithogalum virens. Chromosoma 57: 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, J.P., A.J. Łukaszewski & M.D. Bennett, 1983. Somatic deletion and redistribution of telomeric heterochromatin in the genusSecale andTriticale. Chromosoma 88: 293–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, C.B., A.B. Futcher & C.W. Greider, 1990. Telomeres shorten during ageing of human fibroblasts. Nature 345: 458–460.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist, G. & M. Dancis, 1980. A general model of karyotype evolution. Genetica 52/53: 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachimiak, A., L. Przywara, T. Ilnicki & A. Kowalska, 1993. Megachromosomes in tissue culture ofAllium. Genetica 90: 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.S., R.L. Phillips, H.W. Rines, 1987a. Meiotic behaviour in progeny of tissue culture regenerated oat plants (Avena sativa L.) carrying near-telocentric chromosomes. Genome 29: 431–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.S., R.L. Phillips & H.W. Rines, 1987b. Possible role of heterochromatin in chromosome breakage induced by the tissue culture in oats (Avena sativa L.). Genome 29: 439–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapitan, N.L.V., R.G. Sears & B.S. Gill, 1984. Translocations and other karyotypic structural changes in wheat x rye hybrids regenerated from tissue culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 68: 547–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. & R.L. Phillips, 1988. The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 39: 413–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima-de-Faria, A., 1969. DNA replication and gene amplification in heterochromatin. In: Handbook of molecular cytology, A. Lima-de-Faria ed. North Holland Publishers Co., Amsterdam and London. pp. 277–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G.E., 1977. The nature of centromeric dots inNigella chromosomes. Chromosoma 62: 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, J.E. & J.R. Ellison, 1975. The organization of interphase chromatin inDrosophilidae. The self adhesion of chromatin containing the same DNA sequence. Chromosoma 52: 37–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B., 1978. Mechanisms that rapidly reorganize the genome. Stadler Genet. Symp. 10: 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B., 1941. The stability of broken ends of chromosomes inZea mays. Genetics 26: 234–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, T.J., R.L. Phillips & H.W. Rines, 1982. Cytogenetic analysis of plants regenerated from oat (Avena sativa) tissue cultures; high frequency of partial chromosome loss. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 24: 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T. & Skoog, F., 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Pl. 15, 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, M.M. & E. Dempsey, 1972. On the mechanism of chromatin loss induced by the B chromosome of maize. Genetics 71: 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacristan, M.D., 1971. Karyotypic changes in callus cultures from haploid and diploid plants ofCrepis capillaris (L.) Wallr. Chromosoma 33: 273–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzacher, T., P. Ambros & D. Schweizer, 1980. Application of Giemsa banding to orchid karyotype analysis. Pl. Syst. Evol. 134: 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelly, D.M., D.W. Altman, R.J. Kohel, T.S. Rangan & E. Commiskey, 1989. Cytogenetic abnormalities of cotton somaclones from callus cultures. Genome 32: 762–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vig, B.K. & B.T. Richards, 1992. Formation of primary constriction and heterochromatin in mouse does not require minor satellite DNA. Exp. Cell Res. 201: 292–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joachimiak, A., Ilnicki, T., Kowalska, A. et al. Chromosome alterations in tissue culture cells ofAllium fistulosum . Genetica 96, 191–198 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01439572

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01439572

Key words

Navigation