Abstract
Arguments are presented for the reconsideration of models which guide planning behavior and structure planning organizations. Hierarchical organizations are contrasted with reticular organizations and the latter are presented as necessary for effective citizen participation. Legitimacy is presented as a fundamental basis of justifying planning action and historical shifts in forms of legitimacy are noted. Participation, as a form of legitimacy, and several aspects of participatory planning are discussed in terms of recent systems thinking. It is argued that participatory planning increases the effectiveness and adaptivity of the planning process and contributes adaptivity and stability to the societal system. Further, it is argued that citizen participation is an essential element in making the planning process a learning system. This leads to a strengthening of the definition and role of communities in the urban system, and to an unexpected requirement of planners who would adopt a participatory planning process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Environment and Urban Systems,Metropolitan Transportation Planning Seminars, December 1971.
Smith, Richard Warren, “Transportation and Urban Form,” M. Arch. Thesis, M.I.T., 1966.
Mesarovic, M. D.,The Control Of Multivariable Systems, 1960, p. 14.
Vickers, Geoffrey,Freedom In A Rocking Boat, 1970, p. 99.
Schutzenberger, M. P., “A Tentative Classification of Goal Seeking Behaviors,” in F. E. Emery, ed.,Systems Thinking, 1969, p. 211.
Bower, Joseph H., “Descriptive Decision Theory From The Administrative Viewpoint,” in R. A. Bauer and K. J. Gergen, eds.The Study of Policy Formation, p. 107.
Davidoff, Paul, “Advocacy And Pluralism In Planning,”AIP Journal (Nov. 1965), pp. 331–337; Vickers,op. cit., p. 99.
Rein, Martin, “Social Planning: The Search For Legitimacy,”AIP Journal (July 1969), p. 237.
Dunn, Edgar S., Jr.,Economic And Social Development, 1971, p. 92; Werner, Heinz, “The Concept Of Development From A Comparative And Organismic Point Of View,” in D. B. Harris, ed.,The Concept Of Development, 1957, p. 125.
Mannheim, Karl,Man And Society In An Age Of Reconstruction, 1940, p. 373.
Rein,op. cit., p. 240.
Rein,op. cit., p. 243.
Forrester, J. W., “Counterintuitive Behavior Of Social Systems,”Technology Review, (Jan. 1971), p. 53.
Dunn,op. cit., p. 93.
Mannheim,op. cit., p. 46.
Emery, F. E. and Trist, E. L., “The Causal Texture Of Organizational Environments,” in F. E. Emery, ed.,Systems Thinking, 1969, p. 249.
Dunn,op. cit., p. 240.
Holland, John H., “Concerning Efficient Adaptive Systems,” in Yovits, Jacobi and Goldstein, eds.,Self Organizing Systems, 1962, p. 220.
Buckley, Walter,Sociology And Modern Systems Theory, 1967, p. 206–207.
Buckley,op. cit., p. 51.
Mesarovic, M. D., D. Macko and Y. Takahara,Theory Of Hierarchical, Multilevel Systems, 1970, p. 34.
Mesarovicet al., ibid., p. 33.
Etzioni, Amitai,The Active Society, 1968, p. 45.
Dunn,op. cit., p. 226.
Ibid., p. 194.
Likert, Rensis,The Human Organization: Its Management And Practice, 1967, pp. 156–158.
Dunn,op. cit., p. 201.
Mesarovicet al., op. cit., p. 50.
Dunn,op. cit., p. 227.
Ibid., pp. 192–3.
Ibid., p. 231.
Mesarovicet al., op. cit., p. 23; Dunn,op. cit., p. 203.
Seeman, Melvin, J. M. Bishop and J. E. Grigsby,Community And Control In A Metropolitan Setting, UCLA, 1970.
Erikson, E. H.,Identity And The Life Cycle, 1959, pp. 110–114.
Rein,op. cit., p. 241.
Arnstein, Sherry, “A Ladder Of Citizen Participation,”AIP Journal (July 1969), p. 221.
White, R. W.,Ego And Reality In Psychoanalytic Theory, 1963, pp. 138, 186.
Ibid., p. 188.
Argyris, Chris,Understanding Organizational Behavior, 1960, pp. 8–9.
Trist, Eric, “A Socio-Technical Critique Of Scientific Management,” a paper presented to the Conference on the Impact of Science and Technology, Edinburgh, 1970, p. 13.
Ibid., pp. 14–15.
McWhinney, W. H.,Not Industrial Democracy But A Reticular Society, UCLA, 1971, p. 9.
Trist,op. cit., pp. 10–13.
Yovits, Marshall C., G. Jacobi and G. Goldstein,Self Organizing Systems, 1962, p. ix.
Mesarovic, M. D., “On Self-Organizing Systems,” in Yovitset al., eds.,Self Organizing Systems, 1962, p. 9.
Mesarovic, 1960, p. 7.
Mesarovic, 1962, p. 12.
Mesarovicet al., 1970, p. 65.
Ibid., p. 41.
Other references of general USE
Alexander, Christopher (1966). “The City Is Not A Tree,”Design (January).
Altschuler, Alan (1965).The City Planning Process. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bertalauffy, L. von (1968).General Systems Theory. New York: Braziller.
Bolan, Richard S. (1969). “Community Decision Behavior: The Culture of Planning,”AIP Journal (September), pp. 301–310. Washington D.C.: American Institute of Planners.
Davidoff, Paul and Linda and Gold, N. N. (1970). “Suburban Action: Advocate Planning for an Open Society,”AIP Journal (January), pp. 12–21.
Davidoff, Paul and Reiner, T. (1962). “A Choice Theory of Planning,”AIP Journal (May), pp. 103–115. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Planners.
Dewey, John (1934).A Common Faith. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dewey, John (1943). “Development of American Pragmatism”, in D. D. Runes, eds.,Twentieth Century Philosophy. New York: Philosophical Society.
Dyckman, John W. (1969). “The Practical Uses of Planning Theory,”AIP Journal, (September), pp. 298–300.
Emery, F. E. (1969).Systems Thinking. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Emery, F. E. (1969). “The Historical Validity of the Industrial Democracy Project,” mimeo, April.
Garvey, James E. (1963).Self-Organizing Systems, Washington.
Henderson, Hazel (1971). “The Computer in Social Planning,”The Master in Business Administration, (December), p. 14.
Hughes, James and Mann, L. (1969). “Systems and Planning Theory,”AIP Journal, (September), pp. 330–333.
Keyes, Langley C., Jr. and Teitcher, E. (1970). “Limitations of Advocacy Planning: A View from the Establishment,”AIP Journal, (July), pp. 225–226.
Lindblom, Charles (1965).The Intelligence of Democracy. New York: The Free Press.
Marcuse, H. (1964).One Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.
McWhinney, W. H. (1971).Phenomenarchy: A Suggestion for Social Redesign. Graduate School of Management, UCLA (June).
McWhinney, W. H. (1968). “Organizational Form, Decision Modalities and the Environment,”Human Relations, pp. 269–281.
Meier, Richard L. (1962).A Communications Theory of Urban Growth, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Merton, Robert K. (1968).Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
Mesarovic, M. D. (1968).Systems Theory and Biology. New York: Springer.
Peattie, Lisa R. (1970). “Drama and Advocacy Planning,”AIP Journal (November), pp. 409–410.
Wiebenson, John (1969). “Planning and Using Resurrection City,”AIP Journal (November), pp. 405–411.
Wiener, Norbert (1961).Cybernetics: Or, Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, R.W. A theoretical basis for participatory planning. Policy Sci 4, 275–295 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435125
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435125