Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of the interaction potential on simulated sputtering and reflection data

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters

Abstract

The TRIM.SP program which is based on the binary collision approximation was changed to handle not only repulsive interaction potentials, but also potentials with an attractive part. Sputtering yields, average depth and reflection coefficients calculated with four different potentials are compared. Three purely repulsive potentials (Molière, Kr-C and ZBL) are used and an ab initio pair potential, which is especially calculated for silicon bombardment by silicon. The general trends in the calculated results are similar for all potentials applied, but differences between the repulsive potentials and the ab initio potential occur for the reflection coefficients and the sputtering yield at large angles of incidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stillinger, F.H., Weber, T.A.: Phys. Rev. B31, 5262 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tersoff, J.: Phys. Rev. B37, 6991;38, 9902 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harrison, D.E. Jr.: CRC critical reviews in solid state and material sciences, vol. 14, Suppl. 1. Boca Raton: CRC-Press 1988

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eckstein, W.: Computer simulation of ion-solid interactions, Springer Series in Materials Science 10. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1991

    Google Scholar 

  5. Molière, G.: Z. Naturforsch. A2, 133 (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson, W.D., Haggmark, L.G., Biersack, J.P.: Phys. Rev. B15, 2458 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ziegler, J.F., Biersack, J.P., Littmark, U.: The stopping and range of ions in solids, vol. 1. New York: Pergamon Press 1985

    Google Scholar 

  8. O'Connor, D.J., Biersack, J.P.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods B15, 14 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heinemann, D., Rosén, A., Fricke, B.: Phys. Scr.41, 692 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hackel, S., Fricke, B., Heinemann, D., Kolb, D., Yang, L.: GSI-90-1, p. 165 (1990)

  11. Biersack, J.P., Eckstein, W.: Appl. Phys. A34, 73 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oen, O.S., Robinson, M.T.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods132, 647 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lindhard, J., Scharff, M.: Phys. Rev.124, 128 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Biersack, J.P., Haggmark, L.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods174, 257 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davis, P.J., Polansky, I.: In: Handbook of mathematical functions, chap. 25, p. 889. Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A. (eds.). New York: Dover 1965

    Google Scholar 

  16. Robinson, M.T., Torrens, I.M.: Phys. Rev.B9, 5008 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson, M.T.: Tables of Classical Scattering Integrals, U.S. Atomic Energy Emission, Report ORNL-4556, 1970

  18. Schlager, H.G., Eckstein, W.: IPP-Report 9/69, Garching, 1991

  19. Eckstein, W., Bohdansky, J., Roth, J.: Nuclear fusion supplement, vol. 1, IAEA, Vienna, 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eckstein, W., Hackel, S., Heinemann, D. et al. Influence of the interaction potential on simulated sputtering and reflection data. Z Phys D - Atoms, Molecules and Clusters 24, 171–176 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01426703

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01426703

PACS

Navigation