Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Subective poverty line definitions

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In this paper we will deal with definitions ofsubjective poverty lines. To measure a poverty threshold value in terms of household income, which separates the poor from the non-poor, we take into account the opinions of all people in society. Three subjective methods will be discussed and compared,viz., the Leyden Poverty Line (LPL), the Subjective Poverty Line (SPL) and the Centre for Social Policy Poverty Line (CSP). In the empirical part of the paper we compute the average poverty line and a few corresponding characteristics for each definition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitchison, J. and J.A.C. Brown (1957),The Lognormal Distribution, Cambridge.

  • Colasanto, D., A. Kapteyn and J. van der Gaag (1984), ‘Two Subjective Definitions of Poverty: Results from the Wisconsin Basic Needs Study,’Journal of Human Resources, 19, pp. 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, S., J. van der Gaag, M.K. Taussig and E. Smolensky (1984), ‘The Direct Measurement of Welfare Levels; How Much Does it Cost to Make Ends Meet?,’Review of Economics and Statistics, 66, pp. 500–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleeck, H. (1977), ‘Bestaanszekerheid en het Sociale Zekerheidsstelsel in Belgie-1974,’Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Sociale Zekerheid, 19, pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleeck, H., J. Berghman and P. Janssens (1984), ‘Sociale Zekerheid: Inkomensverdeling en Doelmatigheid Anno 1982,’De Gids Op Maatschappelijk Gebied, 75, pp. 595–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleeck, H. and K. Van den Bosch (1989), ‘The Measurement of Poverty in a Comparative Context: Empirical Evidence and Methodological Evaluation of Four Poverty Lines in Seven EC-countries,’ Report presented at Noordwijk, SeminarPoverty Statistics in The European Community.

  • Efron, B. (1982),The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, E., (1883), ‘Der Werth des Menschen. 1. Teil: Der Kostenwerth des Menschen,’Volkswirtschaftliche Zeitfragen, 37–38, pp. 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, V. (1967), ‘Redefining Poverty and Redistributing Income,’Public Interest, Summer, pp. 88–95.

  • Ghiatis, A. (1989), ‘Low Income Groups Obtained by Enhanced Processing of the Household Budget Surveys in the EC - Summary Figures for Italy and The Netherlands,' Report presented at Noordwijk, SeminarPoverty Statistics in the European Community.

  • Goedhart, Th., V. Halberstadt, A. Kapteyn and B.M.S. van Praag (1977), ‘The Poverty Line: Concept and Measurement,’The Journal of Human Resources,12, pp. 503–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, A.J.M. and B.M.S. van Praag (1985), ‘A Synthesis of Poverty Line Definitions,’Review of Income and Wealth,31, pp. 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, A.J.M. (1986),The Perception of Poverty, Amsterdam.

  • Helson, H. (1964),Adaptation-Level Theory; An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behaviour, New York.

  • Johnson, N.L. and S. Kotz (1971),Distributions in Statistics, Continuous Univariate Distributions-1, New York.

  • Kapteyn, A., T.J. Wansbeek and J. Buyze (1980), ‘The Dynamics of Preference Formation,’Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 1, pp. 123–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapteyn, A., S. van de Geer and H. van de Stadt (1985), ‘The Impact of Changes in Income and Family Composition on Subjective Measures of Well-Being,’ in: M. David and T. Smeeding (eds.),Horizontal Equity, Uncertainty and Economic Well-Being, Chicago.

  • Moriani, C. (1989), ‘The Italian Experience on Poverty Harmonized Measures,' Report presented at Noordwijk, SeminarPoverty Statistics in the European Community.

  • Orshansky, M. (1965), ‘Counting the Poor: Another Look at the Poverty Profile,’Social Security Bulletin,28, pp. 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1909), Manuel d'économie politique, Paris.

  • Praag, B.M.S. van (1968),Individual Welfare Functions and Consumer Behavior, Amsterdam.

  • Praag, B.M.S. van (1971), ‘The Welfare Function of Income in Belgium: An Empirical Investigation,’European Economic Review, 2, pp. 337–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praag, B.M.S. van and A. Kapteyn (1973), ‘Further Evidence on the Individual Welfare Function of Income: An Empirical Investigation in The Netherlands,’European Economic Review, 4, pp. 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praag, B.M.S. van, Th. Goedhart and A. Kapteyn (1980), ‘The Poverty Line. A Pilot Survey in Europe,’Review of Economics and Statistics, 62, pp. 461–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praag, B.M.S. van (1982), ‘A Comparison of Objective and Subjective Measures of Poverty,’ in: G. Sarpellon (ed.), Understanding Poverty, Istituto Internazionale ‘Jacques Maritain,’ Roma, Italy and Franco Angeli Libri s.r.l. Milano, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praag, B.M.S. van, A.J.M. Hagenaars and J. van Weeren (1982), ‘Poverty in Europe,’Review of Income and Wealth, 28, pp. 345–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praag, B.M.S. van (1988), ‘The Relativity of the Welfare Concept,' Report WP 69, World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United Nations University, Helsinki, forthcoming in: M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds.), The Quality of Life, Oxford.

  • Praag, B.M.S. van and N.L. van der Sar (1988), ‘Household Cost Functions and Equivalence Scales,’Journal of Human Resources,23, pp. 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praag, B.M.S. van (1989), ‘Ordinal and Cardinal Utility: An Integration of the Two Dimensions of the Welfare Concept,’ forthcoming inThe Journal of Econometrics.

  • Rao, C.R. (1973),Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications, New York.

  • Robbins, L. (1932),An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 1st. ed., London.

  • Rowntree, B.S. (1901),Poverty: A Study of Town Life, London.

  • Sen, A. (1986),Economics and Ethics, London.

  • Teekens, R. and M.A. Zaidi (1989), ‘Relative and Absolute Poverty in The European Community; Results from Family Budget Surveys,' Report presented at Noordwijk, SeminarPoverty Statistics in the European Community.

  • Townsend, P. (1974), ‘Poverty as Relative Deprivation: Resources and Style of Living,' in: D. Wedderburn (ed.),Poverty, Inequality and Class Structure, London.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Econometric Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam

    Bernard M. S. van Praag (Research Assistant, Professor of Economics and member)

  2. Econometric Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam

    Bernard M. S. van Praag (Research Assistant, Professor of Economics and member)

  3. Scientific Council for Government Policy (W.R.R.), The Hague

    Bernard M. S. van Praag (Research Assistant, Professor of Economics and member)

Authors
  1. Robert J. Flik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernard M. S. van Praag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flik, R.J., van Praag, B.M.S. Subective poverty line definitions. De Economist 139, 311–330 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01423569

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01423569

Keywords

Search

Navigation