Abstract
This paper considers the nature of medical work and how new telemedicine technologies can be developed to support that work. Telemedicine developers attempt to increase communication and collaboration between medical practitioners and between patients and medics, with the goal being to make medical care and information more easily accessible. However, the focus of telemedicine systems appears to have so far been technology centred, and the work they are trying to support is often ignored. We argue that to develop appropriate telemedicine technologies, it is important to understand the nature of medical work, and to examine the manner in which medical practiceactually occurs. Only then will we be in a position to design appropriate telemedicine technologies to support these activities. Unless designers have an insight into the work itself, new technologies will continue to fail to support what telemedicine effectively aims to promote — collaboration and access to distributed knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Craig J. Introduction. In: Introduction to telemedicine. Wooten R, Craig J. eds. London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited, 1999; 3–15
Watts LA, Monk AF. Telemedicine: what happens in remote consultation. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1999; 15: 220–235
Young HL. Tele-education. In: Introduction to telemedicine. Wooten R, Craig J. eds. London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited, 1999; 65–75
Riva G. Virtual reality applications in neuroscience. Unpublished paper
Grimson WEL, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA, Black PM. Image guided surgery. Scientific American 1999; 280: 54–61
ROBODOC web site, last viewed on 27 August 1999. Available online at http://www.robodoc.com
Cicourel AV. The integration of distributed knowledge in collaborative medical diagnosis. In: Intellectual teamwork — social and technological foundations of co-operative work. Galegher J, Kraut RE, Egido C. eds. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990; 221–242
Strauss AL, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Wiener C. Social organisation of medical work. Transaction Publishers, 1985
Berg M, Bowker G. The multiple bodies of the medical record. The Sociological Quarterly 1997; 38: 513–537
Symon G, Long K, Ellis J. The co-ordination of work activities: co-operation and conflict in a hospital context. Computer Supported Co-operative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 1996; 5: 1–31
Strauss A. Work and the division of labour. The Sociological Quarterly 1985; 26:1–19
Hajdukiewicz JR, Doyle DJ, Milgram P, Vicente KJ, Burns CM. A work domain analysis of patient monitoring in the operating room. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, 1998; 1038–1042
Karinch M. Telemedicine, what the future holds when you're ill. New Horizon Press, 1994
Robinson M. Keyracks and computers-an introduction to common artefacts in computer supported co-operative work (CSCW). WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 1993; 35: 157–166
Walsh JP, Ungson GR. Organisational memory. Academy of Management Review 1991; 16: 57–91
Kyng M. Designing for co-operation: co-operating in design. Communications of the ACM 1991; 34: 65–73
Bannon LJ. The context of CSCW. In: Report of COST14 “CoTech” Working Group 4. Schmidt K. ed. 1993; 9–36
UK National Database of Telemedicine, last viewed on 27 August 1999. Maintained by the University of Portsmouth. Available online at http://www.dis.prot.ac.uk/ndtm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rajani, R., Perry, M. The reality of medical work: The case for a new perspective on telemedicine. Virtual Reality 4, 243–249 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01421807
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01421807