Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Program evaluation in the public interest: A new research methodology

  • Articles
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For every social welfare or social control service program there are several parties, each with different interests: patients, clients, staff, management, and sponsors. Evaluation of such a program in the public interest must take the interests of each of these parties into account. To do so requires an untraditional methodology, that of a second-person, or communal, science, which is not above the conflict of parties and their interests in specifying the variables, staffing the research, balancing considerations of intrusion against those of bias, considering the action implications of the data, sequentially staging the research, or even publishing findings. This all makes evaluation in the public interest a highly political process often unlikely to be logically decisive about intervariable relationships, to yield generalizable results, or even to be completed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C.Intervention theory and method. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boruch, R.P. Measurements in experiments. In H.W. Riecken, & R.F. Boruch (Eds.),Social experimentation, 1974.

  • Carn, G.C., & Hollister, R.G. The methodology of evaluating social action programs. In P.H. Rossi, & W. Williams (Eds.),Evaluating social programs. New York: Seminar Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, M.S. Construct validity for the evaluation of therapy outcomes,Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1969,74, 524–530.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, M.S. Experimental control as a sampling problem in counseling and therapy research.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1972,19, 340–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M., & Levi, M. Community organization as a political resource. In H. Hahn (Ed.),People and politics in urban society. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, P., & Rein, M.Dilemmas of social reform. New York: Atherton, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E.J., Campbell, D.T., Schwartz, R.P., & Sechrest, L.Unobtrusive measures. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, D.J., & Beightler, C.S.Foundations of optimization. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Medical School, USA

    Merton S. Krause Ph.D. (Professor of Psychology)

  2. Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, USA

    Kenneth I. Howard Ph.D. (Professor)

Authors
  1. Merton S. Krause Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenneth I. Howard Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Both are Senior Research Associates of the Illinois Department of Mental Health, Institute for Juvenile Research, 1140 South Paulina, Chicago, Illinois, 60612, where they do their evaluation research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krause, M.S., Howard, K.I. Program evaluation in the public interest: A new research methodology. Community Ment Health J 12, 291–300 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419757

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419757

Keywords

Search

Navigation